Law Commons^™

Sacred Disputes? On The Ministerial Exception And The Constitution, Mark Strasser

Mark Strasser

Federal courts have long been hearing church disputes, for example, concerning conflicting claims regarding the rightful possession and use of church property. However, there is no clear understanding concerning the contours of the constitutional limitations on the courts when one of the parties in interest is a religious organization. The conflicting jurisprudence may be clarified in the 2011-2012 term when the Court hears and decides Hosanna–Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church and School v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, although there is reason to be pessimistic that this will happen. This article lays out the relevant jurisprudence as presented by the United States …

Gray Matters: Autism, Impairment, And The End Of Binaries, Kevin M. Barry

Kevin M Barry

First diagnosed by psychiatrist Leo Kanner in 1943, Autism has exploded into the public consciousness in recent years. From science to science fiction, academia to popular culture, Autism has captured the world’s attention and imagination. Autism has also ignited a fierce debate among stakeholders who seek to define its essence. Many parents of Autistic children regard Autism as a scourge and press for a cure. The Neurodiversity Movement, comprised mostly of Autistic adults, regards Autism as a different way of being worthy of respect and even celebration. The Autism war is well underway and, given Autism’s swelling ranks and proposed …

Suicide Killing Of Human Life As Human Right - The Continuing Devolution Of Assisted Suicide Law In The United Kingdom, William Wagner

William Wagner

SUICIDE KILLING OF HUMAN LIFE AS A HUMAN RIGHT

The Continuing Devolution of Assisted Suicide Law

in the United Kingdom

PROF. WILLIAM WAGNER, PROF. JOHN KANE, AND STEPHEN P. KALLMAN

ABSTRACT

Since the beginning of time, divine, natural, and positive law traditions of the United Kingdom reflected an inviolable standard that people should not assist in the killing of human life. This article reviews and analyzes the ancient inviolable benchmark, explaining why the common and statutory law of Britain historically reflected its moral reference point to prohibit assisted suicide. We then proceed to analyze a contemporary jurisprudential shift in Britain’s …

“Bull” Coming From The States: Why The U.S. Supreme Court Should Use Williams V. Illinois To Close One Of Bullcoming’S Confrontation Clause Loopholes, Tara Klimek Price

Tara Price

Imagine that you are selected as a juror in a trial where the defendant is accused of driving while under the influence of alcohol. You listen to the police officer who testifies that he observed the defendant and believed him to be intoxicated. You hear about how after obtaining a warrant, the officer took the defendant to the emergency room for a blood-alcohol test. The police officer finishes his testimony, and the next witness will testify about the results of the defendant’s blood-alcohol test.

But before the witness can testify, defense counsel objects. Apparently, this is not the laboratory analyst …

Religious Freedom In Private Lawsuits: Untangling When Rfra Applies To Suits Involving Only Private Parties, Sara Lunsford Kohen

Sara Kohen

Religious Freedom in Private Lawsuits: Untangling When RFRA Applies to Suits Involving Only Private Parties, for publication discusses when courts should apply the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (“RFRA”) in cases in which the federal government is not a party. Congress passed RFRA in reaction to the Supreme Court’s decision in Employment Division v. Smith. The Court held in Smith that the Constitution does not require religious exemptions from neutral, generally applicable laws—those that do not target religion and cover non-religious conduct to the same extent as religious conduct. By contrast, RFRA allows a federal law to substantially burden a religious …

Social Capital Benefits Of Peer Mentoring Relationships In Law School, Meera E. Deo, Kimberly A. Griffin

Meera E Deo

Scholars have addressed the rigors of law school and suggest mentorship may help students better navigate their educational environments. However, literature largely addresses the role of faculty mentors, less often considering peer mentors in the law school context. This study explores first year law students’ motivation in forming peer mentoring relationships and the roles peer mentors play in students’ lives. Analyses of survey and focus group data collected from 203 first-year law students at 11 institutions reveal that the majority rely on peer support, forming formal, informal, and “organizational” peer mentoring relationships. Relationship formation is motivated by students’ acknowledged need …

Serving State Officers In Official-Capacity Suits: Is Mail An Option?, Mark R. Brown

Mark R. Brown

How does one serve a state agent sued in his or her official capacity? The answer is unclear. I argue that historically suits of this nature have been treated as if the state agent is an individual; hence, individual service has proved the historical norm. However, over the course of the last 25 years a significant minority of courts have begun treating state agents as states. The rules for serving states and individuals differ; in particular, mail is not an option for states. Treating these Ex parte Young suits as suits against states therefore prevents service by mail. I argue …

“You’Re Creating New Categories:” Anglo-American Radical Feminism’S Constitutionalism In The Streets, Yxta M. Murray

Yxta M. Murray

In this paper, I examine the constitutional meaning of two political protests: The 1968 Miss America protest by New York Radical Women and the 1970 British radical feminist protest of the Miss World competition in London. Using the work of Reva Siegel, Jack Balkin, and Lynda G. Dodd as a foundation for my inquiry into how these social movement protests influenced constitutional culture concerning women's rights, I first engage in historical and social analyses of the protests themselves. In particular, I study the different approaches the U.S. and British feminists had to using lawbreaking, violence, and other outrageous acts in …

“You’Re Creating New Categories:” Anglo-American Radical Feminism’S Constitutionalism In The Streets, Yxta M. Murray

Yxta M. Murray

In "You’re Creating New Categories:" Anglo-American Radical Feminism’s Constitutionalism in the Streets, I examine the constitutional meaning of two political protests: The 1968 Miss America protest by New York Radical Women and the 1970 British radical feminist protest of the Miss World competition in London. Using the work of Reva Siegel, Jack Balkin, and Lynda G. Dodd as a foundation for my inquiry into how these social movement protests influenced constitutional culture concerning women's rights, I first engage in historical and social analyses of the protests themselves. In particular, I study the different approaches the U.S. and British feminists had …

Getting Away With Murder (Most Of The Time): A Sesquicentennial Analysis Of Civil War Era Homicide Cases In Boone County, Missouri, Frank O. Bowman Iii

Frank O. Bowman III

In the quarter century centered on the Civil War, 1850-1875, fifty-three homicide cases came before the courts of Boone County, Missouri, of which Columbia, home of the University of Missouri, is the county seat. To remarkable degree, the story of these killings, told in this article, is a chronicle of the place and period.

The article’s method might be described as “murder as social history.” Its narrative thread is an effort to explain the remarkable fact that only twelve of the fifty-three defendants charged with murder were ever convicted of any form of criminal homicide. The explanation requires an introduction …

Religious Freedom In Private Lawsuits: Untangling When Rfra Applies To Suits Involving Only Private Parties, Sara Lunsford Kohen

Sara Kohen

Religious Freedom in Private Lawsuits: Untangling When RFRA Applies to Suits Involving Only Private Parties, for publication discusses when courts should apply the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (“RFRA”) in cases in which the federal government is not a party. Congress passed RFRA in reaction to the Supreme Court’s decision in Employment Division v. Smith. The Court held in Smith that the Constitution does not require religious exemptions from neutral, generally applicable laws—those that do not target religion and cover non-religious conduct to the same extent as religious conduct. By contrast, RFRA allows a federal law to substantially burden a religious …

Segregated Poverty And The Constitutional Right To Equal Access To Middle Income Peers, Derek W. Black

Derek W. Black

Concentrated poverty in public schools continues to be a leading determinate of the educational opportunities that minority students receive. Since the effective end of mandatory desegregation, advocates have lacked legal tools to address it. As an alternative, some advocates and scholars have attempted to incorporate the concerns of concentrated poverty and racial segregation into educational litigation under state constitutions, but these efforts have not taken hold. Thus, all that has remained for students in poor and minority schools is the hope that school finance litigation could direct sufficient resources to mitigate their plight. This Article offers a better solution. Rather …

When A Jury Can’T Say No: Presumed Damages For Constitutional Torts, Anthony Disarro

Anthony DiSarro

Although the Supreme Court has twice rejected presumed damages as a remedy for constitutional violations, the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit has endorsed the remedy at least for certain constitutional torts that result in a “loss of liberty”. Presumed damages for constitutional wrongs is difficult to reconcile with much of our present remedial jurisprudence. The remedy seems contrary to Supreme Court pronouncements that compensatory damages are be the primary means to obtain a monetary remedy for injuries sustained from constitutional violations, and that nominal damages should be awarded when no such damages are proved. Presuming damages represents an …

Gray Matters: Autism, Impairment, And The End Of Binaries, Kevin M. Barry

Kevin M Barry

First diagnosed by psychiatrist Leo Kanner in 1943, Autism has exploded into the public consciousness in recent years. From science to science fiction, academia to popular culture, Autism has captured the world’s attention and imagination. Autism has also ignited a fierce debate among stakeholders who seek to define its essence. Many parents of Autistic children regard Autism as a scourge and press for a cure. The Neurodiversity Movement, comprised mostly of Autistic adults, regards Autism as a different way of being worthy of respect and even celebration. The Autism war is well underway and, given Autism’s swelling ranks and proposed …

Individual Mandates: A Founder-Approved Means Under The Necessary And Proper Clause, Eli Alcaraz

Eli A Alcaraz

The Affordable Health Care Act’s (“ACA”) individual mandate requiring most Americans to purchase healthcare was challenged as unconstitutional even before the ACA was passed. Challengers to the ACA assert that the federal government has never been allowed to force an individual to make a purchase from a private entity and that the ACA’s requirement that an individual do so is unconstitutional. This Comment takes issue with those asserting that an “individual mandate” is a contemporary invention and unconstitutional. As a matter of fact, there is at least one historical example where the federal government has forced individuals to makes purchases …

Gray Matters: Autism, Impairment, And The End Of Binaries, Kevin M. Barry

Kevin M Barry

First diagnosed by psychiatrist Leo Kanner in 1943, Autism has exploded into the public consciousness in recent years. From science to science fiction, academia to popular culture, Autism has captured the world’s attention and imagination. Autism has also ignited a fierce debate among stakeholders who seek to define its essence. Many parents of Autistic children regard Autism as a scourge and press for a cure. The Neurodiversity Movement, comprised mostly of Autistic adults, regards Autism as a different way of being worthy of respect and even celebration. The Autism war is well underway and, given Autism’s swelling ranks and proposed …

Tattoos, Tickets And Other Tawdry Behavior: How Universities Use Federal Law To Hide Their Scandals, Meg Penrose

Meg Penrose

Please find attached a copy of my recently completed article entitled Tattoos, Tickets and Other Tawdry Behavior: How Universities Use Federal Law to Hide Their Scandals. The article challenges the manner in which schools and their athletic departments invert a federal student privacy law, FERPA, to protect unseemly behavior and athletic scandals. Four case studies are presented: the University of Maryland and one athlete's accumulation of over $8,200 in parking fines; North Carolina University's athletic department scandal involving parking tickets and improper benefits (for which, just yesterday, the head football coach was fired and the Athletic Director resigned); Florida State …

Cognitive Illiberalism And Debiasing Strategies, Paul Secunda

Paul M. Secunda

Legal realist scholars of a generation ago posited that judicial perception of facts reflect previously-held values and assumptions rather than record evidence. Yet crucially those scholars did not describe the psychological mechanism by which judges’ values come to shape facts. Understanding the psychological mechanism, culturally-motivated cognition, is a necessary first step to counteract the impact of cognitive illiberalism. Cognitive illiberalism results from the manner in which legal decisionmakers explain their decisions, and how those explanations are processed by “losers” in the politico-legal wars of our society. The phenomenon of cognitive illiberalism delegitimizes legal decisions and causes societal discontent with the …

Doma’S Bankruptcy, Mark Strasser

Mark Strasser

Over the past few years, several federal courts have suggested or held that section three of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) violates constitutional guarantees. The courts have differed, however, both with respect to the appropriate standard of review and with respect to the particular constitutional guarantees that the section allegedly violates. Ironically, the resolution of these debates may ultimately have less import for the constitutionality of the section at issue than for the constitutionality of DOMA’s full faith and credit section and for the constitutionality of state same-sex marriage bans. This article addresses the constitutionality of section three of …

The Supreme Court’S Open-Ended Protection Against Third-Party Retaliation, Jessica Fink

Jessica Fink

For a number of years, courts have struggled with how to treat claims of “third party retaliation” – situations where an employee engages in some protected activity for purposes of Title VII, but where the employer retaliates not against that employee, but rather against one of his/her coworkers. Until very recently, federal courts arrived at varying conclusions regarding the viability of third-party retaliation claims under Title VII. However, in January 2011 decision, the U.S. Supreme Court finally weighed in on this issue, holding in Thompson v. North American Stainless, LP that Title VII would bar employers from engaging in third-party …

Sacrificing Massiah: Confusion Over Exlusion And Erosion Of The Right To Counsel, James J. Tomkovicz

james j tomkovicz

ABSTRACT: “Sacrificing Massiah: Confusion Over Exclusion and Erosion of the Right to Counsel” - James J. Tomkovicz “Sacrificing Massiah” examines the legitimacy and impacts of Kansas v. Ventris’s explanation of the Massiah “exclusionary rule.” It first traces the cryptic development of Massiah’s right to counsel-based suppression doctrine through a series of post-Massiah opinions. It then discusses Ventris—the first definitive explanation of the justifications for barring admissions deliberately elicited from uncounseled defendants. The Ventris Court classified Massiah suppression as a mere deterrent safeguard designed to prevent pretrial counsel deprivations and denied that defendants have the personal right not to be convicted …

Admissibility Of Investigatory Reports In § 1983 Civil Rights Actions - A User's Manual, Martin A. Schwartz

Martin A. Schwartz

No abstract provided.

Addendum: Civil Rights In Jeopardy, Martin A. Schwartz, Eileen Kaufman

Martin A. Schwartz

No abstract provided.

The Competing Claims Of Canon And Civil Law To Accessing Diocesan Secret Archives, Stephen Braunlich

Stephen Braunlich

The fallout from Catholic clerics’ sexual abuse of children has continued, despite the best efforts of bishops to respond effectively, and has led to ongoing criminal and civil actions. Central to the protracted fights have been questions of compelled disclosure of diocesan secret archives: What records did the Church keep? Can they be discovered? Does the First Amendment provide protection? What is the role of privilege? Does the public have a right to everyman’s evidence, or is some protected because it comes from a religious organization? I ultimately conclude that while the rules of discovery and evidence do not protect …

“Charitable” Discrimination: Why Taxpayers Should Not Have To Fund 501(C)(3) Organizations That Discriminate Against Lgbt Employees, Austin R. Caster

Austin R Caster

Until now, the first amendment protection of religious liberty has allowed—and even publicly funded—discrimination against LGBT employees, but this article argues that Christian Legal Society v. Martinez changes that analysis. According to Bob Jones University v. United States, organizations that base admissions decisions on racial discrimination violate public policy and cannot receive taxpayer funding. Similarly, Christian Legal Society v. Martinez shows us that universities do not have to fund student organizations that discriminate on the basis of sexual orientation. Therefore, because discrimination based on an immutable minority trait bars taxpayer funding in one instance, this article argues it should also …

Individual Liberty And Self-Determination, Fabio Macioce

Fabio Macioce

In this essay I will try to demonstrate that the principle of self-determination is based on a formal and individualistic view of liberty rights. I also propose a different perspective that takes into account the relationships rather than the individual. I will show how this result can only be achieved through a different ascription of rights to individuals: in particular, I will try to demonstrate 1) that any social practices express specific values​​, 2) that these values ​​are the result of historical and cultural circumstances, 3) that they are subject to an ongoing public debate, and finally 4) that only …

Face-Recognition Surveillance: A Moment Of Truth For Fourth Amendment Rights In Public Places, Douglas Fretty

Douglas A Fretty

Americans are increasingly monitored with face-recognition technology (FRT), a surveillance tool that allows the state to identify a pedestrian based on a pre-existing database of facial photographs. This Article argues that FRT embodies the fundamental Fourth Amendment dilemmas raised by contemporary digital surveillance and will serve as harbinger for the Amendment’s future. FRT cases will test whether people retain a reasonable expectation of privacy in their identities when they move in public, and whether the aggregation of information about a person’s movements amounts to an unreasonable search. Further, the suspicionless identification of pedestrians will test whether a seizure can occur …

Bridging The Law School Learning Gap Through Universal Design, Jennifer Ryan

Jennifer Ryan

Bridging the Law School Learning Gap through Universal Design

By Jennifer Jolly-Ryan

Abstract

Universal Design was first applied by architects to make buildings more accessible and useable to people with disabilities. Taken a step further into the law school classroom, Universal Design offers law professors an exciting opportunity to bridge the law school learning gap and accommodate a greater variety of law students. A good Universal Design of instruction in the law school classroom benefits not only student with disabilities, but other diverse groups including part-time law students, ESL law students, and law students with diverse learning styles.

Designing law …

The Niqab In The Courtroom: Protecting Free Exercise Of Religion In A Post-Smith World, Adam Schwartzbaum

Adam Schwartzbaum

The niqab has become enmeshed in heated political controversy all across the world. In the United States, the situation of Ginnah Muhammad exemplifies the complex legal issues arising from conflicts between individuals whose religious beliefs compel this practice and the secular state. Muhammad, an African-American Muslim woman, was ejected from a Michigan small claims court for refusing to remove her veil while testifying. This Comment explores the constitutionality of this action, and a subsequent amendment to the Michigan Rules of Evidence passed in response to her case giving judges the power to “exercise reasonable control over parties and witnesses." Inevitably, …

Fatal Backlash: Advocating The Right To Die In America, Gehan D. Gunatilleke Mr.

Gehan D Gunatilleke Mr.

The emerging issue of an individual’s right to physician-assisted suicide presents a fascinating ethical, clinical and legal challenge. The normative distinction between physician-assisted suicide and other manifestations of the right to die is virtually negligible, since the traditional dichotomies relating to the ‘active’ and the ‘passive’, ‘acts’ and ‘omissions’, and ‘intention’ and ‘knowledge’, are unpersuasive in the context of prohibiting physician-assisted suicide alone. This paper critically analyzes American discourse on physician-assisted suicide both in the public policy and constitutional law spheres and concludes that the real opposition to the practice derives from the moral preferences of society. Given the actual …