Law Commons^™

"Fair And Equitable" Distribution Of Voting Power Under The Public Utility Holding Company Act Of 1935, Leo W. Leary

Michigan Law Review

In the Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935 Congress gave the Securities and Exchange Commission the task of investigating voting power distribution among security holders in electric and gas holding companies and their subsidiaries. If the Commission finds that the corporate structure or continued existence of any company in a holding company system "unfairly or inequitably" distributes voting power among the investors in the system, it is the Commission's duty to order the offending corporation to take "such steps as the Commission shall find necessary" to cure this condition. This paper is an attempt to ascertain what the Commission …

Civil Procedure - Compensation Of Witnesses In A Civil Action, David W. Belin S.Ed.

Michigan Law Review

As the amount and complexity of litigation has increased, there have been corresponding increases in demands for added compensation of witnesses. Like the juror, the witness often receives the time-honored answer that he cannot be heard to complain that his compensation is inadequate; the administration of justice is a mutual benefit to all members of the community, and each is under a public duty to further it.

At common law witnesses received no compensation. Time spent in testifying was held to be claimed by the public as a tax, paid by the witness to the system of law which protected …

Insurance - Insurer's Right Of Restitution For (1) Excessive Payment Made In Discharge Of The Liability Of A Coinsurer And (2) Costs Of Defense, John W. Hupp S.Ed.

Michigan Law Review

The increasing use of the "pro rata" or "other insurance" clause in liability insurance policies has given rise to new instances of coinsurer relationships. Such a clause typically provides that the insurer will not be liable under its policy for a greater proportion of any loss than the applicable limit of liability of its policy bears to the total applicable limit of all valid and collectible insurance against such loss. It has been frequently stated that the existence of such clauses in two policies covering the same loss renders the liability under each of the policies several and not joint, …

Constitutional Law - Public Trial In Criminal Cases, Carl S. Krueger S.Ed.

Michigan Law Review

The criminal trial has been traditionally open to the public in Anglo-Saxon procedure, as it was in Roman and other civilized societies of an earlier time. The public trial of today, however, has been subjected to considerable criticism on the ground that there is a tendency for criminal trials to degenerate into public spectacles, frequently interrupting the orderly procedure of justice, and not infrequently actually prejudicing the accused. If no useful purpose is served by the presence of the idle public during the deadly serious determination of guilt or innocence, should not the judge, subject to the right of admittance …

Civil Procedure - Judgments - Res Judicata Effect Of Declaratory Judgments, Robert G. Russell S.Ed..

Michigan Law Review

In a former action brought pursuant to the Colorado Declaratory Judgment Act, plaintiff was declared to have the right to use a certain roadway as dedicated and defendant was enjoined from interfering with or obstructing plaintiff's use of the same. Thereafter, plaintiff brought the present action to recover damages allegedly resulting from defendant's blockading of the road prior to the bringing of the former action. On appeal from a judgment for plaintiff, held, reversed. Where, as here, the damages were antecedent and might with propriety have been determined in the same proceeding in which the declaratory judgment alone was …

Civil Procedure - Service Of Process Under Nonresident Motorist Statute - Effect Of Death Of Nonresident Defendant, Warren K. Urbom S.Ed..

Michigan Law Review

A wife sued for the wrongful death of her husband, which was allegedly caused by a nonresident defendant's negligent operation of his automobile on a Wisconsin highway while the plaintiff's husband was a passenger therein. Service of process was made on the Commissioner of the Motor Vehicle Department in Wisconsin, and copies of the summons and complaint were mailed to defendant in Illinois in accordance with the Wisconsin nonresident motorist statute. Shortly thereafter, before a judgment was rendered, defendant died. Plaintiff sought to revive the action against defendant's administrator by serving notice of the filing of a petition for revival …

Constitutional Law - Commerce Clause - State Statute Requiring Interstate Motor Carrier To Secure A Permit, Marvin O. Young S.Ed.

Michigan Law Review

Petitioner brought an action in an Arkansas state court to enjoin enforcement of a state statute which required all contract carriers using the highways of the state to secure a permit from the state Public Service Commission. The Arkansas Supreme Court found that five driver-owners who had been arrested while transporting petitioner's product in interstate commerce without such a permit were "contract carriers" within the meaning of the statute. Neither petitioner nor any of the drivers had applied for a state permit. Under the terms of the statute, granting of the permit was contingent on certain factors, such as the …

Labor Law - Removal Jurisdiction Of Federal Courts - Action To Enjoin Secondary Boycott, George B. Berridge S.Ed.

Michigan Law Review

Plaintiff, a Michigan trucking company subject to the LMRA, brought suit in a Michigan court against defendant, a local of the Teamsters Union, for an injunction and $50,000 damages. Plaintiff alleged that defendant's conduct in attempting to coerce plaintiff's employees to become members of the Teamsters Union was an illegal combination and conspiracy under Michigan law and a violation of the Michigan antitrust laws. Defendant removed the case to a federal district court on the theory that certain specific acts alleged by plaintiff would constitute an unlawful secondary boycott under the LMRA and that plaintiff had therefore stated a cause …

Sales - Uniform Trust Receipts Act - Strict Requirement Of Accuracy In Designating Trustee In Filing Under The Act, John W. Hupp S.Ed.

Michigan Law Review

Plaintiff and E. R. Millen Co., Inc., entered into a financing arrangement whereby plaintiff agreed to finance the wholesale purchase of various types of electrical appliances by E. R. Millen Co., Inc. Plaintiff promptly recorded a statement of trust receipt financing setting forth that the plaintiff "is or expects to be engaged in financing under trust receipt transactions the acquisitions by the trustee, E. R. Millen Company." The statement then designated the trustee's business address. This trust receipts arrangement was in operation for about a year when E. R. Millen Co., Inc., made a general assignment of all of its …

Securities - Application Of Antideficiency Judgment Statute To Second Purchase Money Trust Deed Where Security Is Exhausted By Foreclosure Of First Deed, John Houck S.Ed.

Michigan Law Review

To secure the purchase price of land, defendant executed a promissory note and first deed of trust in favor of a savings and loan association, and a second note and deed in favor of plaintiff-vendor. On default of both obligations, the savings and loan association foreclosed upon the land. The resulting sale completely exhausted the security, and plaintiff brought the present action upon his note. Defendant interposed section 580b of the California Code of Civil Procedure, which specifies that "no deficiency judgment shall lie in any event after any sale of real property for failure of the purchaser to complete …

Taxation - Federal Income Tax - Consequences To Seller And Buyer Of Covenant Not To Compete, Richard B. Barnett S.Ed.

Michigan Law Review

The owners of the entire capital stock of a newspaper business received an offer of $1,000,000 for their stock and a covenant not to compete with buyers for ten years. After the offer was accepted and the contract of sale drawn up, buyer asked for a clause in the contract evaluating the covenant not to compete at $50 a share and the stock at $150 a share in order to help him taxwise. The clause was accepted with little discussion. The sellers reported the entire proceeds of the sale on their income tax returns as long term capital gain, but …

Taxation - Federal Income Tax - Exemplary Damages As Taxable Income To Recipient, Eliot Gerber S.Ed.

Michigan Law Review

Petitioner, a motion picture exhibitor, sued certain motion picture distributors under the private remedy provisions of the federal antitrust acts. Judgment was had against the distributors for treble damages. Upon failure of petitioner to report as income the amount recovered above its actual loss of profits, the Commissioner determined deficiencies in petitioner's income tax. Held, the amount recovered above actual loss of profits was exemplary damages and not taxable income. William Goldman Theatres, Inc., 19 T.C. 637 (1953).

Notes, Michigan Law Review

Michigan Law Review

The information given in the notes is derived from inspection of the books, publishers' literature, and the ordinary library sources.

Constitutional Law-Aliens-Power To Exclude And Deny Hearing, Lois H. Hambro S.Ed.

Michigan Law Review

In two similar cases, petitioners sought a writ of habeas corpus from federal district courts in order to obtain release from federal immigration authorities. Both were aliens who had been lawful permanent residents at the time they left the country. Mezei had allegedly gone abroad to visit his dying mother, and his return to the United States had been delayed by difficulty in securing an exit permit. Kwong Hai Chew had left the country to sail aboard a vessel of American registry, prior to which he had been screened by the United States Coast Guard. He had also served in …

Labor Law-Labor-Management Relations Act-Anti-Featherbedding Provision, Walter H. Weiner S.Ed.

Michigan Law Review

The typographers union insisted that newspaper publishers, upon using advertising mats as molds for metal castings from which to print advertisements, pay typesetters, at regular rates, for setting up duplicate forms for such advertisements in the same manner as though mats were not used, which duplicate forms are ordinarily melted down without having been used. The musicians union insisted that a theater employ a local orchestra, as a condition of the union's consent to the local appearance of traveling bands, to play overtures, intermissions and chasers. The publishers association and the theater challenged these demands as attempts to exact payments …

Common Carrier Liability In The Atomic Age: The Cummins Amendment To The Interstate Commerce Act, Anthony F. Arpaia, Clarence G. Jensen

Michigan Law Review

Any discussion of carriers' liability for goods transported by them necessarily begins with the famous case of Coggs v. Bernard. There Lord Holt two hundred and fifty years ago stated the obligation of carriers to their patrons in language which has lost none of its force and clarity by the lapse of time.

Constitutional Law-Freedom Of Assembly-Equal Protection Of The Law, S. I. Shuman

Michigan Law Review

The ordinance here involved prohibited any person from addressing a political or religious meeting in any public park. At a meeting involving no disturbances or breaches of the peace, plaintiff, a Jehovah's Witness, was arrested when he addressed a meeting in a public park. The state supreme court upheld a conviction under the ordinance. Held, reversed. The principal case is on all fours with Niemotko v. Maryland. The state conceded at oral argument that the meeting was a religious one and that the ordinance as construed and applied did not prohibit church services in the park. Therefore, since …

Criminal Law-Application Of Murder-Felony Doctrine Where Homicide Was The Act Of A Non-Participant In The Felony, Edgar A. Strause S.Ed.

Michigan Law Review

The appellant and another entered a filling station for the purpose of committing an armed robbery, held up those present, and then separated in search of money after the owner had refused to disclose its location. The unarmed deceased, a friend of the owner, attacked the appellant in an effort to frustrate the robbery. A brief struggle followed during which the deceased obtained possession of the appellant's pistol and struck appellant on the head with it, thereby causing the accidental discharge of the bullet which killed him. The appellant was convicted of murder. On appeal, held, affirmed. The alleged …

On Amending The Treaty-Making Power: A Comparative Study Of The Problem Of Self-Executing Treaties, Lawrence Preuss

Michigan Law Review

The current furor concerning the treaty-making power of the United States has been aroused by the apprehension that this country might become a party to certain multilateral treaties in the social and economic fields, and, notably, the draft Covenants on Human Rights, the Genocide Convention and the Convention on Political Rights of Women. The plethora of proposed constitutional amendments now before the Congress merely marks an intensification of the controversy, recurrent throughout our history, concerning the legal effect of Article VI, Section 2, of the Constitution of the United States. Problems concerning the relative authority of treaties and other international …

Summary Judgment Under The Federal Rules When An Issue Of Fact Is Presented, Mac Asbill, Willis B. Snell

Michigan Law Review

Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure introduced to federal practice the summary judgment procedure, which had been developed previously in England and several of the states. The scope of rule 56 is the broadest possible, since the rule provides that any party may move for a summary judgment in any type of civil action. Rule 56(c) provides that the court shall grant a motion for summary judgment "if the pleadings, depositions, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving …

Constitutional Law-Validity Of New York Statute Setting Out Motorists' Implied Consent To Chemical Tests For Intoxication, Richard A. Shupe S.Ed.

Michigan Law Review

The State of New York has approved a statute, to go into effect July 1, 1953, which stipulates that any person who operates a motor vehicle or motorcycle in the state shall be deemed to have given his consent to chemical tests of his breath, blood, urine, or saliva for the purpose of determining the alcoholic content of his blood. If such a person refuses to allow the tests, they will not be made, but the commissioner shall revoke his license or permit to drive, including the nonresident operating privilege. This is the first statute of its type and merits …

Executive Agreements And The Proposed Constitutional Amendments To The Treaty Power, John F. Spindler S.Ed.

Michigan Law Review

The advent of the present administration has brought into full bloom a hardy perennial among the annual crop of proposed constitutional amendments. The emergence of the United States from World War II as the leader of the free nations of the world and distrust of the rapid expansion of executive power under the Roosevelt Administration have given impetus to a movement to check any further expansion of the presidential power to conduct our foreign relations. In addition, many people are alarmed by the possibility that this country might become a party to international agreements which would operate to alter or …

Labor Law-State Regulation Of Recognition And Organizational Picketing, Richard D. Rohr S.Ed.

Michigan Law Review

Just as the fixed circumference of spheres of influence tends to reduce clash and friction in world affairs, so peaceful industrial relations are fostered by definite legal rules of conduct. Recent litigation, both by its amount and variety of result, testifies to a continued uncertainty as to the permissible scope of peaceful, primary picketing. The major problems may be subsumed under the loose category of "stranger picketing," but a distinction of some legal significance has developed within this category between picketing by the non-representative union for recognition by the employer and picketing for organizational purposes, that is, to win the …

Constitutional Law-Review Of State Court Determination-Supreme Court's Vacation Of State Court Judgment Without Giving Grounds For Reversal, Marcus A. Rowden S.Ed.

Michigan Law Review

The Supreme Court of the United States granted plaintiff's petition for certiorari to review a decision of the Supreme Court of California summarily denying plaintiff's application for habeas corpus. Previously the cause had been continued to enable petitioner to secure a determination of the California Supreme Court as to whether its judgment was intended to rest on an adequate independent state ground. It was later held that a letter from the clerk of that court was not a sufficient determination of that question, and petitioner was still unable to obtain that determination. Held, judgment of the Supreme Court of …

Corporations-Appointment Of Receiver Solely For The Purpose Of Bringing Suit, William A. Bain, Jr. S.Ed.

Michigan Law Review

An ex parte petition was filed by a minority stockholder of a foreign corporation requesting the appointment of a special receiver for certain claims of the corporation against resident fiduciaries. The claims, which had not been prosecuted by the corporation, were about to be barred by the statute of limitations. A receiver was appointed and brought suit. The corporation appeared specially requesting that the order be set aside. Held, motion denied. A court of equity has inherent power to appoint a receiver for the assets of a foreign corporation in an ex parte proceeding instituted by a minority stockholder. …

Taxation-Federal Estate Tax-Taxability Of Joint And Survivor Annuity Paid Pursuant To Pension Plan, Lawrence M. De Vore S.Ed.

Michigan Law Review

Under a pension and retirement plan, decedent had the option of receiving a pension for life or a smaller pension while both he and his wife lived, with two-thirds of such reduced pension payable to the survivor for life. On decedent's normal retirement date he chose the latter. Decedent did not retire but continued working until his death. His wife was then entitled to receive a monthly income for life under the pension plan. The Commissioner of Internal Revenue determined that the value of the wife's annuity should be included in the decedent's gross estate. Plaintiff instituted action for refund …

Taxation - Federal Income Tax-What Constitutes Accident Or Health Insurance Under Section 22(B)(5)-, Marvin O. Young

Michigan Law Review

Plaintiff brought this action to recover federal income tax paid by him for the year 1945 on a sum of $1800 which plaintiff received from his employer pursuant to a "free" sickness benefits plan which plaintiff's employer had in effect, claiming that this amount was excludable from gross income under section 22(b)(5) as "amounts received through accident or health insurance." Plaintiff's employer was an insurance company with authority to write health and accident insurance, and "free" protection was given to all full-time salaried home and branch office employees who could pass a satisfactory medical examination. Many ordinary features of a …

Skeie: Odelsretten Og Aseteretten, Nils B. Skavang

Michigan Law Review

A Review of ODELSRETTEN OG ASETERETTEN By Jon Skeie.

Constitutional Law-Appellate Jurisdiction Over State Court Decisions-When Is A State Court Decision "Final", Marcus A. Rowden S.Ed.

Michigan Law Review

Plaintiff brought suit to enjoin peaceful picketing of an apartment project by defendant labor organizations. The Circuit Court, Montgomery County, Alabama granted temporary injunction ex parte. Defendants appealed to the Alabama Supreme Court which affirmed the trial court's order denying a motion to dissolve the injunction. Certiorari was sought and granted by the United States Supreme Court. Held, certiorari had been improvidently granted since the Alabama Supreme Court's determination had not constituted a final judgment or decree. Montgomery Bldg. and Constr. Trades Council v. Ledbetter Erection Co.,. 344 U.S. 178, 73 S.Ct. 196 (1952).

Corporations--Officers And Agents-Authority Of Manager To Enter Into A Lifetime Employment Contract, Peter Van Domelen S.Ed.

Michigan Law Review

In 1924, the plaintiff, while working as an employee of the defendant corporation, suffered an injury which resulted in the loss of his leg. During his period of convalescence the plaintiff was visited by the district superintendent of the defendant corporation and was assured that the corporation would pay for his medical expenses and furnish him with a lifetime job in exchange for his promise to forbear from suit. Upon recovery, the plaintiff returned to work and served the defendant in various capacities until 1949, at which time he was discharged without cause. The plaintiff brought an action to recover …