Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Judges (15)
- Courts (4)
- Supreme Court (4)
- Constitutional Law (3)
- New York (3)
-
- Bias (2)
- Citation (2)
- Defense (2)
- Diversity (2)
- Feminist judgments (2)
- Judicial behavior (2)
- Judicial opinions (2)
- Judicial selection (2)
- Legal History (2)
- Trials (2)
- Wisconsin (2)
- ABA (1)
- Advocacy (1)
- American legal profession (1)
- Anastasoff (1)
- Attitudinal (1)
- Book review (1)
- Brennan (1)
- Cardozo (1)
- Case publication (1)
- Case reporters (1)
- Climate change (1)
- Confirmation hearings (1)
- Confirmations (1)
- Cultural competence (1)
Articles 31 - 33 of 33
Full-Text Articles in Law
Benjamin N. Cardozo: Sixty Years After His Appointment As New York's Chief Judge, Jay C. Carlisle
Benjamin N. Cardozo: Sixty Years After His Appointment As New York's Chief Judge, Jay C. Carlisle
Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications
Sixty years after his appointment as Chief Judge of the New York State Court of Appeals, Benjamin N. Cardozo’s place in history as one of the country's most outstanding jurists and preeminent legal philosophers is secure. He is· widely acclaimed for being a successful practitioner, a brilliant legal scholar and a man who is ranked among the preeminent American judges, along with Marshall, Kent, Story and Holmes. He was a giant of his era who, while spending all but six years of his professional life in New York, exerted a powerful national influence upon his own times.
Ex Parte Communication By The Judiciary, Jay C. Carlisle
Ex Parte Communication By The Judiciary, Jay C. Carlisle
Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications
The recent establishment of an Individual Assignment System in New York has introduced what one commentator has referred to as new "rules of the game". Nonetheless, the old rules still apply with respect to ex parte communication by judges which is governed by Canon 3(A)( 4) of the Code of Judicial Conduct. Canon 3(A)(4), as adopted by the New York State Bar Association in 1973, prohibits a judge from initiating or considering ex parte communications concerning a pending or impending proceeding. This prohibition, which has been strictly construed by decisional law and bar association advisory opinions, has new significance under …
The American Bar Association And The Supreme Court--Old Wine In A New Bottle?, Ronald H. Jensen
The American Bar Association And The Supreme Court--Old Wine In A New Bottle?, Ronald H. Jensen
Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications
Preparation of this article was commenced shortly after the emergence of the difference of opinion between the ABA and the City Bar on the practice of submitting the names of Supreme Court nominees to the ABA. We believed this to be a sufficiently important issue to deserve a thorough review, particularly because of a paucity of legal commentary on the subject. Our major attention is still directed to that issue, but the recent action of the Attorney General necessarily requires some expansion of the scope of this inquiry. We confine this study to the matter of selection of Supreme Court …