Law Commons^™

Tentative Oral Opinions: Improving Oral Argument Without Spending A Dime, Joshua Stein

The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process

No abstract provided.

Sentence Appeals In England: Promoting Consistent Sentencing Through Robust Appellate Review, Briana Lynn Rosenbaum

The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process

No abstract provided.

Lake View – A Roadmap For Asserting The Rights Of The Jailed Mentally Ill, Bettina Brownstein

University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review

No abstract provided.

Avoiding The Unavoidable: The Canon Of Constitutional Avoidance As Applied To The Patient Protection And Affordable Care Act, T. J. Fosko

University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review

No abstract provided.

Breaking Down The Supreme Court’S Spending Clause Ruling In Nfib V. Sebelius: A Huge Blow To The Federal Government Or A Mere Bump In The Road?, Ellen K. Howard

University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review

No abstract provided.

Foreword—A Student Symposium On National Federation Of Independent Business V. Sebelius, Joshua M. Silverstein

University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review

No abstract provided.

Civil Procedure—Be More Specific: Vague Precedents And The Differing Standards By Which To Apply “Arises Out Of Or Relates To” In The Test For Specific Personal Jurisdiction, Ryne H. Ballou

University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Right Of Privacy In Arkansas: A Progressive State, J. Lyn Entrikin

University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Patient Protection And Affordable Care Act: A Constitutional Analysis, David C. Jung

University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review

No abstract provided.

Let Them Eat . . . Broccoli?, Josie G. Richardson

University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review

No abstract provided.

Constitutional Law—Sixth Amendment—Braving Confrontation: Arkansas’S Progressive Position Regarding Criminal Defendants’ Confrontation Rights At Sentencing, Cassie R. Howell

University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Rise And Demise Of The Absolute Dominion Doctrine For Groundwater, Joseph W. Dellapenna

University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review

Increased human populations, together with increased per capita water usage and climate changes, have resulted in our planet coping with greater water shortages than ever before. Groundwater has played, and will continue to play, a critical role in dealing with water shortages. Consequently, more and more attention, legal and otherwise, is being given to groundwater across the United States.

Much legal confusion about groundwater exists. For starters, there is no single legal definition for groundwater. Moreover, the law has developed legal categories such as percolating water and underground streams which, while contradictory to scientific hydrology, remain embedded in the law. …

Still Fugacious After All These Years: A Sequel To The Basic Primer On Arkansas Oil And Gas Law, Thomas A. Daily, W. Christopher Barrier

University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review

This sequel to the authors' 2007 article, Fugacious 1, follows the same outline and considers the same topics as the original article while considering the major developments since Fugacious 1 was published. Whereas Fugacious 1 was a basic primer on Arkansas oil and gas law, this article supplements the development of Arkansas oil and gas law over the last five years through an overview of the litigation concerning the Fayetteville Shale Play. Specifically, the article expands on those topics covered by Fugacious 1 needing revision or supplementation, while simply noting as such the sections where no revision or supplementation is …

Civil Procedure—Property Improvement Claims—A History And Recommendation For Arkansas's Lone True Statute Of Repose, Luke K. Burton

University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review

Determining the proper defendant for construction defects is largely dependent on the timing of the defect. Particularly, the sooner the defect develops after completion, the more likely that someone involved in the construction process is responsible. However, as time passes from the completion of construction to the development of a problem, it is more likely that the problems are the result of ordinary wear and tear rather than defective design or construction. Ark. Code Ann. § 16-56-112 (Statute) was enacted to manage these issues of timing and responsibility for construction defects by providing that homeowners may not bring suit against …

Brady, Arkansas Rule 17.1, And Disclosure Of Scientific Evidence And Expert Opinion, J. Thomas Sullivan

University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review

The United States Constitution as well as state procedural rules require prosecutorial authorities to disclose evidence to the defense as a means for ensuring fairness in the prosecution of individuals charged with criminal offenses. When prosecutorial authorities fail to disclose evidence as required, the integrity of the criminal justice system is threatened and the defense is unable to adequately prepare for trial. This threat is illustrated and magnified by the substantiation of prosecutorial misconduct claims in high profile trials where prosecutors have been unable to resist the temptation not to disclose evidence that could damage the prosecution's case, or, where …

Consumer Financial Protection And Community Banks, John T. Adams

University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review

The Dodd-Frank Act (Dodd-Frank) was enacted following the 2007-2008 financial crisis as the result of calls in Washington to protect average Americans from the depredations of Wall Street. Specifically, proponents of Dodd-Frank pointed to greed, carried out through the business practices at large commercial and investment banks, as the cause of the financial crisis. Accordingly, Dodd-Frank sought to place the most stringent restrictions on the activities of large commercial and investment banks of any legislation since the Great Depression.

However, the perception of rapacious business practices on Wall Street does not apply as directly to community banks. Situated somewhere between …

Solidifying Arkansas's Liquidated Damage Law After S.O.G.-San-Ore-Gardner V. Missouri Pacific Railroad Co.: It's Not All Water Under The Bridge, David C. Jung

University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review

The construction of the Benzal Bridge over the White River in rural Arkansas brought about years of litigation between Missouri Pacific Railroad Company and contractor San Ore-Gardner, the crux of which was whether the liquidated damages provision in the parties' contract was enforceable. The liquidated damages provision at issue provided that San Ore-Gardner would be liable to Missouri Pacific Railroad Company for damages in the amount of $600 per day if performance of the contract was not completed within the specified time period. Although Missouri Pacific Railroad Company did contribute to the over two year delay in completion of the …