Law Commons^™

Dred Scott, John San(D)Ford, And The Case For Collusion, David T. Hardy

David T. Hardy

Dred Scott v. John F. A. Sandford was one of the most critical cases in Supreme Court history, “an astonisher,” as Lincoln phrased it. In the “Opinion of the Court,” which was not actually the opinion of the Court (parts of it mustered only three votes), Chief Justice Taney stretched to insulate slavery in every way manageable. The ruling became instead an application of the “law of unintended consequences.” It led to the rise of Abraham Lincoln (who devoted much of his “House Undivided” speech to it), the destruction of Stephen Douglas’ presidential campaign (since it held his core position …

Prison Visitation Policies: A Fifty State Survey, Chesa Boudin

Chesa Boudin

This paper presents a summary of the findings from the first fifty-state survey of prison visitation policies. Our research explores the contours of how prison administrators exercise their discretion to prescribe when and how prisoners may have contact with friends and family. Visitation policies impact recidivism, inmates’ and their families’ quality of life, public safety, and prison security, transparency and accountability. Yet many policies are inaccessible to visitors and researchers. Given the wide-ranging effects of visitation, it is important to understand the landscape of visitation policies and then, where possible, identify best practices and uncover policies that may be counterproductive …

After Privacy: The Rise Of Facebook, The Fall Of Wikileaks, And Singapore’S Personal Data Protection Act 2012, Simon Chesterman

Simon Chesterman

This article discusses the changing ways in which information is produced, stored, and shared — exemplified by the rise of social-networking sites like Facebook and controversies over the activities of WikiLeaks — and the implications for privacy and data protection. Legal protections of privacy have always been reactive, but the coherence of any legal regime has also been undermined by the lack of a strong theory of what privacy is. There is more promise in the narrower field of data protection. Singapore, which does not recognise a right to privacy, has positioned itself as an e-commerce hub but had no …

The European Social Charter And Its Implementation In The Republic Of Azerbaijan, Zaka Mirzayev

Zaka Mirzayev Zaka

In the article the European Social Charter, the core of the European social model is studied from the perspective of its potential implementation challenges in the Republic of Azerbaijan. Azerbaijan's efforts for the due fulfillment of the Charter obligations are analyzed in light of its legislation and legal practice, as well as in the context of the government’s relevant national reports that have been submitted to the Council of Europe up to day. Further, theoretical and practical problems impeding the treaty’s full implementation in the country are identified. The article also deals with issues relating to the Charter’s international and …

The Law Of Indicators On Women’S Human Rights: Unmet Promises And Global Challenges, Marta Infantino

Marta Infantino

Global indicators on human rights (HRs) aim to measure HRs scores against HRs standards. In other words, they aim to measure legal phenomena against legal benchmarks.

Despite HRs indicators’ reliance on legal knowledge, lawyers have so far neither made substantial contributions to their production, nor studied in depth the legal implications of their uses. The current state-of-the-art in the world of HRs indicators is the result of an ongoing process led by bureaucrats, economists, statisticians, and activists with limited legal training. It is these actors who are developing a new body of professional knowledge, and a new technology of governance …

Of Particles And Proportionality: Negotiating A Truce Between Humanitarian And Human Rights Principles In The Law Of Armed Conflict, Matt Meltzer

Matt Meltzer

The conflict between international humanitarian law (“IHL”) and human rights law (“HRL”) in the regulation of combat is one of the most hotly debated issues in the law of armed conflict. As human rights law has come into greater prominence over the past twenty years, international tribunals and non-government organizations have struggled with how to effectively integrate its principles with the longer-established strictures of international humanitarian law. Because human rights law would prohibit a large swathe of hostile conduct that international humanitarian law has long permitted, a conflict between these two fields is inevitable. At stake in this legal debate …

The Emergence Of Private Property Law In China And Its Impact On Human Rights, Mark D. Kielsgard, Lei Chen

Mark D. Kielsgard

ABSTRACT This article investigates the development of private property law in the PRC and its connection to the growth of human rights trends in China. It assesses the vitality of these trends, reviews the relevant historic legal and social background and demonstrates how the introduction of private property in China has fundamentally altered the fabric of its civil society. Drawing upon case studies and statutory analysis, and evaluating them from the perspective of both Chinese and Western scholarship, it analyzes trends driving greater democratic structures by reviewing the self-governance of condominium owners associations and the human rights practices they have …

Adding Insult To Indian Injury, Ryan Dreveskracht

Ryan Dreveskracht

No abstract provided.

Revictimizing Native Women For Politica Purposes, Ryan Dreveskracht

Ryan Dreveskracht

No abstract provided.

Does Justice Always Require Prosecution? The International Criminal Court And Transitional Justice Measures, Elizabeth B. Ludwin King

Elizabeth B Ludwin King

Two provisions of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (ICC), those regarding complementarity and discretion to decline “in the interests of justice,” give the ICC Prosecutor the ability to yield to a state that wants to undertake its own transitional justice program. Given the global preference for the imposition of individual criminal liability for serious international crimes, as evidenced by the creation of the ICC, it is highly likely that most such programs will involve prosecution. This Article asks whether the ICC Prosecutor might step aside when faced with a state that favors other mechanisms of accountability and …

Religion And The Equal Protection Clause, Steven G. Calabresi, Abe Salander

Steven G Calabresi

This article argues that state action that discriminates on the basis of religion is unconstitutional under the Equal Protection Doctrine even if it does not violate the Establishment Clause or the Free Exercise Clause as incorporated by the Fourteenth Amendment. State action that discriminates on the basis of religion should be subject to strict scrutiny and should almost always be held unconstitutional. We thus challenge the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Christian Legal Society v. Martinez in which a 5 to 4 majority of the Court wrongly allowed a California state school to discriminate against a Christian Legal Society chapter …

Death And Rehabilitation, Meghan J. Ryan

Meghan J. Ryan

While rehabilitation is reemerging as an important penological goal, the Supreme Court is eroding the long-revered divide between capital and non-capital sentences. This raises the question of whether and how rehabilitation applies in the capital context. Courts and scholars have long concluded that it does not—that death is completely irrelevant to rehabilitation. Yet, historically, the death penalty in this country has been imposed in large part to induce the rehabilitation of offenders’ characters. Additionally, there are tales of the worst offenders transforming their characters when they are facing death, and several legal doctrines are based on the idea that death …

Religion / State: Where The Separation Lies, Vincent Samar

Vincent J. Samar

The article traces the history of the establishment clause including various court tests that have been used to interpret it, discusses various contemporary justifications for the clause, and culls from those justifications why the “accommodationist” approach sometimes used by the Court must be rejected.

I then introduce the ethical Doctrine of Double Effect to reconsider other tests the Court has applied (total separation, endorsement, neutrality and coercion), ultimately to justify a new neutrality test that provides a clearer understanding of the principles behind non-establishment. I show how the new neutrality test could be used in resolving future cases, for example, …

A, B, & C V. Ireland: The Unborn And An Appreciation Of The Margin Of Appreciation, Shaun A. De Freitas Esq

Shaun A de Freitas esq

On December 16, 2010 the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights (“ECtHR”) in A, B, and C v. Ireland (“ABC”) found that it was not for the Court to decide on the validity of Ireland’s relevant legislation which prohibits abortions (except in instances where the pregnant woman’s life is threatened). According to ABC, the ‘margin of appreciation’ allows the Court to not take a specific view on matters related to the termination of the unborn. As expected, the ABC ruling received criticism from supporters of a more unlimited choice to be awarded to the pregnant woman in …

Towards Determining Legal Parentage By Agreement In Israel, Yehezkel Margalit

Hezi Margalit

In Israel as in other parts of the world, families, parenthood, and relations between parents and children have changed dramatically over the past few decades. So, too, developments in modern medicine have enhanced the ability to separate sexuality from fertility and parenthood. Many researchers feel that the legal system has not kept pace with these changes, and that traditional models of familial relationships no longer provide adequate tools for dealing with them. In order to bridge the gap between a desired social status and current law, a growing number of parents seek to regulate the status, rights, and obligations of …

Determining Legal Parenthood By Agreement As A Possible Solution To The Challenges Of The New Era, Yehezkel Margalit

Hezi Margalit

Over the past decades, we witnessed changes in the matrimonial and parenting institutions. Medical innovations have further created ethical-legal dilemmas. It is, therefore, essential to create a theory and framework that will determine ways to deal with the resulting dilemma in a fully developed manner. This paper surveys the current, conflicting shifts in family structure and the definition of legal parenthood. In it, I deal with the importance and various aspects of defining legal parenthood. I will also focus on the singularity of this dilemma as it is increasingly apparent in the various fertility treatments. I present the sociological-legal roots …

The European Social Charter And Its Implementation In The Republic Of Azerbaijan, Zaka Mirzayev Zaka

Zaka Mirzayev Zaka

In the article the European Social Charter, the core of the European social model is studied from the perspective of its potential implementation challenges in the Republic of Azerbaijan. Azerbaijan's efforts for due fulfillment of the Charter obligations are analyzed in light of its legislation and legal practice, as well as in the context of the government’s relevant national reports that have been submitted to the Council of Europe up to day. Further, theoretical and practical problems impeding the treaty’s full implementation in the country are identified. The article also deals with issues relating to the Charter’s international and domestic …

An Inconvenient Forum: Altering The Doctrine Of Forum Non Conveniens For Human Rights Claims Under The Alien Tort Statute, Lynn Ta

Lynn Ta

This Article proposes a new approach to the doctrine of forum non conveniens. Traditionally, forum non conveniens has been considered a non-merits decision that does not require a prior determination of subject matter jurisdiction. This Article argues that this approach significantly disadvantages foreign plaintiffs who bring human rights claims under the Alien Tort Statute because it quickly and automatically dismisses such cases without considering either the U.S. interest in adjudicating human rights cases or the gravity of human rights violations. Both these considerations should trump the more mechanical analysis conducted under the traditional forum non conveniens model. The central thesis …

The New Scheme For Foreign National Prisoners: Vigilance Is Key, Patrick Matthew Hassan-Morlai

Patrick Matthew Hassan-Morlai

The provision governing the Tariff Expired Removal Scheme (TERS) is contained in section 32A of the Crime (Sentences) Act 1997 as inserted by section 119 of the LASPO Act. In broad terms, TERS applies only to foreign national prisoners whom the secretary of state can remove from the UK if the foreign national prisoner is serving a life sentence that includes an IPP sentence, has served their minimum term, i.e. tariff, and is liable to removal from the UK. Section 119 adopts the definition of liability to removal from the UK in section 259 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003.

Should Assisted Dying Be Lawful?, Charles Olubokun Mr

Charles Olubokun Mr

Should Assisted Dying be lawful? This is a complex ethical and legal question, a delicate, emotive issue, turning the traffic light from red to green on state prohibited assisted dying would be a difficult task. The subject of assisted dying is highly controversial and opinions to legalise it are split.

China's Engagement With The Security Council, Christopher James Mccabe Holland

Christopher J M Holland

China’s engagement with the UN Security Council has received close attention since its veto of UN action in Syria. Some commentators have argued that this veto signals the beginning of a more aggressive and independent China, and is an indication of its resilience to western and foreign pressure. However, this paper argues that the significance of China’s resistance to UN action should not be overstated.

The proposed intervention in Syria, like in Libya, was justified in legal terms on the basis of the doctrine of the “responsibility to protect” (R2P). Since the genesis of this doctrine at the turn of …

Why Harlan Fiske Stone (Also) Matters, Eric H. Schepard

Eric H Schepard

Harlan Fiske Stone has been largely overlooked in the recent legal literature even though his legacy should influence how we resolve contemporary legal problems. This article examines Stone’s archived correspondence, his speeches and opinions, and numerous secondary sources to demonstrate why he is more important now than at any time since his death in 1946. As Attorney General from 1924-25, Stone’s decision to prohibit the Bureau of Investigation (BI, today’s FBI) from spying on domestic radicals established a framework that should guide the troublesome relationship between domestic intelligence and law enforcement that reemerged after September 11, 2001. As an Associate …

Transparency Between Norm, Technique And Property In International Law And Governance—The Example Of Corporate Disclosure Regimes And Environmental Impacts, Larry Cata Backer

Larry Cata Backer

This article considers the role of transparency in corporate governance, focusing on the regulatory forms in international environmental law and policy. It is divided into five sections. After this Introduction, Section II considers conventional sources of international environmental law for its transparency effects on the environmental impacts of business activity, looking at both hard law and soft law frameworks. While there is a substantial and growing body of public international hard and soft law frameworks in environmental governance, much of that is focused on the role of states and the information and participation rights of affected communities in the political …

Moral Disengagement Of Medical Providers: Another Clue To The Continued Neglect Of Treatable Pain, Kelly Dineen

Kelly Dineen

The neglect of treatable pain is an ongoing reality for patients in all health care settings despite decades of research, education, institutional and organizational initiatives and regulatory reform. Most recently the Accountable Care Act and the Institute of Medicine have called for further work to understand and correct the continued inadequate treatment of pain. To date, research has identified a variety of barriers to treatment from educational deficits to biases to regulatory scrutiny with little change in practice. Yet, very little research has addressed the social cognitive mechanisms used by providers who continue to undertreat pain. This article explores the …

Delayed Justice: A Case Study Of Texaco Arnd The Republic Of Ecuador’S Operations, Harms, And Possible Redress In The Ecuadorian Amazon, Suraj Patel

Suraj Patel

Multinational corporations engaging in natural resource extraction are often enticed by nascent foreign regulatory regimes and private dispute settlement mechanisms intended to induce investment. The result of a complicit government and poor operational practices can be environmental devastation and widespread human rights violations for which there is little redress. This paper analyzes the challenges inherent in using private dispute resolution mechanisms to hold corporations accountable for regulatory violations through the lens of Texaco’s 30-year operations in the Ecuadorian Amazon and the Aguinda v Chevron litigations in New York and subsequently Ecuador. The case represents the one of the most significant …

Why Harlan Fiske Stone (Also) Matters, Eric H. Schepard

Eric H Schepard

Harlan Fiske Stone has been largely overlooked in the recent legal literature even though his legacy should influence how we resolve contemporary legal problems. This article examines Stone’s archived correspondence, his speeches and opinions, and numerous secondary sources to demonstrate why he is more important now than at any time since his death in 1946. As Attorney General from 1924-25, Stone’s decision to prohibit the Bureau of Investigation (BI, today’s FBI) from spying on domestic radicals established a framework that should guide the troublesome relationship between domestic intelligence and law enforcement that reemerged after September 11, 2001. As an Associate …

Why Harlan Fiske Stone (Also) Matters, Eric H. Schepard

Eric H Schepard

Harlan Fiske Stone has been largely overlooked in the recent legal literature even though his legacy should influence how we resolve contemporary legal problems. This article examines Stone’s archived correspondence, his speeches and opinions, and numerous secondary sources to demonstrate why he is more important now than at any time since his death in 1946. As Attorney General from 1924-25, Stone’s decision to prohibit the Bureau of Investigation (BI, today’s FBI) from spying on domestic radicals established a framework that should guide the troublesome relationship between domestic intelligence and law enforcement that reemerged after September 11, 2001. As an Associate …

Why Harlan Fiske Stone (Also) Matters, Eric H. Schepard

Eric H Schepard

Harlan Fiske Stone has been largely overlooked in the recent legal literature even though his legacy should influence how we resolve contemporary legal problems. This article examines Stone’s archived correspondence, his speeches and opinions, and numerous secondary sources to demonstrate why he is more important now than at any time since his death in 1946. As Attorney General from 1924-25, Stone’s decision to prohibit the Bureau of Investigation (BI, today’s FBI) from spying on domestic radicals established a framework that should guide the troublesome relationship between domestic intelligence and law enforcement that reemerged after September 11, 2001. As an Associate …

Interpreting An Incorporative Statute: The Role Of Foreign Authority In U.S. Asylum Adjudication, Fatma E. Marouf

Fatma E Marouf

U.S. asylum law is based on a domestic statue that incorporates an international treaty, the U.N. Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees. While Supreme Court cases indicate that the rules of treaty interpretation apply to an incorporative statute, courts analyzing the statutory asylum provisions fail to give weight to the interpretations of our sister signatories, which is one of the distinctive and uncontroversial principles of treaty interpretation. The Article highlights this significant omission and urges courts to examine the interpretations of other states parties to the Protocol in asylum cases. Using as an example the current debate over social …

Why Harlan Fiske Stone (Also) Matters, Eric H. Schepard

Eric H Schepard

Harlan Fiske Stone has been largely overlooked in the recent legal literature even though his legacy should influence how we resolve contemporary legal problems. This article examines Stone’s archived correspondence, his speeches and opinions, and numerous secondary sources to demonstrate why he is more important now than at any time since his death in 1946. As Attorney General from 1924-25, Stone’s decision to prohibit the Bureau of Investigation (BI, today’s FBI) from spying on domestic radicals established a framework that should guide the troublesome relationship between domestic intelligence and law enforcement that reemerged after September 11, 2001. As an Associate …