Law Commons^™

Preserving The Ark Of Our Safety: How A Stronger Administrative Approach Could Save Section 5 Of The Voting Rights Act, Aaron Moore

Aaron M Moore

No abstract provided.

The Ftc’S Proposal For Regulating Ip Through Ssos Would Replace Private Coordination With Government Hold-Up, F. Scott Kieff, Richard Epstein, Daniel Spulber

F. Scott Kieff

In its recent report entitled “The Evolving IP Marketplace,” the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) advances a far-reaching regulatory approach (Proposal) whose likely effect would be to distort the operation of the intellectual property (IP) marketplace in ways that will hamper the innovation and commercialization of new technologies. The gist of the FTC Proposal is to rely on highly non-standard and misguided definitions of economic terms of art such as “ex ante” and “hold-up,” while urging new inefficient rules for calculating damages for patent infringement. Stripped of the technicalities, the FTC Proposal would so reduce the costs of infringement by downstream …

Leveling The Deference Playing Field, Kathryn E. Kovacs

Kathryn E. Kovacs

Judicial deference to federal agency expertise is appropriate. What is not appropriate is the judicial tendency to give the military more deference than other agencies not only in cases that directly implicate military expertise, but also in administrative law cases raising constitutional, environmental, and employment issues. This article argues that the military should receive no greater deference than other agencies under the Administrative Procedure Act. The APA established a single standard of judicial review for all agencies. Recent empirical studies have confirmed, however, what the case law has long revealed: that courts often apply different standards of review to different …

Leveling The Deference Playing Field, Kathryn E. Kovacs

Kathryn E. Kovacs

Judicial deference to federal agency expertise is appropriate. What is not appropriate is the judicial tendency to give the military more deference than other agencies not only in cases that directly implicate military expertise, but also in administrative law cases raising constitutional, environmental, and employment issues. This article argues that the military should receive no greater deference than other agencies under the Administrative Procedure Act. The APA established a single standard of judicial review for all agencies. Recent empirical studies have confirmed, however, what the case law has long revealed: that courts often apply different standards of review to different …

The Evolution Of Regulation: 20th Century Lessons And 21st Century Opportunities, John W. Mayo

John W Mayo

Abstract: Reflections on the evolution of regulatory policies over the past half-century afford the ability to not only identify important drivers to this evolution, but also to identify elements of regulation and deregulation that have been most successful in practice. The common element of these successes has been that they are "results-based." Based on these successes, this paper develops a model of "results-based regulation" through the identification of a set of principles that can used to guide 21st century regulatory practice. A consideration of regulation in the modern telecommunications industry serves as a proof of concept for the model of …

Come A Little Closer So That I Can See You My Pretty: The Use And Limits Of Fiction Point Of View Techniques In Appellate Briefs, Cathren Page

Cathren Page

Come a Little Closer so That I Can See You my Pretty, The Use and Limits of Fiction Point of Techniques in Appellate Briefs began when I was struggling to explain point of view to my students in Appellate Advocacy. They represented a fictional criminal defendant whose bag was searched when the police were executing a premises warrant at his friend’s house. My students scrunched up their faces when I tried to explain why they should not start their facts with the friend’s crime that spurred the search. The crime happened first in time, so to them it came first. …

In Defense Of The Shuckers: Enhanced Consumer Warnings And Assumption Of The Risk, Not Forced Post-Harvest Processing, As The Proper Remedy For Raw Oyster Toxicity, Scott T. Schmidt

Scott Schmidt

Oysters are a popular culinary delight. Oyster connoisseurs ("ostreaphiles") thoroughly enjoy consuming the bivalves in a multitude of ways, including fried, baked, and raw. A large portion of oysters in the U.S. come from the Gulf of Mexico. However, the FDA has proposed regulations which would make it difficult to consume living raw oysters from the Gulf of Mexico during certain times of the year. The Vibrio family of bacteria is the leading cause of raw shellfish toxicity. It occurs naturally in seawater, and is more heavily concentrated in warmer months. It is known to cause several illnesses and death …

Dr. King’S Speech: Surveying The Landscape Of Law And Justice In The Speeches, Sermons, And Writings Of Dr. Martin Luther King Junior, Carlton Waterhouse

Carlton Waterhouse

ABSTRACT The belief that an essential relationship exists between law and justice has been recognized since the time of the ancient Greeks. In fact, the concept extends well beyond Western philosophy and jurisprudence. Distinct from other aspects of justice, the relationship between law and justice considers the nature of law and its dictates as well as the responsibility of citizens to obey it. Although Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. lacked the developed legal analysis of jurisprudence scholars, he made a meaningful contribution to the intellectual discourse of his time by forcing the discussion on the broader society and centering it …

“No Fishing Poles Allowed At The Office,” And Other Suggestions On How To Limit “Fishing Expeditions” To An Outdoor Weekend Activity And Away From The Realm Of E-Discovery, Joanna K. Slusarz

Joanna Slusarz

Early settlement is usually encouraged by the courts and welcomed by most parties involved in a lawsuit. However, it may not always be the most favorable result. This idiosyncrasy arises most when the costs of continuing litigation and adjudication on the merits outweigh those of early settlement. On the other hand, early settlement raises the risk of “encourag[ing] additional, low merit cases that might not otherwise have been filed had the company chosen to litigate existing lawsuits.”

The phenomenon of electronic discovery (“e-discovery”) has exponentially increased the occurrence of the latter result. As a result, defendants, particularly large corporations with …

Heads I Win, Tails You Lose: Reconciling Brown V. Gardner's Presumption That Interpretive Doubt Be Resovled In Veterans' Favor With Chevron's Second Step, Linda D. Jellum

Linda D. Jellum

In its landmark decision, Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 467 U.S. 837 (1984), the United States Supreme Court altered the interpretive power balance. Prior to Chevron, courts determined the meaning of ambiguous regulatory statutes; after Chevron, agencies determined the meaning of ambiguous regulatory statutes. Yet this simple truism does not hold within veterans law. Within veterans law, there is a third player who plays an interpretive role: the veteran. The veteran plays an interpretive role because of an unusual presumption identified in Brown v. Gardner, 513 U.S. 115 (1994). In Gardner, the Supreme Court directed courts …

The Evolution Of Regulation: 20th Century Lessons And 21st Century Opportunities, John W. Mayo

John W Mayo

Abstract: Reflections on the evolution of regulatory policies over the past half-century afford the ability to not only identify important drivers to this evolution, but also to identify elements of regulation and deregulation that have been most successful in practice. The common element of these successes has been that they are "results-based." Based on these successes, this paper develops a model of "results-based regulation" through the identification of a set of principles that can used to guide 21st century regulatory practice. A consideration of regulation in the modern telecommunications industry serves as a proof of concept for the model of …

Philadelphia Lawyers: Policing The Law In Pennsylvania, Brian K. Pinaire, Milton Heumann, Christian Scarlett

Brian K. Pinaire

Unlike other professions within the Commonwealth, Pennsylvania attorneys “police” themselves, meaning that ethical infractions and ramifications of criminal convictions are addressed not by the government, but rather by disciplinary entities within the profession. Recent socio-legal and social science research has addressed the various statutory “collateral consequences” that attach to criminal convictions, but we know comparatively little about consequential discipline instituted outside the purview of the state. Based on an examination of 419 disciplinary dispositions from 2005-2009, as well as interviews with elites, this study provides the first-ever examination of the process and legal-political implications of peer-policing of the law in …

Remaking The World To Save It: Applying U.S. Environmental Laws To Climate Engineering Projects, Tracy Hester

Tracy Hester

Given the high levels of greenhouse gases already in the atmosphere and the likelihood of growing emissions in the future, even aggressive limits on greenhouse gas emissions might ultimately fail to prevent dangerous climate disruptions. To prepare for this risk, some scientists have started to explore techniques that directly influence or control global and regional climatic systems to offset climate change effects. As climate engineering research expands, U.S. environmental law could become an important forum for efforts to control nascent climate engineering technologies. Federal and state agencies should start now to map out regulatory strategies and guidance for potential requests …

The Clean Water Act’S Final Frontier: Taking On Nonpoint Source Pollution Using Mandatory Tmdl Rules, Jason M. Stoffel

Jason M Stoffel

While the Clean Water Act, as it is currently structured, has few provisions that directly regulate nonpoint source pollution, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, in the case Friends of Pinto Creek v. United States EPA, 504 F.3d 1007 (9th Cir. 2007), has recognized the Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) program as a tool that can be used by the EPA to indirectly compel states to regulate nonpoint source pollution in the nation’s impaired waters. In the context of the Ninth Circuit’s ruling, in 2010, the EPA made national headlines by pushing states to regulate nonpoint source pollution in the …

Reconsidering The Separation Of Banking And Commerce, Mehrsa Baradaran

Mehrsa Baradaran

This Article examines the long-held belief that banking and commerce need to be kept separate in order to ensure a stable banking system. Specifically, the Article criticizes the Bank Holding Company Act (BHCA), which prohibits non-banking entities from owning banks. The recent banking collapse has caused and exacerbated several problematic trends in U.S. banking, especially the conglomeration of banking entities and the homogenization of assets. The inflexible and outdated provisions of the BHCA are a major cause of this movement toward conglomeration and homogenization. Since the enactment of the BHCA, the landscape of U.S. banking has changed dramatically. The strict …

Critical Habitat And The Challenge Of Regulating Small Harms, David R. Owen

David R Owen

This Article investigates how the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, the National Marine Fisheries Service, and the courts are implementing the Endangered Species Act’s prohibition on “adverse modification” of “critical habitat.” That prohibition appears to be one of environmental law’s most ambitious mandates, but its actual meaning and effect are contested. Using a database of over 4,000 “biological opinions,” interviews with agency staff, and a review of judicial decisions considering the adverse modification prohibition, the Article assesses the extent to which the Fish and Wildlife Service, the National Marine Fisheries Service, and the courts are relying on the adverse …

The People's Trade Secrets?, David S. Levine

David S Levine

The content of administered public school exams, modifications made by a government to its voting machines, and the business strategies of government corporations should be of interest to the public. At a minimum, they are the kinds of information that a government should allow its citizens to see and examine. After all, the public might have some legitimate questions for its government: Is that voting machine working so that my vote gets counted? Is that public school examination fair and accurate? To whom or what is that government agency marketing and are kickbacks involved? One would think that the government …

Credit Ratings In Insurance Regulation: The Missing Piece Of Financial Reform, John P. Hunt

John P Hunt

Many commentators, including the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission, have identified the poor quality of credit ratings as an important cause of the recent financial crisis. The leading agencies all have acknowledged poor performance in some areas. One popular explanation for agencies’ poor performance is the incorporation of ratings into regulations. Rating-dependent regulation arguably reduces agencies’ incentives to do a good job (by creating artificial demand for ratings) and amplifies the negative effects of their doing a bad job (by creating regulatory consequences for rating downgrades).

Last year’s Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act apparently embraced this explanation wholeheartedly: …

A Disappointing Child Of Estranged Parents: The Failure Of New York’S School Suspension Procedure To Fulfill The Promise Of Goss V. Lopez And The City’S 1969 Education Reforms, Charles Gussow

Charles Gussow

Formal suspension hearings were promoted by school reformers in the 1970s as a method of reducing both the overall number of suspensions and the disparate impact of the punishment on minority children. However, in the four decades since suspension hearings were introduced in the United States, suspension numbers have increased and continue to fall disproportionally on black and Latino students. This article explores the history and current practice of New York City’s Department of Education as a case study for why procedural protections against suspensions have failed to meaningfully affect school discipline policy. I conclude by offering recommendations for a …

Spirited Away: Constitutional Revolutions Countered By The Non-Delegation Doctrine, Matthew A. Gripp Esq.

Matthew A Gripp Esq.

This paper will argue that the Supreme Court should awaken the non-delegation doctrine. Succinctly, the non-delegation doctrine states that congress may not delegate it’s legislative power to administrative agencies.1 The traditional “intelligible principle” test has been the guiding light in separation of powers analysis but in the history of the court it has found the requisite intelligible principle lacking in only two Congressional statutes.2

Banking On Allowances: The Epa’S Mixed Record In Managing Emissions-Market Transitions, Nathan D. Richardson, Arthur G. Fraas

Nathan D Richardson

The history of emissions-trading markets in the United States is marked by change. Since cap-and-trade programs were first implemented on a large scale after the 1990 Amendments to the Clean Air Act, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has repeatedly revised and replaced emissionstrading markets for nitrous oxides and sulfur dioxide. In each transition, the agency has had to decide what to do with emissions allowances banked in the earlier program. These banked allowances represent early reductions in emissions, with corresponding environmental benefits, but also the expectation on the part of regulated entities that they will continue to hold value …

The Asylum Law Of The Particular Social Group, Matthew Paul Nickson

Matthew Paul Nickson

No abstract provided.

The Perils Of A Half-Built Bridge: Risk Perception, Shifting Majorities, And The Nuclear Power Debat, Amanda Leiter

Amanda Leiter

Much of the risk perception literature relies on the important but unstated assumption that manipulating public opinion to conform to scientific assessments of risk could help the public and, in turn, policymakers make better decisions about whether and how to regulate. This paper argues that the assumption fails in the context of certain “multilayered” risks, or risks that pose tiered policy choices – not just whether to regulate in the first instance, but how to respond to derivative risks arising from the first set of regulatory changes. Examining the debate about the role of nuclear power in the United States’ …

The Brand X Constitution, Richard W. Murphy

Richard W. Murphy

In recent years, the Supreme Court’s claim to be the final, definitive interpreter of the Constitution has come under sustained attack from across the political spectrum from scholars pushing for a more “popular” constitutionalism. This Article contributes to “popular constitutionalism” by deploying recent developments in the Supreme Court’s own administrative-law doctrine against it. Together, these Chevron-related developments form the Brand X model, which stands broadly for the proposition that, where an agency uses transparent, deliberative means to adopt a reasonable interpretation of a statute it administers, the courts should defer to this interpretation regardless of whether it contradicts judicial precedent. …

Breaking Free Of Chevron’S Constraints: Zuni Public School District 89, Et Al. V. U.S. Department Of Education, Osamudia R. James

Osamudia R. James

Breaking Free of Chevron’s Constraints: Zuni Public School District 89, et al. v. U.S. Department of Education, analyzes the Supreme Court’s latest review of an administrative interpretation under Chevron review, and concludes that the doctrine’s exclusive focus on deciding “who gets to decide” led to a complete failure by the Court to consider the consequences of the agency interpretation at issue. Such a failure renders the Court unprepared to accurately determine whether the agency interpretation is “permissible” under the second prong of Chevron review. As a solution, the article advocates for the replacement of Chevron’s second prong with the more …

The Fair Track To Expanded Free Trade: Making Taa Benefits More Accessible To American Workers, William J. Mateikis

William J. Mateikis

If Congress again wants to use the TAA program in a bargain for Fast Track authority … then DOL must fix its broken certification process and Congress should amend the TAA Act to reduce worker resistance to expanded free trade. The topic is quite timely given the expiration of fast track (trade promotion) authority on June 30, 2007 and reauthorization of the TAA program due October 1, 2007. The paper has five parts. Following the Introduction, Part II of the paper outlines the politics of U.S. trade liberalization since the mid-1930s and shows that, at times over the past three …

Unofficial Official Comments, Nigel Stark

Nigel Stark

My Note examines Justice Antonin Scalia’s “plain meaning” theory and asks whether, assuming that theory is correct, whether official comments should be used to interpret a statute. Specifically, I examine the use of the UCC’s Official Comments and its various state variations. I conclude that, under Justice Scalia’s theory, the use of official comments is to interpret the statute is improper and should be avoided.

New Governance, Compliance, And Principles-Based Securities Regulation, Cristie L. Ford

Cristie L. Ford

The UK securities regulator, the Financial Services Authority, claims that its "principles-based" approach to securities regulation is simply "better" than what it characterizes as the prescriptive, rules-based American approach. The striking shift in financial sector business from New York to London over the last two years has brought the question of the wisdom of principles-based regulation into sharp relief. In fact, an FSA-style regulatory approach may also be taking hold in Canada, through the agency of the province of British Columbia. This paper examines BC's innovative proposals for a principles-based securities regime through the lens of New Governance theory. I …

Reinterpreting The Role Of Special Trial Judges Through Standards Of Review, Christopher M. Pietruszkiewicz

Christopher M. Pietruszkiewicz

Standards of review define the scope of power between judicial actors by dictating the level of discretion given to an original trier of fact. In the articulation of a standard of review, language is an insufficient source for defining a standard because of the inability of specific terminology to produce objective certainty. It is because words are not susceptible to objective certainty that the language used in defining a standard of review could be considered irrelevant and indistinguishable.

While the words may be indistinguishable, it is the uniformity of terms that promotes consistency in application. It may be impossible to …