Law Commons^™

Civil Recourse, Damages-As-Redress, And Constitutional Torts, Michael L. Wells

Georgia Law Review

Modern tort theory is dominated by the principle of loss
allocation, which uses liability and damages as
instruments for assigning losses to deter unwanted
behavior and to compensate the plaintiff. Under loss
allocation, the central principle of damages is to make the
plaintiff whole through 'full" compensation. Recently, as
an alternative to loss allocation,Professors John Goldberg
and Benjamin Zipursky have advanced a civil recourse
theory of damages. In contrast to loss allocation, civil
recourse focuses tort law on empowering plaintiffs to seek
redress by evaluating damages through the lens of 'fair"
compensation. Goldberg and Zipursky's work is especially
timely because, …

The Obligatory Structure Of Copyright Law: Unbundling The Wrong Of Copying, Shyamkrishna Balganesh

All Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Learning From The Master: Things Betty Thompson Taught Me, David Spratt

Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals

No abstract provided.

Preparatory Negligence, Robert H. Heidt

Articles by Maurer Faculty

This Essay discusses the appropriate significance in tort law of a negligent attempt to perform an injurious activity when the evidence is insufficient to show the actual performance of the activity was negligent. The author calls such a negligent attempt uncoupled with sufficient evidence of negligent performance "preparatory negligence." An example would be driving a car when one is so inebriated that the decision to drive is negligent but those injured in a subsequent accident are unable to show the inebriated driver's actual driving was negligent. The author argues that preparatory negligence alone should never warrant tort liability. Rather, those …

A Tale Of Two Ironies: In Defense Of Tort, David Partlett, William Gill

William Gill

New York's Law Of Tax Malpractice Damages: Balanced Or Biased?, Jacob L. Todres

Jacob L. Todres

In this article Professor Todres focuses on two common elements of damages often incurred by plaintiffs who are the victims of negligently rendered incorrect tax advice—additional, avoidable taxes, and interest on underpaid taxes. Both of these types of damages appear not to be recoverable under current New York law that traces its roots to Alpert v. Shea Gould Climenko and Casey, 160 A.D.2d 67, 559 N.Y.S.2d 312 (1st Dept. 1990).

As to the non-recovery of additional taxes that could have been avoided with correct advice, Professor Todres argues that current New York law is incorrect. It is based upon Alpert, …

The Hedonic Impact Of Stand-Alone Emotional Harms: An Analysis Of Survey Data, David E. Depianto

David E. DePianto

This paper employs survey data on subjective well-being and a battery of self-assessed health measures to estimate the hedonic impact of emotional health, as decoupled from its physical counterpart. The disaggregation of global health into physical and emotional components is done with a parochial eye toward tort law, which has historically drawn a distinction between physical and emotional harms, limiting recovery on the latter — particularly “stand-alone” emotional harms —through various common law doctrines. The results of three sets of regression analyses suggest that a range of potentially inactionable emotional conditions, including emotional conditions with no concomitant physical manifestations, exert …

Workplace Health And Safety Law In Australia Update No 1, Neil J. Foster

Neil J Foster

This is one of a series of updates I will be issuing to provide notes of recent developments in Workplace Health and Safety Law which either have occurred after the book was published, or which I hadn't noticed previously. Update No 1 deals with changes to the common law in relation to actions for nervous shock by relatives of workers who are killed or injured by their employer's negligence.

Review Of "Liability For Wrongful Interferences With Chattels" By Simon Douglas (2011), Neil J. Foster

Neil J Foster

A review of a recent monograph dealing with the way the common law protects property rights in personal property.

The “Ensuing Loss” Clause In Insurance Policies: The Forgotten And Misunderstood Antidote To Anti-Concurrent Causation Exclusions, Chris French

Christopher C. French

As a result of the 1906 earthquake and fire in San Francisco which destroyed the city, a clause known as the “ensuing loss” clause was created to address concurrent causation situations in which a loss follows both a covered peril and an excluded peril. Ensuing loss clauses appear in the exclusions section of such policies and in essence they provide that coverage for a loss caused by an excluded peril is nonetheless covered if the loss “ensues” from a covered peril. Today, ensuing loss clauses are found in “all risk” property and homeowners policies, which cover all losses except for …

The “Non-Cumulation Clause”: An “Other Insurance” Clause By Another Name, Chris French

Christopher C. French

How long-tail liability claims such as asbestos bodily injury claims and environmental property damage claims are allocated among multiple triggered policy years can result in the shifting of tens or hundreds of millions of dollars from one party to another. In recent years, insurers have argued that clauses commonly titled, “Prior Insurance and Non-Cumulation of Liability” (referred to herein as “Non-Cumulation Clauses”), which are found in commercial liability policies, should be applied to reduce or eliminate their coverage responsibilities for long-tail liability claims by shifting their coverage responsibilities to insurers that issued policies in earlier policy years. The insurers’ argument …

Debunking The Myth That Insurance Coverage Is Not Available Or Allowed For Intentional Torts Or Damages, Christopher French

Christopher C. French