Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Taxation-Federal

University of Washington School of Law

Internal Revenue Code

Articles 1 - 3 of 3

Full-Text Articles in Law

Taxing Parents: Welfarist Theories, Shannon Weeks Mccormack Jan 2021

Taxing Parents: Welfarist Theories, Shannon Weeks Mccormack

Articles

The Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”) taxes parents inequitably. Couples with a sole earner are under-taxed compared to couples with dual earners or single parents. Previous scholarship has identified these inequities and then argued that this sole earner bias should be eliminated. These arguments, however, have often been incomplete. Simply establishing that an inequity exists does not create a full argument for legal reform. After all, the Code plays favorites all the time. Scholars have traditionally turned to theories of distributive justice when evaluating whether tax preferences are warranted. These theories offer competing visions about the way resources should be …


Caregivers And Tax Reform: Before And After Snapshots, Shannon Weeks Mccormack Jan 2020

Caregivers And Tax Reform: Before And After Snapshots, Shannon Weeks Mccormack

Articles

The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) changed the way families are taxed, starting in tax year 2018. By rearranging a myriad of deck chairs, politicians painted rosy pictures of families reaping the benefits of tax reform. In reality, however, generalizations cannot be made and the extent to which any one family gains or loses depends on particular facts. Even more obscured is the way in which the TCJA changed –– and failed to change –– the taxation of different types of caregivers. This Essay seeks to provide needed clarity in this area. It begins by offering snapshots of how …


Section 367: An Enigma, Julie W. Weston Mar 1970

Section 367: An Enigma, Julie W. Weston

Washington Law Review

Section 367 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 was enacted in its original form in 1932 in order to close what Congress considered to be a serious tax loophole available to domestic corporations and individuals carrying on business through the use of foreign corporations or contemplating the use of foreign corporations to realize large gains without paying taxes. The loophole resulted from the operation of the nonrecognition provisions of the Code dealing with the organization and reorganization of corporations. By using these provisions, individuals and corporations—both foreign and domestic—could transfer greatly appreciated property and unrealized profits on a tax-free …