Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Supreme Court of the United States
University of Cincinnati College of Law
- Keyword
-
- Supreme Court (11)
- Standing (9)
- Discrimination (8)
- Article III (7)
- Title VII (6)
-
- ADEA (5)
- Age Discrimination in Employment Act (5)
- Americans with Disabilities Act (5)
- Civil Rights Act (5)
- Court of Appeals (5)
- Tort (5)
- United States (5)
- ADA (4)
- Criminal (4)
- Employment law (4)
- NAPD (4)
- National Association for Public Defense (4)
- Defendants (3)
- Defense (3)
- Federal law (3)
- Indigent (3)
- Public defender (3)
- Capital (2)
- Civil rights (2)
- Congress (2)
- Counsel (2)
- Death penalty (2)
- Eleventh Circuit (2)
- Employment discrimination (2)
- Environmental law (2)
Articles 31 - 32 of 32
Full-Text Articles in Law
Mental Health Courts And Title Ii Of The Ada: Accessibility To State Court Systems For Individuals With Mental Disabilities And The Need For Diversion, S. Elizabeth Malloy
Mental Health Courts And Title Ii Of The Ada: Accessibility To State Court Systems For Individuals With Mental Disabilities And The Need For Diversion, S. Elizabeth Malloy
Faculty Articles and Other Publications
Access to the judicial system, a fundamental right that has paramount importance in our society, can often present obstacles to people with disabilities in a variety of significant ways. Yet Title II mandates that state and local judicial facilities be accessible to individuals with disabilities. Recent shifts in paradigmatic approaches to special populations such as drug offenders and offenders with mental disabilities have lead to the creation of mental health courts specifically designed to address the needs of the persons with mental disabilities in order to avoid incarceration. Early outcomes in states like Ohio suggest mental health courts may better …
Attorney-Client Privilege When The Client Is A Public Official: Litigating The Opening Act Of The Impeachment Drama, Timothy K. Armstrong
Attorney-Client Privilege When The Client Is A Public Official: Litigating The Opening Act Of The Impeachment Drama, Timothy K. Armstrong
Faculty Articles and Other Publications
The divided panel decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit in /n re Lindsey, 158 F.3d 1263 (D.C. Cir.), cert. denied, 119 S. Ct. 466 (1998), represented a dramatic shift in that court's thinking on the question whether the attorney-client privilege protects what a government official says to his agency's counsel in confidence. Although the court of appeals in at least four previous decisions had held that a government agency client holds the same privilege any other client would under like circumstances to communicate with counsel in private, the Lindsey court took a quite different view.