Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- St. Mary's University (21)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (10)
- Pepperdine University (5)
- Seattle University School of Law (4)
- University of Arkansas, Fayetteville (4)
-
- Brooklyn Law School (3)
- Cleveland State University (2)
- University of Baltimore Law (2)
- University of Michigan Law School (2)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (2)
- Florida State University College of Law (1)
- Fordham Law School (1)
- Georgia State University College of Law (1)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (1)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (1)
- St. John's University School of Law (1)
- The University of Akron (1)
- University of Oklahoma College of Law (1)
- University of San Diego (1)
- University of Washington School of Law (1)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (1)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- St. Mary's Law Journal (18)
- Touro Law Review (10)
- Pepperdine Law Review (5)
- Seattle University Law Review (4)
- Arkansas Law Review (3)
-
- Cleveland State Law Review (2)
- Journal of Law and Policy (2)
- Nevada Law Journal (2)
- St. Mary's Journal on Legal Malpractice & Ethics (2)
- University of Baltimore Law Forum (2)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (2)
- Akron Law Review (1)
- Brooklyn Law Review (1)
- Florida State University Law Review (1)
- Fordham Urban Law Journal (1)
- Georgia State University Law Review (1)
- Indiana Law Journal (1)
- Journal of Food Law & Policy (1)
- Northwestern University Law Review (1)
- Oklahoma Law Review (1)
- San Diego Law Review (1)
- St. John's Law Review (1)
- The Scholar: St. Mary's Law Review on Race and Social Justice (1)
- Vanderbilt Law Review (1)
- Washington Journal of Social & Environmental Justice (1)
Articles 61 - 66 of 66
Full-Text Articles in Law
Shouting Incitement In The Courtroom: An Evolving Theory Of Civil Liability Comment., Michael P. Kopech
Shouting Incitement In The Courtroom: An Evolving Theory Of Civil Liability Comment., Michael P. Kopech
St. Mary's Law Journal
Civil incitement is an evolving theory, intended to ascribe liability to a publisher. Civil incitement charges that the contents of a publication proximately caused the plaintiff’s physical injury, thus holding publishers civilly liable for the physical consequences of their communications. However, the validity of civil incitement as an actionable tort clashes with the principles of freedom of speech and press embodied within the First Amendment. Incitement, as a successful cause of action, demands following the standards set out in Brandenburg v. Ohio. Prior attempts to hold publishers civilly liable for the physical consequences of their communications have rarely survived motions …
The Right To Speak, Write, And Publish Freely: State Constitutional Protection Against Private Abridgment, Justice Robert F. Utter
The Right To Speak, Write, And Publish Freely: State Constitutional Protection Against Private Abridgment, Justice Robert F. Utter
Seattle University Law Review
This Article presents an independent analysis of a fundamental aspect of the free speech provision of the Washington Declaration of Rights, which closely resembles the free speech provisions of many other state constitutions. The focus is on whether the Washington free speech provision protects Washingtonians against abridgment of their speech and press rights by private individuals and organizations. To answer this question, this Article examines the nature of state constitutions and government, the case law of other jurisdictions interpreting similar provisions, the text of the Washington provision, the origins of the provision, the historical background of the Washington Constitutional Convention, …
An At-Will Employee May Be Fired Despite Motives Which Violate State Public Policy., Kelsey Menzel
An At-Will Employee May Be Fired Despite Motives Which Violate State Public Policy., Kelsey Menzel
St. Mary's Law Journal
Scholars generally agree children possess fewer rights than adults under the Constitution. Moreover, the school, as a restricted environment, places additional constraints on the constitutional rights of minors. In recent years, however, the Supreme Court extended to minor students the rights of equal protection and civil due process. In Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District, the Court acknowledged children have First Amendment rights of self-expression in a school environment. This marked a significant change from the judiciary’s traditional reluctance to interfere in school matters. Subsequent First Amendment challenges to school board decisions have focused on library book removal. …
Spears V. State, 337 So. 2d 977 (Fla. 1976), John Mueller
Spears V. State, 337 So. 2d 977 (Fla. 1976), John Mueller
Florida State University Law Review
Constitutional Law- SPEECH- FLORIDA'S INDECENT AND OBSCENE LANGUAGE STATUTE DECLARED UNCONSTITUTIONAL ON ITS FACE FOR OVERBREADTH.
Note: Using Constitutional Zoning To Neutralize Adult Entertainment - Detroit To New York, Charles T. Fee, Jr.
Note: Using Constitutional Zoning To Neutralize Adult Entertainment - Detroit To New York, Charles T. Fee, Jr.
Fordham Urban Law Journal
In an effort to prevent the spread of businesses specializing in adult entertainment, many cities have utilized zoning ordinances to combat problems in certain neighborhoods. New York City, Boston, and Detroit all have instituted such restrictions. This Note will consider whether the zoning of businesses specializing in adult entertainment is a legitimate exercise of the state's police power, analyzing its potential as a violation of the first amendment and the equal protection clause of the fourteenth amendment. In addition, the Note will examine the validity of using the twenty-first amendment to regulate adult entertainment businesses that serve alcoholic beverages.
State Constitutions, State Courts And First Amendment Freedoms, Monrad G. Paulsen
State Constitutions, State Courts And First Amendment Freedoms, Monrad G. Paulsen
Vanderbilt Law Review
We have recently been reminded that one of the current and recurrent quandaries of the Supreme Court of the United States arises from the American constitutional system's counterpart of the philosophical problem of the One and the Many. When an individual's freedom is involved, the question is whether and to what degree state legislators, public officials and judicial officers shall be called upon to enforce standards of respect for personal liberties defined by the Federal Constitution and the United States Supreme Court; or, put another way, how far the first eight amendments of the Federal Constitution are incorporated into the …