Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- University of Richmond (39)
- St. Mary's University (22)
- UIC School of Law (16)
- University of Michigan Law School (12)
- University of the District of Columbia School of Law (9)
-
- Brigham Young University Law School (5)
- University of Denver (3)
- University of Kentucky (3)
- University of Oklahoma College of Law (3)
- American University Washington College of Law (2)
- Cleveland State University (2)
- Loyola University Chicago, School of Law (2)
- University of Colorado Law School (2)
- William & Mary Law School (2)
- Campbell University School of Law (1)
- Florida State University College of Law (1)
- Seattle University School of Law (1)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (1)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (1)
- Keyword
-
- St. Mary’s Law Journal (12)
- St. Mary’s University School of Law (12)
- Inc. (5)
- Criminal law (4)
- American Political Science Association (APSA) (3)
-
- Congress (3)
- D.C. Courts (3)
- District of Columbia Democracy (3)
- Federalism (3)
- Judges (3)
- LGBT (3)
- New Orleans (3)
- Right to die (3)
- Symposium (3)
- Washington v. Glucksberg (3)
- Commonwealth (2)
- Cooperative federalism (2)
- Courts (2)
- Death with Dignity Act (2)
- Democracy (2)
- Discrimination (2)
- Due process (2)
- Elections (2)
- End of life (2)
- Equal Protection Clause (2)
- Gonzales v. Carhart (2)
- Home Rule (2)
- Immigration (2)
- Jr. (2)
- Judicial Appointments (2)
- Publication
-
- St. Mary's Law Journal (22)
- UIC Law Review (16)
- Richmond Journal of Law and the Public Interest (14)
- Richmond Public Interest Law Review (14)
- University of Richmond Law Review (11)
-
- University of the District of Columbia Law Review (9)
- Michigan Law Review (6)
- BYU Law Review (5)
- Human Rights & Human Welfare (3)
- Kentucky Law Journal (3)
- Michigan Journal of Race and Law (3)
- American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law (2)
- Oklahoma Law Review (2)
- Public Interest Law Reporter (2)
- University of Colorado Law Review (2)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (2)
- William & Mary Environmental Law and Policy Review (2)
- American Indian Law Review (1)
- Campbell Law Review (1)
- Cleveland State Law Review (1)
- Florida State University Journal of Transnational Law & Policy (1)
- Journal of Law and Health (1)
- Journal of Race, Gender, and Ethnicity (1)
- Michigan Law Review First Impressions (1)
- Seattle University Law Review (1)
- Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law (1)
Articles 61 - 90 of 127
Full-Text Articles in Law
The Clean Water Act's Antidegradation Policy: Has It Been "Dumped"?, 42 J. Marshall L. Rev. 209 (2008), Katherine A. Zogas
The Clean Water Act's Antidegradation Policy: Has It Been "Dumped"?, 42 J. Marshall L. Rev. 209 (2008), Katherine A. Zogas
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Foreword, 41 J. Marshall L. Rev. Xxvii (2008), Nancee Alexa Barth
Foreword, 41 J. Marshall L. Rev. Xxvii (2008), Nancee Alexa Barth
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Reforming The Illinois Criminal Code: Where The Clear Commission Stopped Short Of Its Goals, 41 J. Marshall L. Rev. 741 (2008), Terri L. Mascherin, Andrew Vail, Jennifer L. Dlugosz
Reforming The Illinois Criminal Code: Where The Clear Commission Stopped Short Of Its Goals, 41 J. Marshall L. Rev. 741 (2008), Terri L. Mascherin, Andrew Vail, Jennifer L. Dlugosz
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
"I'D Grab At Anything. And I'D Forget." Domestic Violence Victim Testimony After Davis V. Washington, 41 J. Marshall L. Rev. 937 (2008), Nancee Alexa Barth
"I'D Grab At Anything. And I'D Forget." Domestic Violence Victim Testimony After Davis V. Washington, 41 J. Marshall L. Rev. 937 (2008), Nancee Alexa Barth
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
An Analysis Of The Contraction Of Limited Tort Immunity For Recreational Liability In Illinois, 42 J. Marshall L. Rev. 65 (2008), Barnett P. Ruttenberg, Thomas Gianturco
An Analysis Of The Contraction Of Limited Tort Immunity For Recreational Liability In Illinois, 42 J. Marshall L. Rev. 65 (2008), Barnett P. Ruttenberg, Thomas Gianturco
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Rehabilitating Juvenile Sex Offenders With A Life Sentence, 42 J. Marshall L. Rev. 187 (2008), Adam Doeringer
Rehabilitating Juvenile Sex Offenders With A Life Sentence, 42 J. Marshall L. Rev. 187 (2008), Adam Doeringer
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Richard B. Lillich Memorial Lecture: New Directions In The Struggle Against Human Trafficking, Mark Sidel
Richard B. Lillich Memorial Lecture: New Directions In The Struggle Against Human Trafficking, Mark Sidel
Florida State University Journal of Transnational Law & Policy
No abstract provided.
An Open Letter To The Political Science Community, Daniel R. Pinello
An Open Letter To The Political Science Community, Daniel R. Pinello
Human Rights & Human Welfare
In 2003, the American Political Science Association (APSA) selected New Orleans as the site for its 2012 annual meeting.
In 2004, 78 percent of Louisiana voters (including 54 percent in Orleans Parish) passed the following amendment to their state constitution:
Marriage in the state of Louisiana shall consist only of the union of one man and one woman. No official or court of the state of Louisiana shall construe this constitution or any state law to require that marriage or the legal incidents thereof be conferred upon any member of a union other than the union of one man and …
Choices Matter: Human Rights, Economic Solidarity And The 2012 Apsa Meeting, Michael Goodhart
Choices Matter: Human Rights, Economic Solidarity And The 2012 Apsa Meeting, Michael Goodhart
Human Rights & Human Welfare
I believe that because Louisiana’s constitution violates the human rights of many of our colleagues, the American Political Science Association (APSA) should move its 2012 meeting from New Orleans. If it does not do so, I would urge members to boycott (the same applies to the Southern Political Science Association, which meets annually in New Orleans).
Friction By Design: The Necessary Contest Of State Judicial Power And Legislative Policymaking, Michael L. Buenger
Friction By Design: The Necessary Contest Of State Judicial Power And Legislative Policymaking, Michael L. Buenger
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
States Take The Wheel—Green Mountain Chrysler Plymntouth Dodge Jeep V. Crombie Gives States A Chance To Choose The Direction Of Their Automobile Emissions Regulation, Sarah E. Leatherwood
States Take The Wheel—Green Mountain Chrysler Plymntouth Dodge Jeep V. Crombie Gives States A Chance To Choose The Direction Of Their Automobile Emissions Regulation, Sarah E. Leatherwood
Oklahoma Law Review
No abstract provided.
Danforth, Retroactivity, And Federalism, J. Thomas Sullivan
Danforth, Retroactivity, And Federalism, J. Thomas Sullivan
Oklahoma Law Review
No abstract provided.
A Choice That Leaves No Choice: Unconstitutional Coercion Under Real Id, Michael J. Allen
A Choice That Leaves No Choice: Unconstitutional Coercion Under Real Id, Michael J. Allen
Seattle University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Harnessing The Hired Guns: The Substantive Nature Of Ohio Revised Code 2743.43 Under Article Iv, Section 5(B) Of The Ohio Constitution, Patrick Vrobel
Harnessing The Hired Guns: The Substantive Nature Of Ohio Revised Code 2743.43 Under Article Iv, Section 5(B) Of The Ohio Constitution, Patrick Vrobel
Journal of Law and Health
Under Article IV, Section 5(B), rules of procedure that impact the substantive rights of Ohio citizens are considered far too important to be encroached upon by the judiciary. Rules affecting substantive rights, therefore, have been expressly delegated to the legislature. Because rules that regulate the competency of medical experts inevitably encroach upon the ability of a tort victim to seek redress in a court of law, such rules impact substantive rights in very real and tangible ways. As a result, the medical expert statute must control. To find otherwise would permit the judiciary to encroach upon the substantive rights of …
On The Trail To Increased Client Protection: Attorney Contingent Fee Contract Termination In Light Of Hoover V. Walton Recent Development., Tiffanie S. Clausewitz
On The Trail To Increased Client Protection: Attorney Contingent Fee Contract Termination In Light Of Hoover V. Walton Recent Development., Tiffanie S. Clausewitz
St. Mary's Law Journal
Abstract Forthcoming.
A Pragmatic Look At Mediation And Collaborative Law As Alternatives To Family Law Litigation Comment., Elizabeth F. Beyer
A Pragmatic Look At Mediation And Collaborative Law As Alternatives To Family Law Litigation Comment., Elizabeth F. Beyer
St. Mary's Law Journal
Since close to half the country’s marriages end in divorce, marriage dissolution is quite a lucrative business for attorneys. Also, fewer people are entering marriage in the first place. Fewer marriages combined with more children born out of wedlock create multitudinous legal problems and family disputes centering around those children. In addition to initial divorce filings and suits affecting the parent-child relationship, dissolution of marriage cases often creates additional litigation down the road. As a solution to the problems caused by the expense and toil of this litigation, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) offers several options for family disputants. Two popular …
The Texas School Finance Litigation Saga: Great Progress, Then Near Death By A Thousand Cuts., Albert H. Kauffman
The Texas School Finance Litigation Saga: Great Progress, Then Near Death By A Thousand Cuts., Albert H. Kauffman
St. Mary's Law Journal
The Texas Legislature’s system for financing Texas schools is significantly more equitable after Edgewood v. Kirby. Edgewood I and Edgewood II effectively forced the legislature to improve the finance system. However, the rulings in the first two Edgewood cases have been whittled away by the last four Edgewood decisions.. As a result, courts now approach fundamental issues, legislative power, and the relationship between them differently. The Edgewood v. Kirby legacy still improves the equity and adequacy of Texas’s public education finance system. This legacy is expanded upon with observations regarding long term impacts of the Texas school finance litigation saga.
Ohio's Ban On Municipal Residency Requirements: Can The Employee Welfare Provisions Of The Ohio Constitution Protect The Ban From Home Rule Challenges, Brenda A. Sweet
Ohio's Ban On Municipal Residency Requirements: Can The Employee Welfare Provisions Of The Ohio Constitution Protect The Ban From Home Rule Challenges, Brenda A. Sweet
Cleveland State Law Review
This Note argues that the Ohio Revised Code prohibition of residency requirements does not qualify as legislation for the "comfort, health, safety and welfare of all employees" since the law improperly attempts to control conditions for employment, rather than conditions of employment, and that the Supreme Court of Ohio has previously, improperly interpreted the employee welfare provision and should more narrowly construe, if not reverse, its holding in Rocky River IV. Part II addresses residency requirements in the city of Cleveland and describes the current litigation in which the city is involved. Part III provides a background of the four …
Why All The King's Horses And All The King's Men Couldn't Putsovereign Immunity Back Together Again:An Analysis Of The Test Created In James V. Jane, Colleen F. Shepherd
Why All The King's Horses And All The King's Men Couldn't Putsovereign Immunity Back Together Again:An Analysis Of The Test Created In James V. Jane, Colleen F. Shepherd
Richmond Public Interest Law Review
In creating the test to determine whether government employees in the Commonwealth of Virginia are entitled to the benefit of sovereign tort immunity, the Supreme Court of Virginia stated, "[a] dmittedly, no single all-inclusive rule can be enunciated or applied in determining entitlement to sovereign immunity." The court, however, managed to formulate a four-part test to be consistently applied to each situation requiring a determination of whether sovereign immunity should be granted to a state employee. This article will examine the discretion prong of the four-part test created by the court in James v. Jane and the reasons why the …
Mental Health In Virginia, Phillip Hamilton
Mental Health In Virginia, Phillip Hamilton
Richmond Public Interest Law Review
Since the April 16, 2007 tragedy at Virginia Tech, the public's attention has focused on Virginia's mental health system. Like far too many public policy issues that face the government, it often takes a tragedy to bring an issue to the point where real action is taken. Over the years, one of the major issues facing Virginia has been how to best meet the needs of its citizens requiring mental health services. This is not a new issue. Since 1949 there have been many studies of Virginia's mental health system. These studies have emphasized the same issues over and over …
Promised Reforms Fall Short Of The Mark, Colleen Miller
Promised Reforms Fall Short Of The Mark, Colleen Miller
Richmond Public Interest Law Review
Did the General Assembly pass sweeping mental health law reforms? Do the new laws make it easier to hospitalize individuals against their will, and if so, is that a desirable end? While new legislation rewords our civil commitment statute, do the new words really improve Virginia's mental health care system? In all likelihood, the most significant effect of the new legislation will be making our mental health laws more vulnerable to constitutional challenge, while simultaneously making it more difficult for Virginians to get necessary mental health treatment voluntarily.
Illegal Immigration In The Virginia General Assembly - From The Perspective Of An Advocate Of Passing Laws To Stop Illegal Immigration: Why Do It And What Can Be Done, David B. Albo
Richmond Public Interest Law Review
An editorial discussing the following, 1. Why legislators want to pass laws to discourage illegal alien: The problem with illegal immigration isn't the people it's the cost, 2. How legislators can pass laws to discourage illegal aliens from coming to Virginia, 3. 2008 legislation on immigration
Two Thumbs Down: In The Absence Of Comprehensive Immigration Reform, Ill-Conceived Bills Flood The Virginia General Assembly, Leigh A. Sellers
Two Thumbs Down: In The Absence Of Comprehensive Immigration Reform, Ill-Conceived Bills Flood The Virginia General Assembly, Leigh A. Sellers
Richmond Public Interest Law Review
On July 26, 2007, a federal court ruled it unconstitutional for city officials in Hazleton, Pennsylvania, to implement a local anti-immigrant ordinance that punished employers and landlords for doing business with undocumented immigrants. Despite this well-grounded landmark decision, local governments throughout the nation continue to develop patchwork solutions to a broken federal immigration system, endangering the health and well-being of communities and people alike. Virginia has positioned itself at the forefront of America's immigration debate. Leading up to the 2008 General Assembly session, localities throughout the state developed public statements on immigration, reaffirmed English as the official language, and considered …
Secondhand Smoke Deserves First-Rate Attention, Rickie Fulcher
Secondhand Smoke Deserves First-Rate Attention, Rickie Fulcher
Richmond Public Interest Law Review
Most people probably do not know that as many as 65,000 nonsmokers die from secondhand smoke exposure each year. In fact, secondhand smoke is the third leading cause of preventable death in the United States. During the 2008 session of the Virginia General Assembly, state legislators commendably introduced twelve smoke-free bills -the most in the legislature's history. While many of these efforts to protect the public health succeeded in the Senate, a House of Delegates subcommittee declined to hear many of the bills, effectively removing them from further consideration. Clearly, Virginia has a long way to go, but support for …
The Price Of Privilege: Is Virginia's Ban On Mental Health Professionals' Participation In Custody Determinations Really In The Best Interests Of The Child, Mary Wilkins Hunt
The Price Of Privilege: Is Virginia's Ban On Mental Health Professionals' Participation In Custody Determinations Really In The Best Interests Of The Child, Mary Wilkins Hunt
Richmond Public Interest Law Review
This article examines the national treatment of mental health care professionals' participation in custody determinations and compares these practices with Virginia's ban. Furthermore, this article explores the rationale behind the ban on therapist testimony while weighing the pros and cons of allowing such evidence to be used. It then takes a closer look at the arguments for repealing the ban and the possible benefits which could result from the 2008 repeal.
Dui Gilt Pl8: An Evaluation Of The Proposed Shaming Sanction For Multiple Dui Offenders, Theresa M. Young
Dui Gilt Pl8: An Evaluation Of The Proposed Shaming Sanction For Multiple Dui Offenders, Theresa M. Young
Richmond Public Interest Law Review
This comment seeks to analyze House Bill 1281 in the larger social context of shaming sanctions. It begins by tracing a brief history of offender punishment from the common use of shaming mechanisms to their disappearance and gradual resurgence. It further looks to the theoretical foundations of such alternative sanctions, as well as their potential effects on both individual conduct and social norms. Finally, it looks at the relationship between other approaches to DUI convictions and the methods proposed in Virginia.
Indices
Richmond Public Interest Law Review
Index of bills from the House and Senate of the Virginia General Assembly
Chapters In The History Of The Supreme Court Of Texas: Reconstruction And Redemption (1866-1882)., Hans W. Baade
Chapters In The History Of The Supreme Court Of Texas: Reconstruction And Redemption (1866-1882)., Hans W. Baade
St. Mary's Law Journal
Abstract Forthcoming.
It's About Time: The Need For A Uniform Approach To Using A Prior Conviction To Impact A Witness., Robert F. Holland
It's About Time: The Need For A Uniform Approach To Using A Prior Conviction To Impact A Witness., Robert F. Holland
St. Mary's Law Journal
In Texas, no uniform approach exists in determining whether to admit evidence of a prior conviction as a technique to impeach a witness. This lack of uniformity leads to significant consequences for the parties and poses a potential prejudicial effect on the truthful character of a witness. Furthermore, there is currently no bright-line judicial standard when evaluating the admissibility of certain prior convictions. Although the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals in Theus v. State provided a non-exhaustive set of factors for trial judges to consider, the court has yet to clarify particular aspects of how to properly apply Texas Rule …