Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School (36)
- University of Colorado Law School (28)
- University of Massachusetts Boston (9)
- William & Mary Law School (9)
- Duke Law (7)
-
- Singapore Management University (6)
- Columbia Law School (4)
- Himmelfarb Health Sciences Library, The George Washington University (4)
- University of North Florida (4)
- University of Pittsburgh School of Law (4)
- Cleveland State University (3)
- Cornell University Law School (3)
- University at Buffalo School of Law (3)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (3)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (2)
- Montclair State University (2)
- The University of Maine (2)
- UC Law SF (2)
- University of Michigan Law School (2)
- University of Richmond (2)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (2)
- Chicago-Kent College of Law (1)
- Florida A&M University College of Law (1)
- Marshall University (1)
- Osgoode Hall Law School of York University (1)
- Pace University (1)
- The University of San Francisco (1)
- University of Baltimore Law (1)
- University of Florida Levin College of Law (1)
- University of Kentucky (1)
- Keyword
-
- Colorado (9)
- Arizona (7)
- Population growth (6)
- United States (6)
- Utah (6)
-
- Civil Rights (5)
- Economics (5)
- Endangered Species Act (5)
- New Mexico (5)
- People with disabilities (5)
- Reuse (5)
- West (5)
- Wyoming (5)
- California (4)
- Capital punishment (4)
- Clean Water Act (4)
- Conservation (4)
- Groundwater (4)
- Nevada (4)
- Women (4)
- Workforce Investment Act (4)
- 2000 (3)
- Case studies (3)
- Colorado Springs (3)
- Conjunctive use (3)
- Copyright (3)
- Corporate Law (3)
- Cost effectiveness (3)
- Death penalty (3)
- Death sentence (3)
- Publication
-
- All Faculty Scholarship (34)
- Water and Growth in the West (Summer Conference, June 7-9) (25)
- Faculty Scholarship (13)
- Faculty Publications (8)
- Articles (6)
-
- Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law (6)
- Legal Oral History Project (4)
- Center for Health Policy Research (3)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (3)
- Journal Articles (3)
- Law Faculty Articles and Essays (3)
- Policy Briefs Series, Institute for Community Inclusion (3)
- Resource Law Notes: The Newsletter of the Natural Resources Law Center (1984-2002) (3)
- Saffy Collection - All Textual Materials (3)
- Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications (3)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (2)
- Jepson School of Leadership Studies articles, book chapters and other publications (2)
- Library Staff Publications (2)
- Maine Women's Publications - All (2)
- Research to Practice Series, Institute for Community Inclusion (2)
- Scholarly Articles (2)
- Tools for Inclusion Series, Institute for Community Inclusion (2)
- Articles & Book Chapters (1)
- Criminal Justice Faculty Publications and Presentations (1)
- Criminal Justice Faculty Research (1)
- Department of Justice Studies Faculty Scholarship and Creative Works (1)
- Department of Public Health Scholarship and Creative Works (1)
- E-JASL 1999-2009 (Volumes 1-10) (1)
- Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications (1)
- Faculty Works (1)
- File Type
Articles 151 - 151 of 151
Full-Text Articles in Law
Sentimental Stereotypes: Emotional Expectations For High-And Low-Status Group Members, Larissa Z. Tiedens, Phoebe C. Ellsworth, Batja Mesquita
Sentimental Stereotypes: Emotional Expectations For High-And Low-Status Group Members, Larissa Z. Tiedens, Phoebe C. Ellsworth, Batja Mesquita
Articles
Three vignette studies examined stereotypes of the emotions associated with high- and low-status group members. In Study 1a, participants believed that in negative situations, high-status people feel more angry than sad or guilty and that low-status people feel more sad and guilty than angry. Study 1b showed that in response to positive outcomes, high-status people are expected to feel more pride and low-status people are expected to feel more appreciation. Study 2 showed that people also infer status from emotions: Angry and proud people are thought of as high status, whereas sad, guilty, and appreciative people are considered low status. …