Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- DePaul University (48)
- Selected Works (31)
- University of Montana (29)
- UIC School of Law (21)
- Fordham Law School (20)
-
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (20)
- University of Michigan Law School (20)
- Southern Methodist University (14)
- Seattle University School of Law (13)
- The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law (13)
- American University Washington College of Law (9)
- Brooklyn Law School (9)
- Cleveland State University (9)
- University of Oklahoma College of Law (9)
- University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School (9)
- Columbia Law School (8)
- Marquette University Law School (8)
- Boston University School of Law (7)
- Case Western Reserve University School of Law (7)
- Singapore Management University (7)
- UC Law SF (7)
- William & Mary Law School (7)
- University of Colorado Law School (6)
- University of Miami Law School (6)
- University of Minnesota Law School (6)
- California Western School of Law (5)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (5)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (5)
- Chicago-Kent College of Law (4)
- Georgetown University Law Center (4)
- Keyword
-
- Technology (36)
- Privacy (25)
- Artificial intelligence (24)
- Internet (16)
- Data (15)
-
- Regulation (15)
- Machine learning (13)
- AI (12)
- Automation (11)
- Bitcoin (11)
- Blockchain (9)
- GDPR (9)
- Innovation (9)
- Law (9)
- Intellectual property (8)
- Patents (8)
- Surveillance (8)
- Artificial Intelligence (7)
- Business (7)
- Copyright (7)
- Cryptocurrency (7)
- Fintech (7)
- Algorithms (6)
- Consumer (6)
- First Amendment (6)
- Fourth Amendment (6)
- Patent (6)
- Big data (5)
- Patent law (5)
- Software (5)
- Publication
-
- DePaul Journal of Art, Technology & Intellectual Property Law (48)
- Public Land & Resources Law Review (29)
- Faculty Scholarship (26)
- UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law (17)
- Canadian Journal of Law and Technology (15)
-
- Articles (14)
- SMU Science and Technology Law Review (13)
- Seattle University Law Review (13)
- All Faculty Scholarship (12)
- Catholic University Journal of Law and Technology (12)
- Fordham Law Review (11)
- Oklahoma Law Review (9)
- Fredric I. Lederer (8)
- Journal of Law, Technology, & the Internet (7)
- UC Law Science and Technology Journal (7)
- Cleveland State Law Review (6)
- Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal (6)
- Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review (6)
- Minnesota Journal of Law, Science & Technology (6)
- Publications (6)
- Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press (5)
- Faculty Publications (5)
- Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals (4)
- Brooklyn Journal of International Law (4)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (4)
- Journal of Law and Mobility (4)
- Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law (4)
- Santa Clara High Technology Law Journal (4)
- Articles & Chapters (3)
- Centre for AI & Data Governance (3)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 421 - 428 of 428
Full-Text Articles in Law
To Promote Innovation, Congress Should Abolish The Supreme Court Created Exceptions To 35 U.S. Code Sec. 101, Shahrokh Falati
To Promote Innovation, Congress Should Abolish The Supreme Court Created Exceptions To 35 U.S. Code Sec. 101, Shahrokh Falati
Articles & Chapters
No abstract provided.
Techno-Optimism & Access To The Legal System, Tanina Rostain
Techno-Optimism & Access To The Legal System, Tanina Rostain
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
For legal technologists, apps raise the prospect of putting the law in the hands of disadvantaged people who feel powerless to deal with their legal problems. These aspirations are heartening, but they rest on unrealistic assumptions about how people living in poverty deal with legal problems. People who are poor very rarely resort to the law to solve their problems. In the situations when they do seek solutions, they confront educational and material impediments to finding, understanding, and using online legal tools effectively. Literacy is a significant barrier. More than 15 percent of all adults living in the United States …
Computational Experimentation, Tabrez Y. Ebrahim
Computational Experimentation, Tabrez Y. Ebrahim
Faculty Scholarship
Experimentation conjures images of laboratories and equipment in biotechnology, chemistry, materials science, and pharmaceuticals. Yet modern day experimentation is not limited to only chemical synthesis, but is increasingly computational. Researchers in the unpredictable arts can experiment upon the functions, properties, reactions, and structures of chemical compounds with highly accurate computational techniques. These computational capabilities challenge the enablement and utility patentability requirements. The patent statute requires that the inventor explain how to make and use the invention without undue experimentation and that the invention have at least substantial and specific utility. These patentability requirements do not align with computational research capabilities, …
Automation And Predictive Analytics In Patent Prosecution: Uspto Implications And Policy, Tabrez Y. Ebrahim
Automation And Predictive Analytics In Patent Prosecution: Uspto Implications And Policy, Tabrez Y. Ebrahim
Faculty Scholarship
Artificial-intelligence technological advancements bring automation and predictive analytics into patent prosecution. The information asymmetry between inventors and patent examiners is expanded by artificial intelligence, which transforms the inventor-examiner interaction to machine-human interactions. In response to automated patent drafting, automated office-action responses, "cloems" (computer-generated word permutations) for defensive patenting, and machine-learning guidance (based on constantly updated patent-prosecution big data), the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) should reevaluate patent-examination policy from economic, fairness, time, and transparency perspectives. By conceptualizing the inventor-examiner relationship as a "patenting market," economic principles suggest stronger efficiencies if both inventors and the USPTO have better information …
Data-Centric Technologies: Patent And Copyright Doctrinal Disruptions, Tabrez Y. Ebrahim
Data-Centric Technologies: Patent And Copyright Doctrinal Disruptions, Tabrez Y. Ebrahim
Faculty Scholarship
Data-centric technologies create information content that directly controls, modifies, or responds to the physical world. This information content resides in the digital world yet has profound economic and societal impact in the physical world. 3D printing and artificial intelligence are examples of data-centric technologies. 3D printing utilizes digital data for eventual printing of physical goods. Artificial intelligence learns from data sets to make predictions or automated decisions for use in physical applications and systems. 3D printing and artificial intelligence technologies are based on digital foundations, blur the digital and physical divide, and dramatically improve physical goods, objects, products, or systems. …
Towards A New California Revised Uniform Fiduciary Access To Digital Assets Act, Michael T. Yu
Towards A New California Revised Uniform Fiduciary Access To Digital Assets Act, Michael T. Yu
Faculty Scholarship
California enacted the Revised Uniform Fiduciary Access to Digital Assets Act (the California RUFADAA) to govern the disclosure (or nondisclosure) of digital assets when a California resident dies. Digital assets include not just emails and social media accounts but may also include online files and assets, digital currencies, domain names, and blogs. The California RUFADAA ostensibly governs the disclosure of digital assets only when a California resident dies, and it, therefore, does not govern the scenario when a California resident becomes incapacitated and can no longer handle his or her digital assets. This scenario is likely to become more common …
The Value Of Deviance: Understanding Contextual Privacy, Timothy Casey
The Value Of Deviance: Understanding Contextual Privacy, Timothy Casey
Faculty Scholarship
Recent decisions by the Supreme Court in Carpenter v. United States and the Illinois Supreme Court in Rosenbach v. Six Flags Entertainment Corporation signal a shift in the traditional understanding of what exactly is protected by a privacy interest. Carpenter distinguished between a police officer’s observation of a suspect’s location and a perpetual catalogue of a person’s movements obtained through cell site location information (CSLI). The pervasive and vast quantity of information from CSLI exposed a protected privacy interest. In Rosenbach, the Illinois Supreme Court found the unique and personal quality of biometric information meant that consent and disclosure requirements …
Should Robots Prosecute And Defend?, Stephen E. Henderson