Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Regulatory agencies (4)
- Innovative models of regulation (3)
- Mercy (3)
- Regulatory policy making (3)
- Self-regulation (3)
-
- Administrative law (2)
- Aggregation (2)
- Average differences between groups (2)
- Bureaucracy (2)
- Business responses to regulation (2)
- Christian scholarship (2)
- Clemency (2)
- Cost-benefit analysis (2)
- Criminal justice (2)
- Criminal procedure (2)
- Disparities between groups (2)
- Empirical research (2)
- Evaluation of social effects of voluntary environmental initiatives (2)
- Evangelicals (2)
- Federal regulations (2)
- Forgiveness (2)
- Law as morality (2)
- Law review articles (2)
- Pardon (2)
- Parole (2)
- Regulatory process (2)
- Regulatory review (2)
- Scholarly literature (2)
- Sentencing (2)
- State and federal regulation (2)
Articles 31 - 32 of 32
Full-Text Articles in Law
Much Ado About Nothing?, Cary Coglianese
Much Ado About Nothing?, Cary Coglianese
All Faculty Scholarship
Policy scholars and decision makers should be careful before concluding that President Bush's recent Executive Order 13422 will result in "paralysis by analysis." That lament has been heard about other changes to rule making procedures over the last seven decades, yet steady increases in the cost and volume of federal regulations during that time period clearly indicate that paralysis has yet to set in. Administrative procedures are embedded within a complex web of politics, institutions, and organizational behavior. Within that web, procedures are but one factor influencing government agencies.
Polyphonic Stare Decisis: Listening To Non-Article Iii Actors, Kermit Roosevelt Iii
Polyphonic Stare Decisis: Listening To Non-Article Iii Actors, Kermit Roosevelt Iii
All Faculty Scholarship
This article explores the input that non-Article III actors can and should have in the Supreme Court’s decision to reconsider a prior constitutional decision. It employs a model of constitutional decision-making that distinguishes between the articulation of constitutional meaning and the construction of constitutional doctrine to identify several different stages at which a court can adhere to or depart from precedent and examines the persuasive power of non-Article III input at each stage.