Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- President (3)
- Administrative law (1)
- Anticanon (1)
- Biden Administration (1)
- Checks and balances (1)
-
- Congress (1)
- Constitutional hardball (1)
- Constitutional interpretation (1)
- Constitutional law (1)
- Court (1)
- Donald Trump (1)
- Election (1)
- Executive branch norms (1)
- Executive power (1)
- Foreign Affairs (1)
- General Services Administration (GSA) (1)
- Historical gloss (1)
- National Security (1)
- Notice-and-comment (1)
- Passports (1)
- Presidency (1)
- President-elect (1)
- Presidential Power (1)
- Presidential administration (1)
- Presidential power (1)
- Presidential transition (1)
- Public comments (1)
- Regulation (1)
- Regulatory (1)
- Separation of powers (1)
- Publication
Articles 1 - 14 of 14
Full-Text Articles in Law
"A Mystifying And Distorting Factor": The Electoral College And American Democracy, Katherine A. Shaw
"A Mystifying And Distorting Factor": The Electoral College And American Democracy, Katherine A. Shaw
Articles
A Review of Let the People Pick the President: The Case for Abolishing the Electoral College. By Jesse Wegman.
The False Allure Of The Anti-Accumulation Principle, Michael E. Herz, Kevin M. Stack
The False Allure Of The Anti-Accumulation Principle, Michael E. Herz, Kevin M. Stack
Articles
Today the executive branch is generally seen as the most dangerous branch. Many worry that the executive branch now defies or subsumes the separation of powers. In response, several Supreme Court Justices and prominent scholars assert that the very separation-of-powers principles that determine the structure of the federal government as a whole apply with full force within the executive branch. In particular, they argue that constitutional law prohibits the accumulation of more than one type of power—legislative, executive, and judicial—in the same executive official or government entity. We refer to this as the anti-accumulation principle. The consequences of this principle, …
Lawyering The Presidency, Deborah Pearlstein
Lawyering The Presidency, Deborah Pearlstein
Articles
Among its many profound effects on American life, the Trump presidency has triggered a surge of interest in the project of law reform to better check the exercise of presidential power. Yet these reform efforts arise against a wholly unsettled debate about the function and effectiveness of existing checks, perhaps none more so than the role of executive branch legal counsel. With courts often deferential, and Congress hamstrung by partisan polarization, scholars have drawn on the experiences of executive branch lawyers to assess whether counsel functions as part of an “internal separation of powers” form of constraint. Yet while these …
Responding To Mass, Computer-Generated, And Malattributed Comments, Steven J. Balla, Reeve Bull, Bridget C.E. Dooling, Emily Hammond, Michael A. Livermore, Michael Herz, Beth Simone Noveck
Responding To Mass, Computer-Generated, And Malattributed Comments, Steven J. Balla, Reeve Bull, Bridget C.E. Dooling, Emily Hammond, Michael A. Livermore, Michael Herz, Beth Simone Noveck
Articles
A number of technological and political forces have transformed the once staid and insider dominated notice-and-comment process into a forum for large scale, sometimes messy, participation in regulatory decisionmaking. It is not unheard of for agencies to receive millions of comments on rulemakings; often these comments are received as part of organized mass comment campaigns. In some rulemakings, questions have been raised about whether public comments were submitted under false names, or were automatically generated by computer “bot” programs. In this Article, we examine whether and to what extent such submissions are problematic and make recommendations for how rulemaking agencies …
Transition Administration, Michael Herz, Katherine A. Shaw
Transition Administration, Michael Herz, Katherine A. Shaw
Articles
The period from November 3, 2020 to January 20, 2021, was unlike any presidential transition in our history. President Donald Trump refused to accept his ballot-box defeat, instead battling to overturn the election’s outcome. This dramatic public campaign was waged in state and federal courts, state legislatures, the offices of state and local election officials, the Department of Justice, and finally the halls of Congress, where on January 6, 2021, a mob incited by the President stormed the Capitol with the explicit goal of preventing the final counting of electoral votes for Joe Biden. These efforts had more mundane and …
Article I: Reforming The War Powers Resolution For The 21st Century, Rebecca Ingber
Article I: Reforming The War Powers Resolution For The 21st Century, Rebecca Ingber
Testimony
Professor Rebecca Ingber testified at a U.S. House Committee on Rules hearing on March 23, 2021, titled "Article I: Reforming the War Powers Resolution for the 21st Century."
The Gsa’S Delay In Recognizing The Biden Transition Team And The National Security Implications, Katherine A. Shaw, Ryan Goodman
The Gsa’S Delay In Recognizing The Biden Transition Team And The National Security Implications, Katherine A. Shaw, Ryan Goodman
Online Publications
Pressure is mounting on a usually low-profile government official to activate the full range of resources ordinarily provided to an incoming administration’s presidential transition team. Under the Presidential Transition Act of 1963, a statute that has been revised a number of times since passage, it is not until the Administrator of the General Services Administration (GSA) “ascertain[s]” the “apparent successful candidate” of a presidential election that the president-elect and his transition team gain access to the office space, funds, briefings, and other government resources necessary to effect a smooth and effective transfer of power.
The Executive Branch Anticanon, Deborah Pearlstein
The Executive Branch Anticanon, Deborah Pearlstein
Articles
Donald Trump’s presidency has given rise to a raft of concerns not just about the wisdom of particular policy decisions but also about the prospect that executive actions might have troubling longer term “precedential” effects. While critics tend to leave undefined what “precedent” in this context means, existing constitutional structures provide multiple mechanisms by which presidential practice can influence future executive branch conduct: judicial actors rely on practice as gloss on constitutional meaning, executive branch officials rely on past practice in guiding institutional norms of behavior, and elected officials outside the executive branch and the people themselves draw on past …
Abolish Ice . . . And Then What?, Peter L. Markowitz
Abolish Ice . . . And Then What?, Peter L. Markowitz
Articles
In recent years, activists and then politicians began calling for the abolition of the United States’s interior immigration-enforcement agency: U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Many people have misinterpreted the call to “Abolish ICE” as merely a spontaneous rhetorical device used to express outrage at the current Administration’s brutal immigration policies. In fact, abolishing ICE is the natural extension of years of thoughtful organizing by a loose coalition of grassroots immigrant-rights groups. These organizations are serious, not only about their literal goal to eliminate the agency, but also about not replacing it with another dedicated agency of immigration police. Accordingly, …
Plus Ça Change: A Century-Old Removal For Cause, Michael E. Herz
Plus Ça Change: A Century-Old Removal For Cause, Michael E. Herz
Online Publications
Lots of ink has been spilled over when Congress can give federal officials for-cause protection. One would think that a necessary antecedent to that discussion would be a determination of exactly what for-cause protection entails. What is “inefficiency, neglect of duty, or malfeasance in office”? Yet no one knows; the debate over the permissibility of that restriction proceeds in blissful uncertainty as to its scope.
Should The President’S Words Matter In Court?, Katherine A. Shaw
Should The President’S Words Matter In Court?, Katherine A. Shaw
Online Publications
The most striking aspect of last Thursday’s opinion by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, which rejected the Trump administration’s latest effort to revive its travel ban for individuals from six predominantly Muslim countries, was its reliance on Donald Trump’s own words as candidate, president-elect and president. The court leaned particularly heavily on his now-famous campaign statement that he was “calling for a total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States.”
The Courts And National Security: The Ordeal Of The State Secrets Privilege, David Rudenstine
The Courts And National Security: The Ordeal Of The State Secrets Privilege, David Rudenstine
Articles
No abstract provided.
The Powers Of Congress And The President On Matters That Affect U.S. Foreign Affairs, Malvina Halberstam
The Powers Of Congress And The President On Matters That Affect U.S. Foreign Affairs, Malvina Halberstam
Articles
No abstract provided.
After Deference: Formalizing The Judicial Power For Foreign Relations Law, Deborah Pearlstein
After Deference: Formalizing The Judicial Power For Foreign Relations Law, Deborah Pearlstein
Articles
How much deference should courts afford executive branch interpretations of statutes and treaties? The question that has long engaged foreign relations scholars has found new salience as it has become apparent in recent years that the Supreme Court will neither abstain nor reliably defer to presidential judgment even in cases implicating national security. As the courts grapple with the scope of detention authority granted by Congress’ 2001 Authorization for the Use of Military Force, or the limits on that authority under the Geneva Conventions, a number of scholars have embraced administrative law deference doctrines such as that in Chevron v. …