Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Ohio (47)
- State law; State administrative decision; (41)
- Utah (7)
- California (6)
- Nevada (6)
-
- State law; State administrative decision (6)
- Water transfers (6)
- Beneficial use (5)
- Irrigation (5)
- New Mexico (5)
- West (5)
- Wyoming (5)
- Arizona (4)
- Colorado (3)
- Exchanges (3)
- Land Use (3)
- Public Land Law (3)
- Public Lands (3)
- Surface water (3)
- United States (3)
- Arizona v. California (2)
- Arvin-Edison Water Storage District (2)
- Boulder Canyon Project Act (2)
- Bureau of Reclamation (2)
- Central Arizona Project (2)
- Central Valley Project (2)
- Changing demands (2)
- Changing economic conditions (2)
- Conservation (2)
- Demand reductions (2)
- Publication
-
- Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions (47)
- Moving the West's Water to New Uses: Winners and Losers (Summer Conference, June 6-8) (19)
- Annual of the Arkansas Natural Resources Law Institute (3)
- Resource Law Notes: The Newsletter of the Natural Resources Law Center (1984-2002) (3)
- United States v. Washington, Docket No. 90-35355 (935 F.2d 1059 (9th Cir. 1991)) (2)
Articles 61 - 77 of 77
Full-Text Articles in Law
Agenda: Moving The West's Water To New Uses: Winners And Losers, University Of Colorado Boulder. Natural Resources Law Center
Agenda: Moving The West's Water To New Uses: Winners And Losers, University Of Colorado Boulder. Natural Resources Law Center
Moving the West's Water to New Uses: Winners and Losers (Summer Conference, June 6-8)
Conference organizers and/or faculty included University of Colorado Law School professors Lawrence J. MacDonnell and Mark Squillace.
Moving the West's Water to New Uses: Winners and Losers will be the theme for this year's water conference, June 6-8 at the Law School in Boulder. The conference will consider the changing demands for water in the West and the need to reallocate a portion of the existing uses of water to new uses.
The first day will provide the background by looking at the most likely sources of water to meet these demands, including agriculture, federal water projects, interstate transfers, and …
Federal And State Water Quality Regulation And Law In Missouri, Peter N. Davis
Federal And State Water Quality Regulation And Law In Missouri, Peter N. Davis
Faculty Publications
This article discusses that law in two parts. The first part examines the federal and Missouri waste discharge regulatory system. The second part analyzes common law rights and remedies related to water pollution.
Appeal No. 0376: Redman Oil Company, Inc. V. J. Michael Biddison, Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Appeal No. 0376: Redman Oil Company, Inc. V. J. Michael Biddison, Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 89-516
Appeal No. 0344: Coshocton Pipe Company V.J. Michael Biddson, Chief Difision Of Oil & Gas Ohio Department Of Natural Resources, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0344: Coshocton Pipe Company V.J. Michael Biddson, Chief Difision Of Oil & Gas Ohio Department Of Natural Resources, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Review of Chief's Order 89-16 and 89-335
Appeal No. 0353: Coshocton Pipe Company V.J. Michael Biddson, Chief Difision Of Oil & Gas Ohio Department Of Natural Resources, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0353: Coshocton Pipe Company V.J. Michael Biddson, Chief Difision Of Oil & Gas Ohio Department Of Natural Resources, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Review of Chief's Order 89-16 and 89-335
Inheritance By Illegitimates In Arkansas: Statue And Case Decisions, John Land Mcdavid
Inheritance By Illegitimates In Arkansas: Statue And Case Decisions, John Land Mcdavid
Annual of the Arkansas Natural Resources Law Institute
No abstract provided.
Resource Law Notes Newsletter, No. 19, Mar. 1990, University Of Colorado Boulder. Natural Resources Law Center
Resource Law Notes Newsletter, No. 19, Mar. 1990, University Of Colorado Boulder. Natural Resources Law Center
Resource Law Notes: The Newsletter of the Natural Resources Law Center (1984-2002)
No abstract provided.
The Arkansas Supreme Court V. Landmen Title Examiners: Recent Oil & Gas Decisions, J. H. Evans
The Arkansas Supreme Court V. Landmen Title Examiners: Recent Oil & Gas Decisions, J. H. Evans
Annual of the Arkansas Natural Resources Law Institute
No abstract provided.
Well Site Operations & Surface Damages: Assessing Lieabilities And Calculating Damages, Douglas M. Carson
Well Site Operations & Surface Damages: Assessing Lieabilities And Calculating Damages, Douglas M. Carson
Annual of the Arkansas Natural Resources Law Institute
No abstract provided.
Appeal No. 0362: Ohio Farmers Insurance Company V. J. Michael Biddison, Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Appeal No. 0362: Ohio Farmers Insurance Company V. J. Michael Biddison, Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 87-318
Appeal No. 0350: Petro Drilling Corp. V. J. Michael Biddison, Chief, Division Of Oil & Gas, Department Of Natural Resources, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0350: Petro Drilling Corp. V. J. Michael Biddison, Chief, Division Of Oil & Gas, Department Of Natural Resources, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Review of Chief's Order 89-129
Appeal No. 0351: Petro Drilling Corp. V. J. Michael Biddison, Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Appeal No. 0351: Petro Drilling Corp. V. J. Michael Biddison, Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 89-223
Appeal No. 0369: D. G. Haney V. J. Michael Biddison, Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Appeal No. 0369: D. G. Haney V. J. Michael Biddison, Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 89-503
Appeal No. 0336: Kiel Oil And Gas Co. V. J. Michael Biddison, Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Appeal No. 0336: Kiel Oil And Gas Co. V. J. Michael Biddison, Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 88-1595
Appeal No. 0352: Johnson Oil & Gas Co. V. J. Michael Biddison, Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Appeal No. 0352: Johnson Oil & Gas Co. V. J. Michael Biddison, Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 89-331
State Control Of Great Lakes Water Diversion, J. David Prince
State Control Of Great Lakes Water Diversion, J. David Prince
Faculty Scholarship
This article focuses on the law relevant to the issue of interbasin diversion of Great Lakes water, the policies reflected in that law, and the limitations of the law on such diversions and on the ability of the Great Lakes states to control proposed diversions. It concludes with an argument for regional as opposed to national or state-by-state decision making on the issue of diversions and a suggested mechanism for facilitating such regional decision making.
Preface, Charles F. Wilkinson