Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
- Publication
-
- United States v. Lummi Indian Tribe, Docket No. 98-35964 (235 F.3d 443 (9th Cir. 2000)) (6)
- Washington v. United States, Puget Sound Shellfish Growers v. United States, Alexander v. United States, 26 Tideland and Upland Private Property Owners v. United States, Docket Nos. 98-1028, 98-1026, 98-1039, 98-1052 (526 U.S. 1060 (1999)) (6)
- United States v. Washington, Docket Nos. 99-35104, 99-35140 (235 F.3d 438 (9th Cir. 2000)) (4)
- Articles (1)
Articles 1 - 17 of 17
Full-Text Articles in Law
Appellant State Of Washington's Reply Brief
Appellant State Of Washington's Reply Brief
United States v. Washington, Docket Nos. 99-35104, 99-35140 (235 F.3d 438 (9th Cir. 2000))
No abstract provided.
Appellee Confederated Tribes Of The Chehalis Reservation Answering Brief
Appellee Confederated Tribes Of The Chehalis Reservation Answering Brief
United States v. Washington, Docket Nos. 99-35104, 99-35140 (235 F.3d 438 (9th Cir. 2000))
No abstract provided.
Answering Brief Of Appellee Quinault Indian Nation
Answering Brief Of Appellee Quinault Indian Nation
United States v. Washington, Docket Nos. 99-35104, 99-35140 (235 F.3d 438 (9th Cir. 2000))
No abstract provided.
Appellant State Of Washington's Opening Brief
Appellant State Of Washington's Opening Brief
United States v. Washington, Docket Nos. 99-35104, 99-35140 (235 F.3d 438 (9th Cir. 2000))
No abstract provided.
Upow's Reply Briefs In Opposition
Upow's Reply Briefs In Opposition
Washington v. United States, Puget Sound Shellfish Growers v. United States, Alexander v. United States, 26 Tideland and Upland Private Property Owners v. United States, Docket Nos. 98-1028, 98-1026, 98-1039, 98-1052 (526 U.S. 1060 (1999))
No abstract provided.
Puget Sound Shellfish Growers' Brief In Reply
Puget Sound Shellfish Growers' Brief In Reply
Washington v. United States, Puget Sound Shellfish Growers v. United States, Alexander v. United States, 26 Tideland and Upland Private Property Owners v. United States, Docket Nos. 98-1028, 98-1026, 98-1039, 98-1052 (526 U.S. 1060 (1999))
No abstract provided.
Private Owners' Reply To Brief In Opposition
Private Owners' Reply To Brief In Opposition
Washington v. United States, Puget Sound Shellfish Growers v. United States, Alexander v. United States, 26 Tideland and Upland Private Property Owners v. United States, Docket Nos. 98-1028, 98-1026, 98-1039, 98-1052 (526 U.S. 1060 (1999))
No abstract provided.
Reply Brief Of Defendant- Appellant Lummi Nation
Reply Brief Of Defendant- Appellant Lummi Nation
United States v. Lummi Indian Tribe, Docket No. 98-35964 (235 F.3d 443 (9th Cir. 2000))
No abstract provided.
Brief For The United States In Opposition
Brief For The United States In Opposition
Washington v. United States, Puget Sound Shellfish Growers v. United States, Alexander v. United States, 26 Tideland and Upland Private Property Owners v. United States, Docket Nos. 98-1028, 98-1026, 98-1039, 98-1052 (526 U.S. 1060 (1999))
No abstract provided.
Brief Amici Curiae Of Inner Sound Crab Association, Joe Verdoes, And Washington Dungeness Crab Fishermen's Association, Tom Kelley, In Support Of Petitioner, State Of Washington
Washington v. United States, Puget Sound Shellfish Growers v. United States, Alexander v. United States, 26 Tideland and Upland Private Property Owners v. United States, Docket Nos. 98-1028, 98-1026, 98-1039, 98-1052 (526 U.S. 1060 (1999))
No abstract provided.
Respondent Indian Tribes' Brief In Opposition
Respondent Indian Tribes' Brief In Opposition
Washington v. United States, Puget Sound Shellfish Growers v. United States, Alexander v. United States, 26 Tideland and Upland Private Property Owners v. United States, Docket Nos. 98-1028, 98-1026, 98-1039, 98-1052 (526 U.S. 1060 (1999))
No abstract provided.
Brief Of Plaintiff-Intervenor/Appellee Muckleshoot Indian Tribe
Brief Of Plaintiff-Intervenor/Appellee Muckleshoot Indian Tribe
United States v. Lummi Indian Tribe, Docket No. 98-35964 (235 F.3d 443 (9th Cir. 2000))
No abstract provided.
Opening Brief Of Interested Party- Appellees The Tulalip Tribes Of Washington
Opening Brief Of Interested Party- Appellees The Tulalip Tribes Of Washington
United States v. Lummi Indian Tribe, Docket No. 98-35964 (235 F.3d 443 (9th Cir. 2000))
No abstract provided.
Opening Brief Of Plaintiff- Appellees Four Tribes
Opening Brief Of Plaintiff- Appellees Four Tribes
United States v. Lummi Indian Tribe, Docket No. 98-35964 (235 F.3d 443 (9th Cir. 2000))
No abstract provided.
Opening Brief Of Defendant - Appellant Lummi Nation
Opening Brief Of Defendant - Appellant Lummi Nation
United States v. Lummi Indian Tribe, Docket No. 98-35964 (235 F.3d 443 (9th Cir. 2000))
No abstract provided.
Opening Brief Of Defendant- Appellant Lummi Nation
Opening Brief Of Defendant- Appellant Lummi Nation
United States v. Lummi Indian Tribe, Docket No. 98-35964 (235 F.3d 443 (9th Cir. 2000))
No abstract provided.
Managing State Trust Lands For Ecosystem Health: The Case Of Washington State's Range And Agricultural Lands, Gregory A. Hicks
Managing State Trust Lands For Ecosystem Health: The Case Of Washington State's Range And Agricultural Lands, Gregory A. Hicks
Articles
The protection of ecosystem health and wildlife habitat on state trust lands has received increasing attention in public lands literature. This article is meant to contribute to that discussion. It is focused on recently adopted land management policies in Washington state which are intended to restore ecosystem health and wildlife habitat on the 1.1 million acres of range and agricultural trust lands in the upland interior of the state's Columbia Plain. The lands in question are lands originally granted to Washington at statehood by the federal government for the support of the common schools and other public institutions. Those lands …