Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
- Publication
-
- United States v. Lummi Indian Tribe, Docket No. 98-35964 (235 F.3d 443 (9th Cir. 2000)) (6)
- Washington Law Review (6)
- Washington v. United States, Puget Sound Shellfish Growers v. United States, Alexander v. United States, 26 Tideland and Upland Private Property Owners v. United States, Docket Nos. 98-1028, 98-1026, 98-1039, 98-1052 (526 U.S. 1060 (1999)) (6)
- United States v. Washington, Docket Nos. 99-35104, 99-35140 (235 F.3d 438 (9th Cir. 2000)) (4)
- Articles (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 23 of 23
Full-Text Articles in Law
Appellant State Of Washington's Reply Brief
Appellant State Of Washington's Reply Brief
United States v. Washington, Docket Nos. 99-35104, 99-35140 (235 F.3d 438 (9th Cir. 2000))
No abstract provided.
Appellee Confederated Tribes Of The Chehalis Reservation Answering Brief
Appellee Confederated Tribes Of The Chehalis Reservation Answering Brief
United States v. Washington, Docket Nos. 99-35104, 99-35140 (235 F.3d 438 (9th Cir. 2000))
No abstract provided.
Answering Brief Of Appellee Quinault Indian Nation
Answering Brief Of Appellee Quinault Indian Nation
United States v. Washington, Docket Nos. 99-35104, 99-35140 (235 F.3d 438 (9th Cir. 2000))
No abstract provided.
What A Salmon Czar Might Hope For, William H. Rodgers Jr.
What A Salmon Czar Might Hope For, William H. Rodgers Jr.
Washington Law Review
Senate Bill 5595 is denominated "Salmon Recovery Funding." It is a structural and planning law. It authorizes establishment of a Salmon Recovery Funding Board that will fix criteria and allocate funds for "salmon habitat projects" and "salmon recovery activities." The projects include habitat restoration and protection; the activities include preparation of stream corridor guidelines and programmatic permitting endeavors. The Board will work from a "habitat project list" that is to be developed by a "critical pathways methodology." This approach is defined as "a project scheduling and management process for examining interactions between habitat projects and salmonid species prioritizing habitat projects, …
The Take And Give Of Esa Administration: The Need For Creative Solutions In The Face Of Expanding Regulatory Proscriptions, Christine O. Gregoire, Robert K. Costello
The Take And Give Of Esa Administration: The Need For Creative Solutions In The Face Of Expanding Regulatory Proscriptions, Christine O. Gregoire, Robert K. Costello
Washington Law Review
Salmon play a significant role in the culture, economy, and ecology of Washington State. Their threatened extinctions have led to a string of listings under the federal Endangered Species Act. This Article considers our response to these listings and the relationship of that response to federal oversight. Part I discusses how the ESA will affect the actions and activities of state and local governments and the citizens they serve. Part II discusses the need for latitude on the part of the federal agencies in assessing the value of state conservation and recovery efforts. This Article concludes that the plight of …
Truce In The Salmon War: Alternatives For The Pacific Salmon Treaty, Karol De Zwager Brown
Truce In The Salmon War: Alternatives For The Pacific Salmon Treaty, Karol De Zwager Brown
Washington Law Review
The 1985 Pacific Salmon Treaty was heralded as an end to the ongoing international dispute between the United States and Canada over Pacific salmon fishing rights. The Treaty, however, failed to define adequately the principles and processes for allocating salmon harvests between the two countries. The parties to the Treaty have been unable to reach consensus on annual salmon harvests since 1992, fueling a growing conflict which has threatened to spill over to issues beyond the fishery dispute. This Article examines the historical context of the "salmon war," highlighting changes in international law and domestic politics that affected the formation …
How Do You Learn From A River? Managing Uncertainty In Species Conservation Policy, John M. Volkman
How Do You Learn From A River? Managing Uncertainty In Species Conservation Policy, John M. Volkman
Washington Law Review
As the Puget Sound region embarks on a new chapter in the story of the Endangered Species Act, experiences with fish and wildlife restoration efforts in other locations can be instructive. This Article reviews conservation efforts in the Columbia River Basin, and it explains the major role that scientific uncertainty plays in salmon conservation efforts. This discussion describes the debate between traditional fish and wildlife management, which focuses more on individual populations and mitigation technologies, and recent scientific reports, which urge more reliance on naturally functioning rivers and watersheds. The Article also describes a variety of learning tools that have …
Salmon And The Endangered Species Act: Lessons From The Columbia Basin, Michael C. Blumm, Greg D. Corbin
Salmon And The Endangered Species Act: Lessons From The Columbia Basin, Michael C. Blumm, Greg D. Corbin
Washington Law Review
Within the last decade, the Columbia Basin, once home to the world's largest salmon runs, has witnessed numerous listings of its signature natural resource under the Endangered Species Act (ESA). These listings have propelled the ESA into the forefront of land and water use decisionmaking across a vast landscape of the Pacific Northwest This Article examines the Columbia Basin salmon listings and their aftermath. Specifically, it considers the effect of the ESA's consultation requirements on hydroelectric, hatchery, harvest, and habitat decisionmaking. The Article draws several lessons from this examination, many of them surprising, including the assertion that the listings have …
The Role Of Rights In Benefit Cost Methodology: The Example Of Salmon And Hydroelectric Dams, Richard O. Zerbe Jr., Linda J. Graham
The Role Of Rights In Benefit Cost Methodology: The Example Of Salmon And Hydroelectric Dams, Richard O. Zerbe Jr., Linda J. Graham
Washington Law Review
Benefit cost analysis is a well-established technique for assessing the impacts of proposed actions. Accurate benefit cost analysis is essential to making informed decisions through an understanding of the trade-offs involved in alternative actions. This Article presents a methodology for improving current benefit cost techniques and hence the usefulness of benefit cost analysis to decisionmakers. The proposed methodology is based on recognition of the roles of legal rights and psychological expectations in benefit cost analysis. Proper consideration of these rights and expectations is critical to an accurate determination of how benefits and costs are measured and whose interests are included …
Appellant State Of Washington's Opening Brief
Appellant State Of Washington's Opening Brief
United States v. Washington, Docket Nos. 99-35104, 99-35140 (235 F.3d 438 (9th Cir. 2000))
No abstract provided.
Upow's Reply Briefs In Opposition
Upow's Reply Briefs In Opposition
Washington v. United States, Puget Sound Shellfish Growers v. United States, Alexander v. United States, 26 Tideland and Upland Private Property Owners v. United States, Docket Nos. 98-1028, 98-1026, 98-1039, 98-1052 (526 U.S. 1060 (1999))
No abstract provided.
Puget Sound Shellfish Growers' Brief In Reply
Puget Sound Shellfish Growers' Brief In Reply
Washington v. United States, Puget Sound Shellfish Growers v. United States, Alexander v. United States, 26 Tideland and Upland Private Property Owners v. United States, Docket Nos. 98-1028, 98-1026, 98-1039, 98-1052 (526 U.S. 1060 (1999))
No abstract provided.
Private Owners' Reply To Brief In Opposition
Private Owners' Reply To Brief In Opposition
Washington v. United States, Puget Sound Shellfish Growers v. United States, Alexander v. United States, 26 Tideland and Upland Private Property Owners v. United States, Docket Nos. 98-1028, 98-1026, 98-1039, 98-1052 (526 U.S. 1060 (1999))
No abstract provided.
Reply Brief Of Defendant- Appellant Lummi Nation
Reply Brief Of Defendant- Appellant Lummi Nation
United States v. Lummi Indian Tribe, Docket No. 98-35964 (235 F.3d 443 (9th Cir. 2000))
No abstract provided.
Brief For The United States In Opposition
Brief For The United States In Opposition
Washington v. United States, Puget Sound Shellfish Growers v. United States, Alexander v. United States, 26 Tideland and Upland Private Property Owners v. United States, Docket Nos. 98-1028, 98-1026, 98-1039, 98-1052 (526 U.S. 1060 (1999))
No abstract provided.
Brief Amici Curiae Of Inner Sound Crab Association, Joe Verdoes, And Washington Dungeness Crab Fishermen's Association, Tom Kelley, In Support Of Petitioner, State Of Washington
Washington v. United States, Puget Sound Shellfish Growers v. United States, Alexander v. United States, 26 Tideland and Upland Private Property Owners v. United States, Docket Nos. 98-1028, 98-1026, 98-1039, 98-1052 (526 U.S. 1060 (1999))
No abstract provided.
Respondent Indian Tribes' Brief In Opposition
Respondent Indian Tribes' Brief In Opposition
Washington v. United States, Puget Sound Shellfish Growers v. United States, Alexander v. United States, 26 Tideland and Upland Private Property Owners v. United States, Docket Nos. 98-1028, 98-1026, 98-1039, 98-1052 (526 U.S. 1060 (1999))
No abstract provided.
Brief Of Plaintiff-Intervenor/Appellee Muckleshoot Indian Tribe
Brief Of Plaintiff-Intervenor/Appellee Muckleshoot Indian Tribe
United States v. Lummi Indian Tribe, Docket No. 98-35964 (235 F.3d 443 (9th Cir. 2000))
No abstract provided.
Opening Brief Of Interested Party- Appellees The Tulalip Tribes Of Washington
Opening Brief Of Interested Party- Appellees The Tulalip Tribes Of Washington
United States v. Lummi Indian Tribe, Docket No. 98-35964 (235 F.3d 443 (9th Cir. 2000))
No abstract provided.
Opening Brief Of Plaintiff- Appellees Four Tribes
Opening Brief Of Plaintiff- Appellees Four Tribes
United States v. Lummi Indian Tribe, Docket No. 98-35964 (235 F.3d 443 (9th Cir. 2000))
No abstract provided.
Opening Brief Of Defendant - Appellant Lummi Nation
Opening Brief Of Defendant - Appellant Lummi Nation
United States v. Lummi Indian Tribe, Docket No. 98-35964 (235 F.3d 443 (9th Cir. 2000))
No abstract provided.
Opening Brief Of Defendant- Appellant Lummi Nation
Opening Brief Of Defendant- Appellant Lummi Nation
United States v. Lummi Indian Tribe, Docket No. 98-35964 (235 F.3d 443 (9th Cir. 2000))
No abstract provided.
Managing State Trust Lands For Ecosystem Health: The Case Of Washington State's Range And Agricultural Lands, Gregory A. Hicks
Managing State Trust Lands For Ecosystem Health: The Case Of Washington State's Range And Agricultural Lands, Gregory A. Hicks
Articles
The protection of ecosystem health and wildlife habitat on state trust lands has received increasing attention in public lands literature. This article is meant to contribute to that discussion. It is focused on recently adopted land management policies in Washington state which are intended to restore ecosystem health and wildlife habitat on the 1.1 million acres of range and agricultural trust lands in the upland interior of the state's Columbia Plain. The lands in question are lands originally granted to Washington at statehood by the federal government for the support of the common schools and other public institutions. Those lands …