Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Selected Works (21)
- Suffolk University (21)
- Brooklyn Law School (19)
- University of Georgia School of Law (18)
- University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School (12)
-
- University of Michigan Law School (11)
- Roger Williams University (9)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (7)
- Fordham Law School (5)
- Mercer University School of Law (5)
- Notre Dame Law School (5)
- Seattle University School of Law (5)
- Boston University School of Law (4)
- Cornell University Law School (4)
- American University Washington College of Law (3)
- Columbia Law School (3)
- Florida A&M University College of Law (3)
- Florida State University College of Law (3)
- SelectedWorks (3)
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock William H. Bowen School of Law (3)
- University of Colorado Law School (3)
- University of Dayton (3)
- Brigham Young University Law School (2)
- Georgia State University (2)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (2)
- Southern Methodist University (2)
- St. John's University School of Law (2)
- Universitas Indonesia (2)
- University at Buffalo School of Law (2)
- University of Baltimore Law (2)
- Keyword
-
- Litigation (22)
- Civil procedure (18)
- Class actions (15)
- Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (7)
- Court (6)
-
- Judges (6)
- Section 1983 (6)
- Supreme Court (6)
- Civil rights (5)
- Compensation (5)
- Constitutional law (5)
- Discrimination (5)
- Government (5)
- Insurance (5)
- Judge (5)
- Police (5)
- Settlements (5)
- Courts (4)
- Disclosure (4)
- Ethics (4)
- Evidence (4)
- ICJ (4)
- Law enforcement (4)
- Lawyers (4)
- Legislation (4)
- Privacy (4)
- Securities and Exchange Commission (4)
- Transnational litigation (4)
- Trial (4)
- Arbitration (3)
- Publication
-
- Suffolk Journal of Trial and Appellate Advocacy (21)
- Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law (14)
- Faculty Scholarship (13)
- All Faculty Scholarship (11)
- Brooklyn Journal of Corporate, Financial & Commercial Law (8)
-
- Touro Law Review (7)
- Brooklyn Law Review (5)
- Jay Tidmarsh (5)
- Life of the Law School (1993- ) (5)
- Mercer Law Review (5)
- Seattle University Law Review (5)
- Articles (4)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (4)
- Notre Dame Law Review (4)
- Educational Leadership Faculty Publications (3)
- Florida State University Law Review (3)
- Fordham Urban Law Journal (3)
- Law School Blogs (3)
- Michigan Telecommunications & Technology Law Review (3)
- Publications (3)
- Brooklyn Journal of International Law (2)
- Buffalo Environmental Law Journal (2)
- D'Andre Devon Lampkin (2)
- Eloisa C Rodríguez-Dod (2)
- Faculty Publications (2)
- Fordham Law Review (2)
- Georgia State University Copyright Lawsuit (2)
- Howard M Wasserman (2)
- Indonesia Law Review (2)
- Journal Articles (2)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 181 - 210 of 219
Full-Text Articles in Law
Fool Me Twice: Zubik V. Burwell And The Perils Of Judicial Faith In Government Claims, Mark L. Rienzi
Fool Me Twice: Zubik V. Burwell And The Perils Of Judicial Faith In Government Claims, Mark L. Rienzi
Scholarly Articles
This article proceeds in three parts. Part I examines the three government concessions that made the Supreme Court’s Zubik decision possible and how those concessions ultimately revealed that it is possible to protect both contraceptive access and religious liberty. Part II discusses how the circuit courts were brought to emphatically adopt positions the government would ultimately abandon under the slightest pressure. Part III concludes with some key lessons lower courts should take from Zubik to better protect the integrity of both the court system and religious-liberty laws.
Nfc Technology Llc V. Htc America, Inc.: Judge Bryson's Sitting-By-Designation Guide To Securing Stays In Light Of Inter Partes Reviews, Jonathan Stroud
Nfc Technology Llc V. Htc America, Inc.: Judge Bryson's Sitting-By-Designation Guide To Securing Stays In Light Of Inter Partes Reviews, Jonathan Stroud
American University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Expert Prevalence, Persuasion And Price: What Trial Participants Really Think About Experts, Andrew W. Jurs
Expert Prevalence, Persuasion And Price: What Trial Participants Really Think About Experts, Andrew W. Jurs
Indiana Law Journal
By measuring how expert witnesses are actually used in court, this study offers important new data about what makes expert effective and suggests that some commonly held beliefs about experts are misguided. In doing so, the data establishes an important new baseline for measuring expert witnesses in court, updating and expanding on prior research in the field.
Judge Shopping In The Eastern District Of Texas, Jonas Anderson
Judge Shopping In The Eastern District Of Texas, Jonas Anderson
Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals
Judge Rodney Gilstrap has a lot of patent cases on his docket. In fact, in 2015 there were 1,686 patent cases that were filed and assigned to Judge Gilstrap, an astronomical number for a single judge. Judge Gilstrap — one of eight federal judges who sit on the Eastern District of Texas — is so popular with patent plaintiffs that over one-fourth of all patent cases in the country are heard by him. This Article addresses the problems with allowing this judge shopping to occur. It reviews the scholarship on the topic that is almost universally opposed to judge shopping …
Improving Predictability And Consistency In Class Action Tolling, Tanya Pierce
Improving Predictability And Consistency In Class Action Tolling, Tanya Pierce
Faculty Scholarship
Class action tolling means that when parties in a suit allege federal treatment, the individual claims of putative class members are tolled federal courts while the class action is pending. Commonly referred to as American Pipe tolling, this rule prevents duplicative litigation that would result if plaintiffs were required to intervene or file independent lawsuits to protect their interests while the class action was pending. Federal courts have long settled the application of American Pipe tolling in scenarios involving later-filed individual actions. In other scenarios, however, the application of American Pipe tolling has caused considerable uncertainty. This Article examines the …
Colorado Rule Of Evidence 502: Preserving Privilege And Work Product Protection In Discovery, Christopher B. Mueller, Ronald J. Hedges, Lino S. Lipinsky
Colorado Rule Of Evidence 502: Preserving Privilege And Work Product Protection In Discovery, Christopher B. Mueller, Ronald J. Hedges, Lino S. Lipinsky
Publications
No abstract provided.
The Customer's Nonwaivable Right To Choose Arbitration In The Securities Industry, Jill I. Gross
The Customer's Nonwaivable Right To Choose Arbitration In The Securities Industry, Jill I. Gross
Brooklyn Journal of Corporate, Financial & Commercial Law
Arbitration has been the predominant form of dispute resolution in the securities industry since the 1980s. Virtually all brokerage firms include predispute arbitration agreements (PDAAs) in their retail customer contracts, and have successfully fought off challenges to their validity. Additionally, the industry has long mandated that firms submit to arbitration at the demand of a customer, even in the absence of a PDAA.
More recently, however, brokerage firms have been arguing that forum selection clauses in their agreements with sophisticated customers (such as institutional investors and issuers) supersede firms’ duty to arbitrate under FINRA Rule 12200. Circuit courts currently are …
The Sixth Pillar Of Anti-Money Laundering Compliance: Balancing Effective Enforcement With Financial Privacy, Maria A. De Dios
The Sixth Pillar Of Anti-Money Laundering Compliance: Balancing Effective Enforcement With Financial Privacy, Maria A. De Dios
Brooklyn Journal of Corporate, Financial & Commercial Law
The U.S. government has responded to the increase of financial crimes, including money laundering and terrorist financing, by requiring that financial institutions implement anti-money laundering compliance programs within their institutions. Most recently, the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network exercised its regulatory powers, as authorized by the Treasury Department, by proposing regulations that now explicitly add customer due diligence to the preexisting anti-money laundering regime. The policy behind the government’s legislative and regulatory measures is clear—financial institutions must ensure that they are protected from and not aiding in the illegal efforts of criminals. The complexity and insidiousness of these financial crimes makes …
Will Work For Free: The Legality Of Unpaid Internships, Nicole M. Klinger
Will Work For Free: The Legality Of Unpaid Internships, Nicole M. Klinger
Brooklyn Journal of Corporate, Financial & Commercial Law
This Note addresses the current ambiguity in the law regarding if unpaid interns are employees under the Fair Labor Standards Act. The Note explores relevant case law throughout the circuit courts, but primarily focuses on the Second Circuit’s recent decision in Glatt v. Fox Searchlight Pictures. It argues that the primary benefits test created by the Second Circuit in Glatt does not adequately protect unpaid interns nor does it inform employers of the standards they need to meet in order to adopt legal unpaid internship programs. Instead, courts should adopt a clearer, more rigid test that finds an intern not …
Countering The Plaintiff’S Anchor: Jury Simulations To Evaluate Damages Arguments, John Campbell, Bernard Chao, Christopher Robertson, David Yokum
Countering The Plaintiff’S Anchor: Jury Simulations To Evaluate Damages Arguments, John Campbell, Bernard Chao, Christopher Robertson, David Yokum
Sturm College of Law: Faculty Scholarship
Numerous studies have shown that the amount of a juror's damages decision is strongly affected by the number suggested by the plaintiffs attorney, independent of the strength of the actual evidence (a psychological effect known as "anchoring"). For scholars and policymakers, this behavior is worrisome for the legitimacy and accuracy of jury decisions, especially in the domain of non-economic damages (e.g., pain and suffering). One noted paper even concluded that "the more you ask for, the more you get. " Others believe that the damage demand must pass the "straight-face" test because outlandishly high demands will diminish credibility and risk …
The Jury Trial In Antitrust Cases: An Anachronism?, Edward D. Cavanagh
The Jury Trial In Antitrust Cases: An Anachronism?, Edward D. Cavanagh
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Chilling Effects: Online Surveillance And Wikipedia Use, Jonathon Penney
Chilling Effects: Online Surveillance And Wikipedia Use, Jonathon Penney
Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press
This article discusses the results of the first empirical study providing evidence of regulatory “chilling effects” of Wikipedia users associated with online government surveillance. The study explores how traffic to Wikipedia articles on topics that raise privacy concerns for Wikipedia users decreased after the widespread publicity about NSA/PRISM surveillance revelations in June 2013. Using an interdisciplinary research design, the study tests the hypothesis, based on chilling effects theory, that traffic to privacy-sensitive Wikipedia articles reduced after the mass surveillance revelations. The Article finds not only a statistically significant immediate decline in traffic for these Wikipedia articles after June 2013, but …
The New Governance And The Challenge Of Litigation Bylaws, Jill E. Fisch
The New Governance And The Challenge Of Litigation Bylaws, Jill E. Fisch
All Faculty Scholarship
Corporate governance mechanisms designed to ensure that managers act in shareholders’ interest have evolved dramatically over the past forty years. “Old governance” mechanisms such as independent directors and performance-based executive compensation have been supplemented by innovations that give shareholders greater input into both the selection of directors and ongoing operational decisions. Issuer boards have responded with tools to limit the exercise of shareholder power both procedurally and substantively. This article terms the adoption and use of these tools, which generally take the form of structural provisions in the corporate charter or bylaws, the “new governance.”
Delaware law has largely taken …
Everything’S Bigger In Texas: Except The Medmal Settlements, Tom Baker, Eric Helland, Jonathan Klick
Everything’S Bigger In Texas: Except The Medmal Settlements, Tom Baker, Eric Helland, Jonathan Klick
All Faculty Scholarship
Recent work using Texas closed claim data finds that physicians are rarely required to use personal assets in medical malpractice settlements even when plaintiffs secure judgments above the physician's insurance limits. In equilibrium, this should lead physicians to purchase less insurance. Qualitative research on the behavior of plaintiffs suggests that there is a norm under which plaintiffs agree not to pursue personal assets as long as defendants are not grossly underinsured. This norm operates as a soft constraint on physicians. All other things equal, while physicians want to lower their coverage, they do not want to violate the norm and …
Spokeo, Inc. V. Robins: The Illusory “No-Injury Class” Reaches The Supreme Court, Patricia W. Moore
Spokeo, Inc. V. Robins: The Illusory “No-Injury Class” Reaches The Supreme Court, Patricia W. Moore
Faculty Articles
The Supreme Court’s grant of certiorari in Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins and three other cases involving class actions in the October 2015 term could be a bad sign for those who think the class action should remain a viable species of private regulation. The grant of certiorari in Spokeo is also a bad sign for those who think Congress should be able to enact statutes regulating businesses’ behavior for the public good—the petitioner, Spokeo, and its army of business amici are urging the Court to cut the legs out from under many such statutes.
Corporate litigation activists such as the …
Labor And Employment Law At The 2014-2015 Supreme Court: The Court Devotes Ten Percent Of Its Docket To Statutory Interpretation In Employment Cases, But Rejects The Argument That What Employment Law Really Needs Is More Administrative Law, Scott A. Moss
Publications
No abstract provided.
Appraisal: Shareholder Remedy Or Litigation Arbitrage?, Randall S. Thomas, Wei Jiang, Tao Li, Danqing Mei
Appraisal: Shareholder Remedy Or Litigation Arbitrage?, Randall S. Thomas, Wei Jiang, Tao Li, Danqing Mei
Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications
We present the first large-sample empirical study of the recent trends in the ap- praisal remedy-the right of shareholders of companies completing an eligible merger to petition the court for an improved price for their shares. Appraisal petitions have increased markedly over our sample from 2000 to 2014, and the composition of those bringing these suits has shifted from individual sharehold- ers toward specialized hedge funds. Appraisal petitions are more likely to be filed against mergers with perceived conflicts of interest, including going-private deals, minority squeeze outs, and acquisitions with low premiums, which makes them a potentially important governance mechanism. …
Back To Basics: Public Adjudication Of Corporate Atrocities Torts, Maya Steinitz
Back To Basics: Public Adjudication Of Corporate Atrocities Torts, Maya Steinitz
Faculty Scholarship
The editors of this online symposium invited me to contribute to the subject of an argument I have recently advanced. This argument is that the world needs a permanent International Court of Civil Justice (ICCJ) to adjudicate cross-border mass torts. A common reaction to this proposal has been to suggest that the function of such an international court be assumed by one of the existing arbitration institutions or filled by a new one. I’d like to take this opportunity to argue against that idea.
Corporate atrocities, which are the symposium’s focus, may be crimes, but they also have a tort …
International Litigation, Aaron Marr Page, Jonathan I. Blackman, Carmine D. Boccuzzi, Erin Lawrence, Phillip B. Dye Jr., Matthew D. Slater, Howard Zelbo, Charles A. Patrizia, Joseph R. Profaizer, Igor V. Timofeyev
International Litigation, Aaron Marr Page, Jonathan I. Blackman, Carmine D. Boccuzzi, Erin Lawrence, Phillip B. Dye Jr., Matthew D. Slater, Howard Zelbo, Charles A. Patrizia, Joseph R. Profaizer, Igor V. Timofeyev
The International Lawyer
No abstract provided.
Warger V. Shauers: Tanner 2.0 And The Need For A Less Restrictive Interpretation Of Federal Rule Of Evidence 606(B) And Its Exceptions, David K. Kouroyen Jr.
Warger V. Shauers: Tanner 2.0 And The Need For A Less Restrictive Interpretation Of Federal Rule Of Evidence 606(B) And Its Exceptions, David K. Kouroyen Jr.
Suffolk Journal of Trial and Appellate Advocacy
No abstract provided.
Family Law- Letting Go And Stopping The Continuous Cycle Of Litigation: Massachusetts Supreme Judicial And Limited Non-Binding Parent Coordinator Authority In Custody Cases Of Minor Children - Bower V. Bournay-Bower 15 N.E.3d 745 (Mass. 2014), Kimberly T. Aquino
Suffolk Journal of Trial and Appellate Advocacy
No abstract provided.
Preserving The Integrity Of The Arbitration Process: Requiring The Full And Fair Application Of The Claim Preclusion Doctrine, Tiffany J. Johnson
Preserving The Integrity Of The Arbitration Process: Requiring The Full And Fair Application Of The Claim Preclusion Doctrine, Tiffany J. Johnson
Suffolk Journal of Trial and Appellate Advocacy
No abstract provided.
Public Interest Over Private Prejudice? The Public Interest Exception To The Defense Of Laches And The Fourth Circuit's Clean Slate, Christopher A. Mull
Public Interest Over Private Prejudice? The Public Interest Exception To The Defense Of Laches And The Fourth Circuit's Clean Slate, Christopher A. Mull
Brooklyn Law Review
The trademark cancellation petitions and subsequent appeals surrounding the Washington Redskins’ allegedly disparaging trademarks lay useful groundwork in determining the applicability of the equitable defense of laches in the face of a purported greater public interest. The Lanham Act gives individuals the power to petition to cancel federally registered marks that may be disparaging to a group of individuals, while also permitting trademark holders to assert the equitable defense of laches in the event of unreasonable delay and consequential prejudice. In Pro-Football, Inc. v. Harjo, the District Court for the District of Columbia and the D.C. Circuit held that …
Corporate Darwinism: Disciplining Managers In A World With Weak Shareholder Litigation, James D. Cox, Randall S. Thomas
Corporate Darwinism: Disciplining Managers In A World With Weak Shareholder Litigation, James D. Cox, Randall S. Thomas
Faculty Scholarship
Because representative shareholder litigation has been constrained by numerous legal developments, the corporate governance system has developed new mechanisms as alternative means to address managerial agency costs. We posit that recent significant governance developments in the corporate world are the natural consequence of the ineffectiveness and inefficiency of shareholder suits to address certain genre of managerial agency costs. We thus argue that corporate governance responses evolve to fill voids caused by the inability of shareholder suits to monitor and discipline corporate managers.
We further claim that these new governance responses are themselves becoming stronger due in part to the rising …
The Law And Economics Of Proportionality In Discovery, Jonah B. Gelbach, Bruce H. Kobayashi
The Law And Economics Of Proportionality In Discovery, Jonah B. Gelbach, Bruce H. Kobayashi
All Faculty Scholarship
This paper analyzes the proportionality standard in discovery. Many believe the Advisory Committee's renewed emphasis on this standard has the potential to infuse litigation practice with considerably more attention to questions related to the costs and benefits of discovery. We discuss the history and rationale of proportionality's inclusion in Rule 26, adopting an analytical framework that focuses on how costs and benefits can diverge in litigation generally, and discovery in particular. Finally, we use this framework to understand the mechanics and challenges involved in deploying the six factors included in the proportionality standard. Throughout, we emphasize that the proportionality standard …
Rules, Standards, Sentencing, And The Nature Of Law, Russell D. Covey
Rules, Standards, Sentencing, And The Nature Of Law, Russell D. Covey
Faculty Publications By Year
Sentencing law and practice in the United States can be characterized as an argument about rules and standards. Whereas in the decades prior to the 1980s when sentencing was largely a discretionary activity governed only by broad sentencing standards, a sentencing reform movement in the 1980s transformed sentencing practice through the advent of sentencing guidelines and mandatory minimum provisions. As a result, sentencing became far less standard-like and far more rule-like. Although reform proponents believed that this "rulification" of sentencing would reduce unwarranted sentencing disparities and enhance justice, it is far from clear that these goals were achieved. Indeed, the …
The Questionable Origins Of The Copyright Infringement Analysis, Shyamkrishna Balganesh
The Questionable Origins Of The Copyright Infringement Analysis, Shyamkrishna Balganesh
All Faculty Scholarship
Central to modern copyright law is its test for determining infringement, famously developed by Judge Jerome Frank in the landmark case of Arnstein v. Porter. The “Arnstein test,” which courts continue to apply, demands that the analysis be divided into two components, actual copying — the question whether the defendant did in fact copy, and improper appropriation — the question whether such copying, if it did exist, was unlawful. Somewhat counter-intuitively though, the test treats both components as pure questions of fact, requiring that even the question of improper appropriation go to a jury. This jury-centric approach continues to influence …
Discouraging Frivolous Copyright Infringement Claims: Fee Shifting Under Rule 11 Or 28 U.S.C. § 1927 As An Alternative To Awarding Attorney's Fees Under Section 505 Of The Copyright Act, David E. Shipley
Scholarly Works
The United States Supreme Court’s 2016 decision in Kirtsaeng v. John Wiley & Sons resolved a disagreement over when it is appropriate to award attorney’s fees to a prevailing defendant under section 505 of the Copyright Act, and ended a perceived venue advantage for losing plaintiffs in some jurisdictions. The Court ruled unanimously that courts are correct to give substantial weight to the question of whether the losing side had a reasonable case to fight, but that the objective reasonableness of that side’s position does not give rise to a presumption against fee shifting. It made clear that other factors …
Material Facts In The Debate Over Twombly And Iqbal, Jonah B. Gelbach
Material Facts In The Debate Over Twombly And Iqbal, Jonah B. Gelbach
All Faculty Scholarship
This paper presents empirical evidence concerning the adjudication of defendant-filed summary judgment motions from nearly 2,000 randomly selected employment discrimination and contracts cases to try to assess Twombly and Iqbal’s performance in filtering cases according to merit. I first explain how such data might be helpful in such an assessment, taking into account the possibility that parties’ behavior might have changed following Twombly and Iqbal.
I then report results indicating that even using this large collection of data -- the most comprehensive data assembled to date to address this question -- we cannot tell whether “TwIqbal” …
Foreign Governments As Plaintiffs In U.S. Courts And The Case Against "Judicial Imperialism", Hannah L. Buxbaum
Foreign Governments As Plaintiffs In U.S. Courts And The Case Against "Judicial Imperialism", Hannah L. Buxbaum
Articles by Maurer Faculty
One consequence of the increasingly transnational nature of civil litigation is that U.S. courts must frequently address the interests of foreign sovereigns. These interactions arise primarily in three contexts: when a foreign government is the defendant in a U.S. court; when a claim requires a U.S. court to scrutinize actions taken by a foreign government; and when a U.S. court seeks to apply U.S. law to persons or conduct within a foreign government’s borders. Each of these contexts invokes a narrative in which the engagement of U.S. courts interferes or conflicts with the prerogatives of a foreign sovereign. As a …