Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
Articles 151 - 162 of 162
Full-Text Articles in Law
Georgia's Witness Immunity Statute: Explication And Recommendations For Judicial Development, Roald Mykkeltvedt
Georgia's Witness Immunity Statute: Explication And Recommendations For Judicial Development, Roald Mykkeltvedt
Mercer Law Review
In 1975 the Georgia General Assembly enacted a comprehensive witness immunity statute' providing for a procedure to obtain the testimony of persons who refuse to testify on self-incrimination grounds. That procedure is summarized in the following excerpt from the act:
Whenever in the judgment of the Attorney General or any district attorney, the testimony of any person or the production of evidence of any kind by any person in any criminal proceeding before a court or grand jury is necessary to the public interest, then the Attorney General or the district attorney may request the superior court, in writing, to …
Practice And Procedure, R. Neal Batson, Ben F. Johnson Iii
Practice And Procedure, R. Neal Batson, Ben F. Johnson Iii
Mercer Law Review
This article opened last year with a discussion of McGovern v. American Airlines, Inc. and the principle that it is the plaintiff's burden to allege and invoke federal jurisdiction. McGovern was undercut somewhat by the 1976 case of Skidmore v. Syntex Laboratories, Inc. Indeed, one dissenting judge argued that the Fifth Circuit was permitting jurisdiction even though the plaintiff had failed to make even a prima facie showing of essential jurisdictional facts. The plaintiff, a Texas citizen, brought a products-liability diversity action against one Delaware corporation and one Panamanian corporation. The plaintiff, even after substantial discovery, was unable to demonstrate …
Expert Witnesses And The Federal Rules Of Evidence, James W. Mcelhaney
Expert Witnesses And The Federal Rules Of Evidence, James W. Mcelhaney
Mercer Law Review
Brainerd Currie was already a legend when he came to Duke from the University of Chicago. I was a third-year law student then and took his course in Conflicts in the spring of 1962—a dazzling intellectual display centered around the hard practicalities of complex litigation. But Currie was more than just a great teacher and scholar. Too busy to take a vacation ("How can you talk about taking a trip to Europe, McElhaney? I'm too busy to go to Europe, and you're going to be practicing. "), he had time to talk with us after class; to drink a cup …
Appellate Practice And Procedure, Tommy Day Wilcox
Appellate Practice And Procedure, Tommy Day Wilcox
Mercer Law Review
There were a number of significant cases decided by the appellate courts of Georgia during the past survey year in the area of appellate practice and procedure. The Georgia Supreme Court and the Georgia Court of Appeals handed down more than sixty opinions that turned in part on a consideration of the Appellate Practice Act of 1965, the rules of the appellate benches, and the case law which has evolved under these standards. The most noteworthy of these cases will be highlighted here under four general headings: Enumeration of Errors; Payment of Costs and Transcripts; Final Judgments; and Miscellany.
Unlike …
Trial Practice And Procedure, J. Ralph Beaird, C. Ronald Ellington
Trial Practice And Procedure, J. Ralph Beaird, C. Ronald Ellington
Mercer Law Review
Each year the Georgia appellate courts decide several hundred cases that raise issues of trial practice and procedure. The period surveyed in this article covers the tenth year of cases interpreting the Long-Arm Statute and the ninth year of cases decided under the Civil Practice Act. The gradual judicial development of these important laws has been fascinating to watch and comment on. A steady improvement in both the quality and predictability of these decisions can be observed and should be applauded.
The cases selected for comment herein are those deemed the most significant because they either indicate a new direction …
A Party Need Not Show Prejudice Or Surprise To Impeach Its Own Witness, Robert R. Gunn Ii
A Party Need Not Show Prejudice Or Surprise To Impeach Its Own Witness, Robert R. Gunn Ii
Mercer Law Review
In Wilson v. State, the Supreme Court of Georgia unanimously held that a party may impeach the credibility of its own witness with that witness' prior inconsistent statement without showing that the testimony is a total surprise or affirmatively damaging to the party's case.
Bill Ray Wilson was convicted of murder and armed robbery on the basis of testimony from three prosecution witnesses. His case consisted solely of his sworn denial. The testimony of one prosecution witness was inconsistent with a previous written, sworn statement in which the witness had said Wilson had confessed to the murder in his …
Practice And Procedure, R. Neal Batson, Ben F. Johnson Iii
Practice And Procedure, R. Neal Batson, Ben F. Johnson Iii
Mercer Law Review
No abstract provided.
Trial Practice And Procedure, J. Ralph Beaird, C. Ronald Ellington
Trial Practice And Procedure, J. Ralph Beaird, C. Ronald Ellington
Mercer Law Review
No abstract provided.
A Glance At Summary Judgment, Thomas J. Browning
A Glance At Summary Judgment, Thomas J. Browning
Mercer Law Review
EDITOR'S NOTE: A motion for summary judgment is one of the most frequently used pre-trial motions. The following article was written as a quick-reference index for the Judges of the Cobb Superior Court in ruling on these motions. In keeping with our policy of presenting articles to aid the practicing attorney, as well as the academician, we are including the article in this year's Survey. This is the authority practicing attorneys will no doubt face from the Georgia judiciary on a motion for summary judgment.
I. PURPOSE
Purpose of Summary Judgment: A primary purpose of the summary judgment procedure is …
Pattern Jury Instructions, Luther C. Hames Jr.
Pattern Jury Instructions, Luther C. Hames Jr.
Mercer Law Review
No abstract provided.
Damages, Edgar Hunter Wilson
Damages, Edgar Hunter Wilson
Mercer Law Review
The damage problems presented to the appellate courts of Georgia during the sufvey period have been few. The cases, however, are well-dispersed over the field of damages.
Practice And Procedure, Wiley H. Davis
Practice And Procedure, Wiley H. Davis
Mercer Law Review
It has long been recognized that a large percentage of the cases decided by the appellate courts of Georgia are decided in whole or in part upon procedural points. Because of this fact, any attempt to survey the matters decided on such points during any twelve-month period must include reference to many cases, however brief the treatment. In making such a survey, one frequently faces the problem of deciding whether a holding is based primarily upon procedure or whether the case should be considered substantive in nature. Of course, some procedure is involved in the hearing, trial or appeal of …