Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- University of Colorado Law School (14)
- Suffolk University (13)
- University of Michigan Law School (12)
- Brigham Young University Law School (10)
- Cornell University Law School (10)
-
- UIC School of Law (6)
- American University Washington College of Law (4)
- The University of Akron (4)
- Mercer University School of Law (3)
- University of San Diego (3)
- Selected Works (2)
- University of Kentucky (2)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (2)
- Florida State University College of Law (1)
- Georgetown University Law Center (1)
- Georgia State University College of Law (1)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (1)
- North Carolina Central University School of Law (1)
- Notre Dame Law School (1)
- Southern Methodist University (1)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (1)
- University at Buffalo School of Law (1)
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock William H. Bowen School of Law (1)
- University of Georgia School of Law (1)
- University of Massachusetts School of Law (1)
- University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School (1)
- University of Tulsa College of Law (1)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (1)
- Wayne State University (1)
- Keyword
-
- Litigation (6)
- Law reform (5)
- Adequacy (4)
- Equality (4)
- Equity (4)
-
- Funding (4)
- Public schools (4)
- School districts (4)
- School finance (4)
- United States (4)
- West (4)
- Central Arizona Project (3)
- Dams (3)
- Education reform (3)
- Endangered Species Act (3)
- Evidence (3)
- Federal Rules of Evidence (3)
- Federal courts (3)
- Lawyers (3)
- Proposition 187 (3)
- United States Supreme Court (3)
- Washington (3)
- Adequacy theory (2)
- Antitrust (2)
- Batson v. Kentucky (2)
- CAP (2)
- California (2)
- California Courts of Appeal (2)
- California Supreme Court (2)
- Civil Procedure/Evidence (2)
- Publication
-
- Suffolk Journal of Trial and Appellate Advocacy (13)
- Sustainable Use of the West's Water (Summer Conference, June 12-14) (12)
- BYU Law Review (10)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (10)
- UIC Law Review (6)
-
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (5)
- Michigan Law Review (4)
- Articles (3)
- California Regulatory Law Reporter (3)
- Mercer Law Review (3)
- Scholarly Works (3)
- Akron Law Faculty Publications (2)
- American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law (2)
- American University Law Review (2)
- Law Faculty Scholarly Articles (2)
- Publications (2)
- Robert L Tucker (2)
- All Faculty Scholarship (1)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (1)
- Articles, Chapters in Books and Other Contributions to Scholarly Works (1)
- Buffalo Law Review (1)
- Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters (1)
- Faculty Publications (1)
- Faculty Publications By Year (1)
- Florida State University Law Review (1)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (1)
- Journal Articles (1)
- LLM Theses and Essays (1)
- Law Faculty Research Publications (1)
- North Carolina Central Law Review (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 91 - 101 of 101
Full-Text Articles in Law
Attorney-Client And Work Product Protection In A Utilitarian World: An Argument For Recomparison, Catherine T. Struve
Attorney-Client And Work Product Protection In A Utilitarian World: An Argument For Recomparison, Catherine T. Struve
All Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
The Adverse Testimony Privilege, Inalienable Entitlements, And The "Internal Stance": A Response To Professor Regan, Susan H. Williams
The Adverse Testimony Privilege, Inalienable Entitlements, And The "Internal Stance": A Response To Professor Regan, Susan H. Williams
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
Interpreting Insurance Policies, Jeffrey W. Stempel
Interpreting Insurance Policies, Jeffrey W. Stempel
Scholarly Works
Like any other contract, an insurance policy may become the subject of a legal dispute. When disputes arise over insurance coverage, lawyers must combine their skill in contract interpretation with their knowledge of insurance law, bringing both to bear on the special problems related to this type of contract. Each dispute has unique traits, but a few basic ground rules of contract law and insurance law can help you interpret insurance policies and resolve disputes over insurance coverage.
The Romance Of Revenge: An Alternative History Of Jeffrey Dahmer's Trial, Samuel R. Gross
The Romance Of Revenge: An Alternative History Of Jeffrey Dahmer's Trial, Samuel R. Gross
Articles
On Feb. 17, 1992, Jeffrey Dahmer was sentenced to fifteen consecutive terms of life imprisonment for killing and dismembering fifteen young men and boys. Dahmer had been arrested six months earlier, on July 22, 1991. On Jan. 13 he pled guilty to the fifteen murder counts against him, leaving open only the issue of his sanity. Jury selection began two weeks later, and the trial proper started on Jan. 30. The jury heard two weeks of horrifying testimony about murder, mutilation and necrophilia; they deliberated for five hours before finding that Dahmer was sane when he committed thos crimes. After …
Asymmetrical Peremptories Defended: A Reply, Richard D. Friedman
Asymmetrical Peremptories Defended: A Reply, Richard D. Friedman
Articles
Three years ago, with the publication of his article ''An Asymmetrical Approach to the Problem of Peremptories" in this journal, Professor Friedman initiated a debate on the subject that was taken up in 1994 by three prosecutors who offered a rebuttal that was also printed in these pages. Professor Friedman continues the debate.
Foreword, J. Dennis Hynes
What's Quality Got To Do With It?: Constitutional Theory, Politics, And Education Reform, Phil Weiser
What's Quality Got To Do With It?: Constitutional Theory, Politics, And Education Reform, Phil Weiser
Publications
No abstract provided.
Are Litigating Attorneys Debt Collectors Under The Federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act?, Tang Thi Thanh Trai Le
Are Litigating Attorneys Debt Collectors Under The Federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act?, Tang Thi Thanh Trai Le
Journal Articles
In 1986 Congress amended the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act to include attorneys under the definition of debt collector. Now the Supreme Court is asked to determine if the law applies to attorneys suing debtors on behalf of clients, not just when they conduct debt-collection activities.
If the Supreme Court affirms the decision of the Seventh Circuit, thus finding for Jenkins, attorneys who litigate cases involving collection of debts may find themselves subject to liability for communications with the consumer or the consumer's attorney regarding the litigation. Furthermore, these attorneys would face personal liability for any violations of the Act …
Intellectual Coherence In An Evidence Code, Paul F. Rothstein
Intellectual Coherence In An Evidence Code, Paul F. Rothstein
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
The Federal Rules of Evidence (Federal Rules or Rules) were created in large part to promote uniformity and predictability in federal trials by providing a relatively instructive guide for judges and lawyers concerning the admissibility of evidence. As with any codification, success in this respect requires, among other things, that there be a considerable degree of intellectual coherence among the code's various provisions. The Federal Rules fall short of intellectual coherence in a number of areas. They contain contradictory and inconsistent mandates that do not make theoretical sense and therefore accord the trial judge almost unlimited discretion in these areas. …
Practiced Moral Activism, Paul R. Tremblay
Mismanagement And Misinterpretation: U.S. Judicial Implementation Of The Warsaw Convention In Air Disaster Litigation, Perry S. Bechky
Mismanagement And Misinterpretation: U.S. Judicial Implementation Of The Warsaw Convention In Air Disaster Litigation, Perry S. Bechky
Perry S. Bechky
This article explores the implementation of the Warsaw Convention in international air disaster lawsuits in U.S. courts, including their approach to mass tort management and treaty interpretation. Specifically, the article evaluates the Warsaw Convention cases according to the rules of treaty interpretation codified in the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties and a test for mass tort management developed by Judge Jack Weinstein.