Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- University of Georgia School of Law (51)
- University of the Pacific (29)
- Brooklyn Law School (27)
- University of Michigan Law School (25)
- Fordham Law School (22)
-
- Notre Dame Law School (21)
- Georgia State University College of Law (13)
- DePaul University (11)
- University of Richmond (11)
- Seattle University School of Law (10)
- St. John's University School of Law (10)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (8)
- Pepperdine University (5)
- Louisiana State University Law Center (3)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (3)
- The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law (3)
- University of the District of Columbia School of Law (3)
- Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School (2)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (2)
- Mitchell Hamline School of Law (2)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (2)
- Universitas Indonesia (2)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (2)
- American University Washington College of Law (1)
- Barry University School of Law (1)
- Chicago-Kent College of Law (1)
- Florida State University College of Law (1)
- The University of Akron (1)
- University of Montana (1)
- University of Rhode Island (1)
- Keyword
-
- Legislation (21)
- Congress (14)
- Georgia State University College of Law (13)
- Peach Sheet (13)
- Law reform (9)
-
- Statutory interpretation (9)
- Supreme Court (9)
- Discrimination (8)
- Education (7)
- ICJ (7)
- Constitution (6)
- Court (6)
- International Court of Justice (6)
- United States Supreme Court (6)
- Authority (5)
- Race (5)
- Supreme court (5)
- UN Charter (5)
- United States (5)
- Civil procedure (4)
- Copyright (4)
- Federal Trade Commission (4)
- Federal courts (4)
- Government (4)
- Human trafficking (4)
- Litigation (4)
- Local (4)
- SEC (4)
- Section 1983 (4)
- Securities and Exchange Commission (4)
- Publication
-
- Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law (43)
- Fordham Urban Law Journal (22)
- California Initiative Review (CIR) (18)
- Journal of Legislation (17)
- Georgia State University Law Review (13)
-
- DePaul Journal for Social Justice (11)
- University of Richmond Law Review (11)
- University of the Pacific Law Review (11)
- Brooklyn Journal of Corporate, Financial & Commercial Law (10)
- The Catholic Lawyer (10)
- Journal of Law and Policy (9)
- Seattle Journal for Social Justice (8)
- Touro Law Review (8)
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law (7)
- Michigan Law Review (7)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (7)
- Brooklyn Law Review (5)
- Brooklyn Journal of International Law (3)
- Canadian Journal of Law and Technology (3)
- Louisiana Law Review (3)
- University of the District of Columbia Law Review (3)
- Catholic University Law Review (2)
- Global Tides (2)
- Indiana Law Journal (2)
- Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan (2)
- Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review (2)
- Michigan Journal of Environmental & Administrative Law (2)
- Michigan Journal of International Law (2)
- Michigan Journal of Race and Law (2)
- Michigan Telecommunications & Technology Law Review (2)
Articles 271 - 276 of 276
Full-Text Articles in Law
Ab 1301: An Attempt To Eliminate Persistent Voter Discrimination, Brian Russ
Ab 1301: An Attempt To Eliminate Persistent Voter Discrimination, Brian Russ
University of the Pacific Law Review
No abstract provided.
Another Bite At The Apple For Trade Secret Protection: Why Stronger Federal Laws Are Needed To Protect A Corporation's Most Valuable Property, Alissa Cardillo
Another Bite At The Apple For Trade Secret Protection: Why Stronger Federal Laws Are Needed To Protect A Corporation's Most Valuable Property, Alissa Cardillo
Brooklyn Journal of Corporate, Financial & Commercial Law
Trade secrets are one of a corporation’s most valuable assets. However, they lack adequate protection under federal law, leaving them vulnerable to theft and misappropriation. As technology advances, it becomes easier and less time consuming for individuals and entities to access and steal trade secrets to a corporation’s detriment. Most often these thefts involve stealing trade secrets in an intangible form. Current legislation fails to adequately protect intangible trade secrets, leaving them vulnerable to theft. An amendment to the National Stolen Property Act that encompasses intangible trade secrets would close a loophole that currently exists relating to intangible assets, allowing …
Human Trafficking In Southeast Asia: Uncovering The Dynamics Of State Commitment And Compliance, Catherine Renshaw
Human Trafficking In Southeast Asia: Uncovering The Dynamics Of State Commitment And Compliance, Catherine Renshaw
Michigan Journal of International Law
In Part I of this Article, Renshaw explains some of the current theories about how and why states come to adopt human rights norms and then translates these norms into laws and policies. In Part II, she sets out the contours of the TVPA and the global regime with which it coexists, the United Nations Palermo Protocol. Part III considers how ASEAN States have responded to the global anti-trafficking regime. Part IV explores how ASEAN states perceive the issue of human trafficking. Part V describes how ASEAN states have responded to the threat of sanctions under the TVPA. Part VI …
Congress And The Reconstruction Of Foreign Affairs Federalism, Ryan Baasch, Saikrishna Bangalore Prakash
Congress And The Reconstruction Of Foreign Affairs Federalism, Ryan Baasch, Saikrishna Bangalore Prakash
Michigan Law Review
Though the Constitution conspicuously bars some state involvement in foreign affairs, the states clearly retain some authority in foreign affairs. Correctly supposing that state participation may unnecessarily complicate or embarrass our nation’s foreign relations, the Supreme Court has embraced aggressive preemption doctrines that sporadically oust the states from discrete areas in foreign affairs. These doctrines are unprincipled, supply little guidance, and generate capricious results. Fortunately, there is a better way. While the Constitution permits the states a limited and continuing role, it never goes so far as guaranteeing them any foreign affairs authority. Furthermore, the Constitution authorizes Congress to enact …
Why Enumeration Matters, Richard A. Primus
Why Enumeration Matters, Richard A. Primus
Michigan Law Review
The maxim that the federal government is a government of enumerated powers can be understood as a “continuity tender”: not a principle with practical consequences for governance, but a ritual statement with which practitioners identify themselves with a history from which they descend. This interpretation makes sense of the longstanding paradox whereby courts recite the enumeration principle but give it virtually no practical effect. On this understanding, the enumerated-powers maxim is analogous to the clause that Parliament still uses to open enacted statutes: “Be it enacted by the Queen’s most Excellent Majesty.” That text might imply that the Queen is …
More Than Just A Potted Plant: A Court's Authority To Review Deferred Prosecution Agreements Under The Speedy Trial Act And Under Its Inherent Supervisory Power, Mary Miller
Michigan Law Review
In the last decade, the Department of Justice has increasingly relied on pretrial diversion agreements as a means of resolving corporate criminal cases short of prosecution. These pretrial diversion agreements—non-prosecution and deferred prosecution agreements—include substantive terms that a company must abide by for the duration of the agreement in order to avoid prosecution. When entering a deferred prosecution agreement, the Department of Justice files charges against the defendant corporation as well as an agreement outlining the variety of terms with which the company must comply. This delay in prosecution is permitted under the Speedy Trial Act, which provides an exception …