Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- University of Michigan Law School (1162)
- University at Buffalo School of Law (631)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (424)
- University of Colorado Law School (385)
- University of Kentucky (380)
-
- Seattle University School of Law (360)
- UIC School of Law (304)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (295)
- University of Georgia School of Law (276)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (232)
- American University Washington College of Law (216)
- University of Richmond (177)
- New York Law School (175)
- Cornell University Law School (173)
- William & Mary Law School (170)
- University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Law (169)
- Georgetown University Law Center (158)
- Notre Dame Law School (156)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (135)
- Pepperdine University (131)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (130)
- St. Mary's University (128)
- Universitas Indonesia (124)
- BLR (122)
- Columbia Law School (118)
- Fordham Law School (116)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (116)
- University of Arkansas Little Rock (114)
- Maurice A. Deane School of Law at Hofstra University (111)
- Duke Law (109)
- Keyword
-
- History (669)
- Legal history (555)
- Legal History (491)
- Constitution (276)
- Jurisprudence (249)
-
- Constitutional law (246)
- Law (204)
- Supreme Court (201)
- Constitutional Law (197)
- State government (163)
- United States Supreme Court (163)
- Representatives (162)
- Kentucky history (161)
- Senators (161)
- State legislature (161)
- Slavery (155)
- United States (123)
- Originalism (121)
- Courts (115)
- Judges (106)
- Race (104)
- Congress (102)
- England (100)
- Constitutional history (93)
- Law and Society (90)
- Legal education (87)
- Women (87)
- Federalism (86)
- Justice (85)
- Legislation (84)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Michigan Law Review (684)
- Faculty Scholarship (620)
- The Opinion Newspaper (all issues) (458)
- Journals of the General Assembly of the Commonwealth of Kentucky (310)
- Seattle University Law Review (308)
-
- Articles (302)
- UIC Law Review (253)
- Publications (252)
- Cardozo Law Review (224)
- Scholarly Works (202)
- Journal Articles (160)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (159)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (151)
- Law Faculty Publications (146)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (133)
- Faculty Publications (133)
- NYLS Law Review (122)
- "Dharmasisya” Jurnal Program Magister Hukum FHUI (121)
- ExpressO (118)
- Maryland Law Review (111)
- Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals (111)
- Faculty Works (105)
- Dalhousie Law Journal (95)
- Buffalo Law Review (92)
- The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process (86)
- Documents from Making Habeas Work: A Legal History (monograph) (83)
- Indiana Law Journal (77)
- Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present) (72)
- Pepperdine Law Review (72)
- All Faculty Scholarship (70)
- Publication Type
Articles 7501 - 7530 of 10051
Full-Text Articles in Law
Dworkin And The Legal Process Tradition: The Legacy Of Hart & Sacks, Vincent A. Wellman
Dworkin And The Legal Process Tradition: The Legacy Of Hart & Sacks, Vincent A. Wellman
Law Faculty Research Publications
No abstract provided.
Religion, Rights And Difference In The Early Woman's Rights Movement, Elizabeth B. Clark
Religion, Rights And Difference In The Early Woman's Rights Movement, Elizabeth B. Clark
Publications
The meeting of feminists at Seneca Falls in July of 1848 marked the nominal beginning of the movement which in the nineteenth century was labeled "woman's rights." For us that term has become commonly interchangeable with "suffrage," and we often assume that "woman's rights" describes a seventy-odd year campaign to gain civil and political power and protection from a government which -- although it had perpetrated outrages against women and blacks -- had an unquestioned legitimacy as the guarantor and enforcer of rights.
Punitive Damages In Arbitration, 21 J. Marshall L. Rev. 21 (1987), Stephen P. Bedell
Punitive Damages In Arbitration, 21 J. Marshall L. Rev. 21 (1987), Stephen P. Bedell
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Judicial Conscience And Natural Rights: A Reply To Professor Jaffa, Bruce Ledewitz
Judicial Conscience And Natural Rights: A Reply To Professor Jaffa, Bruce Ledewitz
Seattle University Law Review
This Article replies to Professor Harry V. Jaffa’s article “What Were the ‘Original Intentions’ of the Framers of the Constitution of the United States?” The Article focuses on the gap the author argues Professor Jaffa left between the consciousness of the Framers and the practice of judicial review today. The author argues that the understanding that Professor Jaffa brings to the intent of the Framers is one that opens up the Constitution to the call of justice, but the author critiques the utility of Professor Jaffa’s work in resolving the contentious constitutional issues of today, including abortion and capital punishment.
The Illegality Of The Constitution, Richard Kay
The Illegality Of The Constitution, Richard Kay
Faculty Articles and Papers
No abstract provided.
The Role Of The Supreme Court: Introduction By Whitman H. Ridgway, Whitman H. Ridgway
The Role Of The Supreme Court: Introduction By Whitman H. Ridgway, Whitman H. Ridgway
Maryland Law Review
No abstract provided.
Rowan: Response To Comments, Carl T. Rowan
The Right To Parenthood And The Best Interests Of The Child: A Perspective On Surrogate Motherhood In Jewish And Israeli Law, Pinhas Shifman
The Right To Parenthood And The Best Interests Of The Child: A Perspective On Surrogate Motherhood In Jewish And Israeli Law, Pinhas Shifman
NYLS Journal of Human Rights
No abstract provided.
Foreword: On Jaffa, Lincoln, Marshall, And Original Intent, Lewis E. Lehrman
Foreword: On Jaffa, Lincoln, Marshall, And Original Intent, Lewis E. Lehrman
Seattle University Law Review
This Foreword introduces the article to follow written by Harry V. Jaffa, scholar of Abraham Lincoln’s political philosophy. The Foreward provides background material necessary to contextualize the ongoing debate surrounding constitutional interpretation emphasizing original intent addressed in Jaffa's article.
Professor Harry V. Jaffa Divides The House: A Respectful Protest And A Defense Brief, Robert L. Stone
Professor Harry V. Jaffa Divides The House: A Respectful Protest And A Defense Brief, Robert L. Stone
Seattle University Law Review
This Article replies to Professor’ Jaffa’s article, “What Were the ‘Original Intentions’ of the Framers of the Constitution of the United States?,” and book, The Crisis of the House Divided. The Article argues that Professor Jaffa’s method throughout his indictment of legal scholars has three flaws. First, the Article argues that Professor Jaffa takes statements of sensible political compromises-such as support for judicial restraint, British traditions, and local self-government-and treats them as if they were philosophical statements. Second, the author contends that Professor Jaffa assembles a composite indictment, which in law is appropriately applied only to an indictment against …
After The Imperial Presidency: Introduction By Whitman H. Ridgway, Whitman H. Ridgway
After The Imperial Presidency: Introduction By Whitman H. Ridgway, Whitman H. Ridgway
Maryland Law Review
No abstract provided.
1986 Gerber Lecture: From Doctor Johnson To Justice Holmes To Professor Laski, Jeffrey O'Connell, Thomas E. O'Connell
1986 Gerber Lecture: From Doctor Johnson To Justice Holmes To Professor Laski, Jeffrey O'Connell, Thomas E. O'Connell
Maryland Law Review
No abstract provided.
Equality As A Constitutional Concept: Introduction By Whitman H. Ridgway, Whitman H. Ridgway
Equality As A Constitutional Concept: Introduction By Whitman H. Ridgway, Whitman H. Ridgway
Maryland Law Review
No abstract provided.
Equality As A Constitutional Concept, Carl T. Rowan
Equality As A Constitutional Concept, Carl T. Rowan
Maryland Law Review
No abstract provided.
Berns: Comment On Rowan, Walter Berns
Belz: Comment On Rowan, Herman Belz
Taylor: Comment On Rowan, William L. Taylor
Kennedy: Comment On Rowan, Randall Kennedy
The Constitution And Presidential Leadership, Arthur M. Schlesinger Jr.
The Constitution And Presidential Leadership, Arthur M. Schlesinger Jr.
Maryland Law Review
No abstract provided.
Kurland: Commen On Schlesinger, Philip B. Kurland
Kurland: Commen On Schlesinger, Philip B. Kurland
Maryland Law Review
No abstract provided.
Cooper: Comment On Schlesinger, Charles J. Cooper
Cooper: Comment On Schlesinger, Charles J. Cooper
Maryland Law Review
No abstract provided.
Greene: Comment On Schlesinger, Linda S. Greene
Greene: Comment On Schlesinger, Linda S. Greene
Maryland Law Review
No abstract provided.
Ceaser: Comment On Schlesinger, James W. Ceaser
Ceaser: Comment On Schlesinger, James W. Ceaser
Maryland Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Role Of The Supreme Court: Judicial Activism Or Self-Restraint?, Archibald Cox
The Role Of The Supreme Court: Judicial Activism Or Self-Restraint?, Archibald Cox
Maryland Law Review
No abstract provided.
Tushnet: Comment On Cox, Mark V. Tushnet
Millemann: Comment On Cox, Michael A. Millemann
Millemann: Comment On Cox, Michael A. Millemann
Maryland Law Review
No abstract provided.
Brubaker: Comment On Cox, Stanley C. Brubaker
Brubaker: Comment On Cox, Stanley C. Brubaker
Maryland Law Review
No abstract provided.
Cox: Response To Comments, Archibald Cox
Ordered Liberty: The Original Intent Of The Constitution, Charles Mcc. Mathias Jr.
Ordered Liberty: The Original Intent Of The Constitution, Charles Mcc. Mathias Jr.
Maryland Law Review
No abstract provided.
Fein: Comment On Mathias, Bruce E. Fein