Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Selected Works (12)
- University of San Diego (5)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (3)
- Georgetown University Law Center (2)
- American University Washington College of Law (1)
-
- Case Western Reserve University School of Law (1)
- Columbia Law School (1)
- Duke Law (1)
- Florida A&M University College of Law (1)
- Fordham Law School (1)
- Mitchell Hamline School of Law (1)
- Osgoode Hall Law School of York University (1)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (1)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (1)
- West Virginia University (1)
- Publication
-
- Faculty Scholarship (5)
- San Diego Law Review (5)
- Scholarly Works (4)
- Samuel J. Levine (3)
- Daniel R. Coquillette (2)
-
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (2)
- Judith A. McMorrow (2)
- Articles & Book Chapters (1)
- Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals (1)
- Faculty Publications (1)
- Journal Publications (1)
- Lawrence Raful (1)
- Mark Spiegel (1)
- Paul R. Tremblay (1)
- R. Michael Cassidy (1)
- Randy Lee (1)
- West Virginia Law Review (1)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 31 - 33 of 33
Full-Text Articles in Law
The Limits Of Process, Robin West
The Limits Of Process, Robin West
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
This article presents four major objections to Jeremy Waldron’s claim that for “Rule of Law” to exist it we must move beyond basic formal requirements that laws be general and knowable rules we can all comply with, towards substantive requirements that when the law imposes its censorial and punitive will upon us, it is applied in a way that acknowledges our intelligence and respects our individual dignity. After challenging Waldron’s claim, the author suggests that if Rule of Law theorizing is intended to capture our ideals of law, then the three paradigms of Rule of Law scholarship that Waldron has …
Plea Bargaining, Discovery, And The Intractable Problem Of Impeachment Disclosures, R. Michael Cassidy
Plea Bargaining, Discovery, And The Intractable Problem Of Impeachment Disclosures, R. Michael Cassidy
R. Michael Cassidy
In a criminal justice system where guilty pleas are the norm and trials the rare exception, the issue of how much discovery a defendant is entitled to before allocution has immense significance. This article examines the scope of a prosecutor’s obligation to disclose impeachment information before a guilty plea. This question has polarized the criminal bar and bedeviled the academic community since the Supreme Court’s controversial decision in United States v. Ruiz (2002). A critical feature of the debate has been the enduring schism between a prosecutor’s legal and ethical obligations – a gulf that the American Bar Association recently …
Fred Zacharias And A Lawyer's Attempt To Be Guided By Justice: Flying With Harry Potter And Understanding How Lawyers Can Prosecute The People They Represent, Randy Lee
Randy Lee
No abstract provided.