Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Brown v. Board of Education (9)
- Civil rights in education (9)
- Separate but equal (9)
- Access to justice (3)
- Arkansas (2)
-
- Civility (2)
- Civility in public discourse (2)
- Incivility (2)
- Internet (2)
- Low-income (2)
- Media (2)
- Relational self-interest (2)
- Supreme court (2)
- "Voices for Justice" (1)
- A2J (1)
- AHR (1)
- Accountability (1)
- Active (1)
- Admissibility standards; Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals (1)
- Admission of Battered Woman Syndrome evidence; admission of Rape Trauma Syndrome evidence; Daubert standard; inadequacy of Battered Woman Syndrome methodology; scientific reliability of Battered Woman Syndrome; courts as gatekeepers of reliable scientific evidence; four factors of Daubert; social sciences; State v. Saldana; State v. Black; scientific reliability of Rape Trauma Syndrome; defense-oriented social science evidence; Black Rage; Black Rage defenses; (1)
- Advertising (1)
- American rule (1)
- Appellate (1)
- Appellate courts (1)
- Appellate coverage (1)
- Appellate recordings (1)
- Arkansas Supreme Court (1)
- Arkansas residential landlord-tenant act (1)
- Arkansas supreme court (1)
- Arkansas tenants (1)
- Publication Year
Articles 61 - 67 of 67
Full-Text Articles in Law
In The Best Interest Of The Child: A Commentary, Lawrence H. Diller M.D.
In The Best Interest Of The Child: A Commentary, Lawrence H. Diller M.D.
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Evolving Judicial Role In Child Custody Disputes: From Fault Finder To Conflict Manager To Differential Case Management, Andrew Schepard J.D.
The Evolving Judicial Role In Child Custody Disputes: From Fault Finder To Conflict Manager To Differential Case Management, Andrew Schepard J.D.
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Child Maltreatment And Endangerment In The Context Of Divorce, Kathleen Coulborn Faller Ph.D.
Child Maltreatment And Endangerment In The Context Of Divorce, Kathleen Coulborn Faller Ph.D.
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Agenda Setting In The Courts Of Appeals: The Effect Of Ideology On En Banc Rehearings, Phil Zarone
Agenda Setting In The Courts Of Appeals: The Effect Of Ideology On En Banc Rehearings, Phil Zarone
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
Intermediate appellate courts hear whatever case is brought before them on appeal. Therefore, the courts are unable to set an agenda through selecting which cases to hear. Appellate courts may be able to set an agenda, though, through en banc rehearings. This article discusses how courts of appeals decide when to grant en banc proceedings and the effect of ideological use of en banc rehearings.
Establishing Deliberative Democracy: Moving From Misery To Poverty With Dignity, Irwin P. Stotzky
Establishing Deliberative Democracy: Moving From Misery To Poverty With Dignity, Irwin P. Stotzky
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
An Unfirm Foundation: The Regrettable Indefensibility Of Religious Exemptions, Frederick Mark Gedicks
An Unfirm Foundation: The Regrettable Indefensibility Of Religious Exemptions, Frederick Mark Gedicks
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Rico—Economic Motive Unnecessary For The Proof Of An Enterprise. National Organization Of Women, Inc. V. Scheidler, 114 S. Ct. 798 (1994)., Bryan W. Riley
Rico—Economic Motive Unnecessary For The Proof Of An Enterprise. National Organization Of Women, Inc. V. Scheidler, 114 S. Ct. 798 (1994)., Bryan W. Riley
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.