Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Indian Law (6)
- Supreme Court (3)
- Tribal rights (3)
- Tribe (3)
- BIA (2)
-
- CERCLA (2)
- Due process (2)
- EPA (2)
- Indian Country (2)
- Mining (2)
- National environmental policy act (2)
- Reservation (2)
- Sovereignty (2)
- Tribal (2)
- Tribal sovereignty (2)
- Water law (2)
- 12898 (1)
- 14008 (1)
- 25 C.F.R. (1)
- APA (1)
- ASARCO LLC v. Atlantic Richfield Co. (1)
- Adjudicatory jurisdiction (1)
- Administrative law (1)
- Adoption (1)
- Adoptive homes (1)
- Alaska Native Corporations (1)
- Alexander Blewett III School of Law (1)
- Anaconda Copper (1)
- And welfare of a tribe (1)
- Annual fee (1)
Articles 61 - 82 of 82
Full-Text Articles in Law
Implementation Of Montana's Strip Mine Legislation, Leo Berry
Implementation Of Montana's Strip Mine Legislation, Leo Berry
Public Land & Resources Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Water Use Act, Gary Wicks
The Water Use Act, Gary Wicks
Public Land & Resources Law Review
No abstract provided.
A Little History And A Few Of Its Heroes, Daniel Kemmis
A Little History And A Few Of Its Heroes, Daniel Kemmis
Public Land & Resources Law Review
No abstract provided.
A Retrospective: The Golden Years, Peter M. Meloy
A Retrospective: The Golden Years, Peter M. Meloy
Public Land & Resources Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Hard Rock Mining Bill: House Bill 243, Harrison Fagg
The Hard Rock Mining Bill: House Bill 243, Harrison Fagg
Public Land & Resources Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Senate Democratic Caucus Of 1975, Thomas E. Towe
The Senate Democratic Caucus Of 1975, Thomas E. Towe
Public Land & Resources Law Review
No abstract provided.
An Epic Depate, Greg Jergeson
An Epic Depate, Greg Jergeson
Public Land & Resources Law Review
No abstract provided.
How House Bill 666 And Grass Roots Democracy Won Subdivision Reform For Montana, John Vincent
How House Bill 666 And Grass Roots Democracy Won Subdivision Reform For Montana, John Vincent
Public Land & Resources Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Montana Environmental Information Center, Robin Nichols
The Montana Environmental Information Center, Robin Nichols
Public Land & Resources Law Review
No abstract provided.
The 1972 Montana State Constitution Declaration Of Rights And The Opportunities On The Bumpy Road Ahead, Rick Applegate
The 1972 Montana State Constitution Declaration Of Rights And The Opportunities On The Bumpy Road Ahead, Rick Applegate
Public Land & Resources Law Review
No abstract provided.
My Glory Days: How I Came To Be In The Right Place At The Right Time., Mae Nan Ellingson
My Glory Days: How I Came To Be In The Right Place At The Right Time., Mae Nan Ellingson
Public Land & Resources Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Writing And Ratification Of The 1972 Montana Constitution, Bob Campbell
The Writing And Ratification Of The 1972 Montana Constitution, Bob Campbell
Public Land & Resources Law Review
No abstract provided.
Alice Creek, Dolores Colburg
Montana (1959 – 1989) Political Evolution — Political Revolution, Ted Schwinden
Montana (1959 – 1989) Political Evolution — Political Revolution, Ted Schwinden
Public Land & Resources Law Review
No abstract provided.
Fmc Corp. V. Shoshone-Bannock Tribes, Seth T. Bonilla
Fmc Corp. V. Shoshone-Bannock Tribes, Seth T. Bonilla
Public Land & Resources Law Review
In 1998, FMC Corporation agreed to submit to the Shoshone-Bannock Tribes’ permitting processes, including the payment of fees, for clean-up work required as part of consent decree negotiations with the Environmental Protection Agency. Then, in 2002, FMC refused to pay the Tribes under a permitting agreement entered into by both parties, even though the company continued to store hazardous waste on land within the Shoshone-Bannock Fort Hall Reservation in Idaho. FMC challenged the Tribes’ authority to enforce the $1.5 million permitting fees first in tribal court and later challenged the Tribes’ authority to exercise civil regulatory and adjudicatory jurisdiction over …
Brackeen V. Zinke, Bradley E. Tinker
Brackeen V. Zinke, Bradley E. Tinker
Public Land & Resources Law Review
In 1978, Congress enacted the Indian Child Welfare Act to counter practices of removing Indian children from their homes, and to ensure the continued existence of Indian tribes through their children. The law created a framework establishing how Indian children are adopted as a way to protect those children and their relationship with their tribe. ICWA also established federal standards for Indian children being placed into non-Indian adoptive homes. Brackeen v. Zinke made an important distinction for the placement preferences of the Indian children adopted by non-Indian plaintiffs; rather than viewing the placement preferences in ICWA as based upon Indians’ …
United States V. Osage Wind, Llc, Summer Carmack
United States V. Osage Wind, Llc, Summer Carmack
Public Land & Resources Law Review
The Osage Nation, as owner of the beneficial interest in its mineral estate, issues federally-approved leases to persons and entities who wish to conduct mineral development on its lands. After an energy-development company, Osage Wind, leased privately-owned surface lands within Tribal reservation boundaries and began to excavate minerals for purposes of constructing a wind farm, the United States brought suit on the Tribe’s behalf. In the ensuing litigation, the Osage Nation insisted that Osage Wind should have obtained a mineral lease from the Tribe before beginning its work. In its decision, the Tenth Circuit applied one of the Indian law …
Lewis V. Clarke, Summer L. Carmack
Lewis V. Clarke, Summer L. Carmack
Public Land & Resources Law Review
One manner in which Indian tribes exercise their inherent sovereignty is by asserting sovereign immunity. In Lewis v. Clarke, the Court decided that the sovereign immunity extended to instrumentalities of tribes did not further extend to tribal employees acting within the scope of their employment. The Court acknowledged the concerns of the lower court, namely, the possibility of setting a precedent allowing future plaintiffs to sidestep a tribe’s sovereign immunity by suing a tribal employee in his individual capacity. However, the Supreme Court ultimately felt that the immunity of tribal employees should not exceed the immunity extended to state …