Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (15)
- Selected Works (9)
- University of Colorado Law School (7)
- American University Washington College of Law (5)
- Duke Law (4)
-
- The University of Akron (4)
- University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School (4)
- University of Pittsburgh School of Law (4)
- Boston University School of Law (3)
- Cleveland State University (3)
- Georgetown University Law Center (3)
- Mitchell Hamline School of Law (3)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (2)
- Chapman University (1)
- Columbia Law School (1)
- Florida State University College of Law (1)
- Golden Gate University School of Law (1)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (1)
- New York Law School (1)
- Notre Dame Law School (1)
- Pepperdine University (1)
- SJ Quinney College of Law, University of Utah (1)
- SelectedWorks (1)
- University at Buffalo School of Law (1)
- University of Baltimore Law (1)
- University of Cincinnati College of Law (1)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (1)
- University of New Hampshire (1)
- University of the District of Columbia School of Law (1)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Washington and Lee Law Review (15)
- Faculty Scholarship (12)
- Publications (7)
- All Faculty Scholarship (5)
- Akron Law Review (4)
-
- American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law (3)
- Articles (3)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (3)
- Journal Articles (3)
- Maya Manian (3)
- Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals (2)
- Cleveland State Law Review (2)
- Rona Kaufman Kitchen (2)
- Amici Briefs (1)
- Angela P Harris (1)
- Articles & Chapters (1)
- Deseriee A. Kennedy (1)
- Golden Gate University Law Review (1)
- Indiana Law Journal (1)
- Law Faculty Articles and Essays (1)
- Law Faculty Books and Book Chapters (1)
- Law Faculty Scholarship (1)
- Northwestern Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property (1)
- Northwestern University Law Review (1)
- Pepperdine Law Review (1)
- Samuel W. Calhoun (1)
- Scholarly Publications (1)
- Stephen G Gilles (1)
- Taunya Lovell Banks (1)
- University of Cincinnati Law Review (1)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 31 - 60 of 82
Full-Text Articles in Law
Constrained Choice: Mothers, The State, And Domestic Violence, Rona Kaufman Kitchen
Constrained Choice: Mothers, The State, And Domestic Violence, Rona Kaufman Kitchen
Rona Kaufman Kitchen
Mothers who are the victims of domestic violence face unique challenges in their quest for safety. The legal response to domestic violence requires that mothers respond to abuse in specific state-sanctioned manners. However, when mothers respond accordingly, such as by reporting abuse and leaving the abusive relationship, their safety and the safety of their children is not guaranteed. Moreover, by responding in state-sanctioned manners, mothers risk a host of negative consequences including increased threat to their immediate and long-term safety, the loss of their children, undesired financial, health, and social consequences, and criminal prosecution. On the other hand, when mothers …
Holistic Pregnancy: Rejecting The Theory Of The Adversarial Mother, Rona Kaufman Kitchen
Holistic Pregnancy: Rejecting The Theory Of The Adversarial Mother, Rona Kaufman Kitchen
Rona Kaufman Kitchen
In its zealous effort to protect the lives and health of unborn children, the law frequently views the expecting mother with suspicion. In its most extreme form, the law regards the potential mother as a potential murderess. This perspective does not reflect the nature of pregnancy, it undermines the autonomy of loving mothers, and it is detrimental to children. Regardless of whether there is any conflict between mother and fetus, the State presumes the mother to be a threat to her fetus and subjugates her rights as a result. The State interferes with the mother’s autonomy, bodily integrity, parental rights, …
Why Strive For Balance In A Roe Symposium?, Samuel W. Calhoun
Why Strive For Balance In A Roe Symposium?, Samuel W. Calhoun
Samuel W. Calhoun
No abstract provided.
Emergency Contraceptives Or "Abortion-Inducing" Drugs? Empowering Women To Make Informed Decisions, Ryan M. Hrobak, Robin Fretwell Wilson
Emergency Contraceptives Or "Abortion-Inducing" Drugs? Empowering Women To Make Informed Decisions, Ryan M. Hrobak, Robin Fretwell Wilson
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
If The Purpose Fits: The Two Functions Of Casey'S Purpose Inquiry, Priscilla J. Smith
If The Purpose Fits: The Two Functions Of Casey'S Purpose Inquiry, Priscilla J. Smith
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Roe'S Effects On Family Law, Lynne Marie Kohm
Roe'S Effects On Family Law, Lynne Marie Kohm
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Re-Reading Roe V. Wade, Richard S. Myers
Re-Reading Roe V. Wade, Richard S. Myers
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Keynote Address: Untying The Moral Knot Of Abortion, Caitlin E. Borgmann
Keynote Address: Untying The Moral Knot Of Abortion, Caitlin E. Borgmann
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Consequences Of Abortion Restrictions For Women's Healthcare, Maya Manian
The Consequences Of Abortion Restrictions For Women's Healthcare, Maya Manian
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Overcoming Barriers To The Protection Of Viable Fetuses, Randy Beck
Overcoming Barriers To The Protection Of Viable Fetuses, Randy Beck
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Why Strive For Balance In A Roe Symposium?, Samuel W. Calhoun
Why Strive For Balance In A Roe Symposium?, Samuel W. Calhoun
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Medical Assumption At The Foundation Of Roe V. Wade And Its Implications For Women's Health, Clarke Forsythe
The Medical Assumption At The Foundation Of Roe V. Wade And Its Implications For Women's Health, Clarke Forsythe
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Abortion Exceptionalism And Undue Burden Preemption, Caitlin E. Borgmann
Abortion Exceptionalism And Undue Burden Preemption, Caitlin E. Borgmann
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Roe, Casey, And Sex-Selection Abortion Bans, Thomas J. Molony
Roe, Casey, And Sex-Selection Abortion Bans, Thomas J. Molony
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Abortion Distortions, Caroline Mala Corbin
Abortion Distortions, Caroline Mala Corbin
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Previability Abortion And The Pain Of The Unborn, Teresa S. Collett
Previability Abortion And The Pain Of The Unborn, Teresa S. Collett
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Virginia's Targeted Regulations Of Abortion Providers: The Attempt To Regulation Abortion Out Of Existence, Katharine Greenier, Rebecca Glenberg
Virginia's Targeted Regulations Of Abortion Providers: The Attempt To Regulation Abortion Out Of Existence, Katharine Greenier, Rebecca Glenberg
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Innocent Burdens, James Edwin Mahon
Innocent Burdens, James Edwin Mahon
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Is There A Federal Definitions Power?, Ernest A. Young
Is There A Federal Definitions Power?, Ernest A. Young
Faculty Scholarship
Although the Supreme Court decided United States v. Windsor on equal protection grounds, that case also raised important and recurring questions about federal power. In particular, defenders of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) argued that Congress may always define the terms used in federal statutes, even if its definition concerns a matter reserved to the States. As the DOMA illustrates, federal definitions concerning reserved matters that depart from state law may impose significant burdens on state governments and private citizens alike. This Article argues that there is no general, freestanding federal definitions power and that sometimes—as with marriage—federal law …
Money, Sex, And Religion--The Supreme Court's Aca Sequel, George J. Annas, Theodore Ruger, Jennifer Prah Ruger
Money, Sex, And Religion--The Supreme Court's Aca Sequel, George J. Annas, Theodore Ruger, Jennifer Prah Ruger
All Faculty Scholarship
The Supreme Court decision in the Hobby Lobby case is in many ways a sequel to the Court's 2012 decision on the constitutionality of the Affordable Care Act (ACA). The majority decision, written by Justice Samuel Alito, is a setback for both the ACA's foundational goal of access to universal health care and for women's health care specifically. The Court's ruling can be viewed as a direct consequence of our fragmented health care system, in which fundamental duties are incrementally delegated and imposed on a range of public and private actors. Our incremental, fragmented, and incomplete health insurance system means …
Benign Sex Discrimination Revisited: Constitutional And Moral Issues In Banning Sex-Selection Abortion , George Schedler
Benign Sex Discrimination Revisited: Constitutional And Moral Issues In Banning Sex-Selection Abortion , George Schedler
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Does The Constitution Protect Abortions Based On Fetal Anomaly?: Examining The Potential For Disability-Selective Abortion Bans In The Age Of Prenatal Whole Genome Sequencing, Greer Donley
Articles
This Note examines whether the state or federal government has the power to enact a law that prevents women from obtaining abortions based on their fetus’s genetic abnormality. Such a ban has already been enacted in North Dakota and introduced in Indiana and Missouri. I argue below that this law presents a novel state intrusion on a woman’s right to obtain a pre-viability abortion. Moreover, these pieces of legislation contain an outdated understanding of prenatal genetic testing—the landscape of which is quickly evolving as a result of a new technology: prenatal whole genome sequencing. This Note argues that the incorporation …
No Promo Hetero: Children's Right To Be Queer, Clifford Rosky
No Promo Hetero: Children's Right To Be Queer, Clifford Rosky
Utah Law Faculty Scholarship
This Article argues that the government has no legitimate interest in promoting heterosexuality or gender conformity during childhood. Although opponents of LGBT rights have longed cited this goal as one of the primary justifications for discrimination against LGBT people, it has no constitutional foundation upon which to stand. Building upon a familiar schema of legal scholarship on LGBT rights, this Article challenges the state’s interest in promoting heterosexuality by articulating a tripartite defense of children’s speech, status, and conduct. It argues that these three aspects of homosexuality are connected to and protected by three constitutional clauses — the First Amendment, …
Hollingsworth V. Perry, Brief For Foreign And Comparative Law Experts Harold Hongju Koh Et. Al. As Amici Curiae Supporting Respondents, Harold Hongju Koh, Sarah H. Cleveland, Laurence R. Helfer, Ryan Goodman
Hollingsworth V. Perry, Brief For Foreign And Comparative Law Experts Harold Hongju Koh Et. Al. As Amici Curiae Supporting Respondents, Harold Hongju Koh, Sarah H. Cleveland, Laurence R. Helfer, Ryan Goodman
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
New York Law Of Domestic Violence, Deseriee Kennedy
New York Law Of Domestic Violence, Deseriee Kennedy
Deseriee A. Kennedy
NEW YORK LAW OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE, 3rd ed., is a comprehensive 2-volume, 7-chapter, hardbound treatise published by West (Thomson-Reuters). The treatise is the seminal authority on domestic violence in New York State covering New York State laws and relevant U.S. Supreme Court cases. The authors of the book are Professor Breger (Albany Law School, Albany, NY), Professor Kennedy (Touro School of Law, Central Islip, NY), Jill M. Zuccardy, Esq. (New York City), and now retired Judge Lee Hand Elkins (formerly Brooklyn Family Court). The treatise and its authors have been cited as authority repeatedly by trial and appellate courts, as …
A Short History Of Sex And Citizenship: The Historians' Amicus Brief In Flores-Villar V. United States, Kristin Collins
A Short History Of Sex And Citizenship: The Historians' Amicus Brief In Flores-Villar V. United States, Kristin Collins
Faculty Scholarship
The historians’ amicus brief that accompanies this essay was submitted to the Supreme Court in Flores-Villar v. United States, an equal protection challenge to federal statutes that regulate the citizenship status of foreign-born children of American parents. When the parents of such children are unmarried, federal law encumbers the ability of American fathers to secure citizenship for their children, while providing American mothers with a nearly unfettered ability to do the same. The general question before the Court in Flores-Villar – and a question that the Court has addressed in sum and substance on two other occasions during the last …
Resolving Conflicts Of Constitution: Inside The Dominican Republic's Constitutional Ban On Abortion, Mia So
Resolving Conflicts Of Constitution: Inside The Dominican Republic's Constitutional Ban On Abortion, Mia So
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Examining Entrenched Masculinities Within The Republican Government Tradition, Jamie Abrams
Examining Entrenched Masculinities Within The Republican Government Tradition, Jamie Abrams
Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals
“May all our citizens be soldiers, and all our soldiers citizens,” Sarah Livingston Jay toasted to revelers celebrating the Revolutionary War in 1789. She expressly conveyed what this article describes as the “foundational fusion” of republican government traditions coupling the military service of citizens-soldiers with male political citizenship. While the core of this fusion is deep, long-standing, and well-documented, this article explores the implicit tensions conveyed in her toast – the dominant masculinity dimensions of this foundational fusion. How do women and black men historically gain full political citizenship and effectuate republican government guarantees given its anchoring in entrenched dominant …
Irrational Women: Informed Consent And Abortion Regret, Maya Manian
Irrational Women: Informed Consent And Abortion Regret, Maya Manian
Maya Manian
This chapter explores the law’s failure in the twenty-first century to treat pregnant women as capable of making their own decisions concerning whether to have an abortion. The Supreme Court’s 2007 decision in Gonzales v. Carhart, which upheld a federal ban on a type of second-trimester abortion that many physicians believe is safest for their patients, brought the question of women’s capacity for abortion decision-making to the forefront of public legal consciousness. In Carhart, the Court abandoned its previous deference and respect for a woman’s right to be her own decision-maker with regard to abortion and instead determined that a …
Thurgood Marshall, The Race Man, And Gender Equality In The Courts, Taunya Banks
Thurgood Marshall, The Race Man, And Gender Equality In The Courts, Taunya Banks
Taunya Lovell Banks
Renowned civil rights advocate and race man Thurgood Marshall came of age as a lawyer during the black protest movement in the 1930s. He represented civil rights protesters, albeit reluctantly, but was ambivalent about post-Brown mass protests. Although Marshall recognized law's limitations, he felt more comfortable using litigation as a tool for social change. His experiences as a legal advocate for racial equality influenced his thinking as a judge. Marshall joined the United States Supreme Court in 1967, as dramatic advancement of black civil rights through litigation waned. Other social movements, notably the women's rights movement, took its place. The …