Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Law and Economics (5)
- Economics (4)
- Law and economics (4)
- Corporations (2)
- Culture (2)
-
- Discrimination (2)
- Eminent domain (2)
- Housing (2)
- Just compensation (2)
- Legal History (2)
- Public policy (2)
- Racial wealth gap (2)
- Socio-economics (2)
- 3D printing (1)
- Abortion care (1)
- Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing (1)
- Aggregate Litigation (1)
- All-or-nothing (1)
- Anthropology (1)
- Banking and Finance (1)
- Bankruptcy (1)
- Behavioral Economics (1)
- Behavioral Law and Economics (1)
- Bersch (1)
- Black land loss (1)
- Burwell v Hobby Lobby Stores (1)
- Canada (1)
- Chicago School (1)
- Children (1)
- Civil Procedure (1)
- Publication
-
- Thomas W. Mitchell (3)
- Jay Tidmarsh (2)
- Peter Siegelman (2)
- Thomas E. Baker (2)
- Dan Danielsen (1)
-
- Daniel A Farber (1)
- Daniel A Monroy C (1)
- Daniel B Kelly (1)
- Daniel L. Rubinfeld (1)
- Evan R. Youngstrom (1)
- Ezra Rosser (1)
- Garry A. Gabison (1)
- James J. Kelly Jr. (1)
- Jeffrey L Harrison (1)
- José Gabilondo (1)
- Kenneth Ayotte (1)
- Kent Greenfield (1)
- Lisa T. Alexander (1)
- Luz Herrera (1)
- Margaret F Brinig (1)
- Obiora Chinedu Okafor (1)
- Patricia A. McCoy (1)
- Poonam Puri (1)
- Steven E Gilmore (1)
- Terry O'Neill (1)
- Tom W. Bell (1)
- Trevor C. W. Farrow (1)
- W. Edward "Ted" Afield (1)
- File Type
Articles 31 - 33 of 33
Full-Text Articles in Law
An Economist Listens To Serial, Peter Siegelman
An Economist Listens To Serial, Peter Siegelman
Peter Siegelman
A very simple screening model applied to the popular Serial podcast.
Protecting The Compromised Worker: : A Challenge For Employment Discrimination Law, Peter Siegelman
Protecting The Compromised Worker: : A Challenge For Employment Discrimination Law, Peter Siegelman
Peter Siegelman
Why do employment discrimination plaintiffs fare so poorly? Many explanations have been offered, but this essay suggests a new one: a substantial fraction of all plaintiffs are “compromised” workers, meaning that they have done something on the job that might plausibly justify the treatment about which they are complaining. As a matter of both doctrine and logic, compromised plaintiffs can be legitimate victims of discrimination. But they face substantial difficulties in proving that their employer relied on a prohibited characteristic in its treatment of them because, by definition, their behavior offers a plausibly legitimate explanation for their treatment. After demonstrating …
Improving Antitrust Sanctions, Daniel L. Rubinfeld
Improving Antitrust Sanctions, Daniel L. Rubinfeld
Daniel L. Rubinfeld
No abstract provided.