Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (32)
- University at Buffalo School of Law (11)
- Golden Gate University School of Law (4)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (3)
- University of Baltimore Law (2)
-
- University of Michigan Law School (2)
- University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School (2)
- Brigham Young University Law School (1)
- California State University, San Bernardino (1)
- Columbia Law School (1)
- Duke Law (1)
- Fordham Law School (1)
- Loyola University Chicago, School of Law (1)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (1)
- New York Law School (1)
- Old Dominion University (1)
- Seattle University School of Law (1)
- Selected Works (1)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (1)
- UIC School of Law (1)
- University of Colorado Law School (1)
- University of Kentucky (1)
- University of Missouri School of Law (1)
- University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Law (1)
- University of North Florida (1)
- University of Oklahoma College of Law (1)
- Western Kentucky University (1)
- Keyword
-
- Capital punishment sentencing (26)
- Capital punishment (7)
- Law enforcement (4)
- Police (4)
- Supreme Court (4)
-
- Death penalty (3)
- Civil Rights (2)
- Criminal law (2)
- Federal courts (2)
- Plea bargaining (2)
- 1995) (1)
- 1996 (1)
- AIDS (1)
- Administration of criminal justice (1)
- Adversary system (1)
- African Americans (1)
- Albany County (1)
- American criminal justice system (1)
- Article 78 (1)
- Bill Clinton (1)
- Bill of Rights (1)
- Bloomington (1)
- Botched hangings (1)
- Bribery (1)
- Canada (1)
- Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms (1)
- Canadian Constitution (1)
- Canine reliability (1)
- Canine training (1)
- Capital adjudication (1)
- Publication
-
- Capital Defense Journal (31)
- Buffalo Law Review (11)
- All Faculty Scholarship (4)
- National Institute of Justice Research in Brief (4)
- Faculty Scholarship (3)
-
- American Indian Law Review (1)
- Articles (1)
- Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law (1)
- Faculty Publications (1)
- Faculty Works (1)
- Federal Communications Law Journal (1)
- Jeffrey Ian Ross Ph.D. (1)
- Kentucky Law Journal (1)
- Loyola University Chicago Law Journal (1)
- Michigan Law Review (1)
- Other Publications (1)
- Publications (1)
- Saffy Collection - All Textual Materials (1)
- Seattle University Law Review (1)
- Sociology & Criminal Justice Theses & Dissertations (1)
- Theses Digitization Project (1)
- Touro Law Review (1)
- UIC Law Open Access Faculty Scholarship (1)
- Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law (1)
- Vanderbilt Law Review (1)
- Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications (1)
- WKU Archives Records (1)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 31 - 60 of 76
Full-Text Articles in Law
Recontextualizing The Context Of The Death Penalty, Daniel D. Polsby
Recontextualizing The Context Of The Death Penalty, Daniel D. Polsby
Buffalo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Reply To Daniel Polsby, Susan Bandes
The Pain Of Punishment, Markus Dirk Dubber
The Risks Of Death: Why Erroneous Convictions Are Common In Capital Cases, Samuel R. Gross
The Risks Of Death: Why Erroneous Convictions Are Common In Capital Cases, Samuel R. Gross
Buffalo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Reply To Daniel Polsby, Samuel R. Gross
Introduction, William S. Geimer, Scott E. Sundby
Introduction, William S. Geimer, Scott E. Sundby
Capital Defense Journal
No abstract provided.
Sheppard V. Commonwealth 250 Va. 379, 464 S.E.2d 131 (1995) Supreme Court Of Virginia
Sheppard V. Commonwealth 250 Va. 379, 464 S.E.2d 131 (1995) Supreme Court Of Virginia
Capital Defense Journal
No abstract provided.
Maximizing Your Potential: The Effective Use Of Co-Counsel In A Capital Case, Courtney S. Townes
Maximizing Your Potential: The Effective Use Of Co-Counsel In A Capital Case, Courtney S. Townes
Capital Defense Journal
No abstract provided.
Fry V. Commonwealth 250 Va. 413, 463 S.E.2d 433 (1995) Supreme Court Of Virginia
Fry V. Commonwealth 250 Va. 413, 463 S.E.2d 433 (1995) Supreme Court Of Virginia
Capital Defense Journal
No abstract provided.
Litigating Jury Issues In Capital Trials: Constitutional Law And Virginia Procedures, Paula Dyan Effle
Litigating Jury Issues In Capital Trials: Constitutional Law And Virginia Procedures, Paula Dyan Effle
Capital Defense Journal
No abstract provided.
Dna Evidence In Virginia, Steven M. Johnson
Dna Evidence In Virginia, Steven M. Johnson
Capital Defense Journal
No abstract provided.
Daubert And The Use Of Experts In Virginia Capital Cases, J. Conrad Garcia
Daubert And The Use Of Experts In Virginia Capital Cases, J. Conrad Garcia
Capital Defense Journal
No abstract provided.
Faith In Fantasy: The Supreme Court's Reliance On Commutation To Ensure Justice In Death Penalty Cases, Victoria J. Palacios
Faith In Fantasy: The Supreme Court's Reliance On Commutation To Ensure Justice In Death Penalty Cases, Victoria J. Palacios
Vanderbilt Law Review
Since scarcely a decade after Furman v. Georgia,' the Supreme Court has struggled to avoid review of death penalty cases by narrowing the grounds defendants can use to challenge their sentences, as well as the procedures they can use to make those challenges. The Court supports its jurisprudence and the deregulation of death with an important but unexamined assumption: whatever shortcomings exist in the administration of the death penalty, ultimately injustice can and will be avoided by the exercise of the commutation power at the state level.
This Article argues that such an assumption is unwarranted. By substituting the fantasy …
A Double-Barrelled Assault: How Technology And Judicial Interpretations Threaten Public Access To Law Enforcement Records, Jamison S. Prime
A Double-Barrelled Assault: How Technology And Judicial Interpretations Threaten Public Access To Law Enforcement Records, Jamison S. Prime
Federal Communications Law Journal
Recently, an explosion of media coverage has revealed gross misconduct on the part of many police officers in the United States. From Rodney King to Mark Furman, the events have raised grave questions about whether existing checks against police misconduct are effective. Yet, at this crucial period, technological advances and judicial interpretations undermine the ability of the public to access police records. The Author argues that most Freedom of Information (FOI) statutes provide inadequate access to police records in light of technological advances and narrow judicial interpretations of FOI statutes.
Turner V. Jabe 58 F.3d 924 (4th Cir. 1995) United States Court Of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Turner V. Jabe 58 F.3d 924 (4th Cir. 1995) United States Court Of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Capital Defense Journal
No abstract provided.
Townes V. Murray 68 F.3d 84 (4th Cir. 1995) United States Court Of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Townes V. Murray 68 F.3d 84 (4th Cir. 1995) United States Court Of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Capital Defense Journal
No abstract provided.
Roach V. Commonwealth 1996 Wl 88107 (Va. 1996) Supreme Court Of Virginia
Roach V. Commonwealth 1996 Wl 88107 (Va. 1996) Supreme Court Of Virginia
Capital Defense Journal
No abstract provided.
Taking The Offensive: Proactive Use Of The Rules Of Evidence, Angela Dale Fields
Taking The Offensive: Proactive Use Of The Rules Of Evidence, Angela Dale Fields
Capital Defense Journal
No abstract provided.
Challenging The Future Dangerousness Aggravating Factor, Michael H. Spencer
Challenging The Future Dangerousness Aggravating Factor, Michael H. Spencer
Capital Defense Journal
No abstract provided.
What To Do When You're Ambushed By Undisclosed Evidence Of Unadjudicated Acts To Show Future Dangerousness, Douglas S. Collica
What To Do When You're Ambushed By Undisclosed Evidence Of Unadjudicated Acts To Show Future Dangerousness, Douglas S. Collica
Capital Defense Journal
No abstract provided.
Consistently Inconsistent: The Supreme Court And The Confusion Surrounding Proportionality In Non-Capital Sentencing, Steven P. Grossman
Consistently Inconsistent: The Supreme Court And The Confusion Surrounding Proportionality In Non-Capital Sentencing, Steven P. Grossman
All Faculty Scholarship
(Adapted by permission from 84 Ky. L. J. 107 (1995)) This article examines the Supreme Court's treatment of the Eighth Amendment with respect to claims of excessiveness regarding prison sentences. Specifically, it addresses the issue of whether and to what degree the Eighth Amendment requires that a punishment not be disproportional to the crime punished. In analyzing all of the modern holdings of the Court in this area, one finds significant fault with each. The result of this series of flawed opinions from the Supreme Court is that the state of the law with respect to proportionality in sentencing is …
The Meaning Of The "Unnecessary Rigor" Provision In The Utah Constitution, James G. Mclaren
The Meaning Of The "Unnecessary Rigor" Provision In The Utah Constitution, James G. Mclaren
Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law
No abstract provided.
Implementation Challenges In Community Policing: Innovative Neighborhood-Oriented Policing In Eight Cities, Us Department Of Justice
Implementation Challenges In Community Policing: Innovative Neighborhood-Oriented Policing In Eight Cities, Us Department Of Justice
National Institute of Justice Research in Brief
No abstract provided.
Nij Awards In Fiscal Year 1995, Us Department Of Justice
Nij Awards In Fiscal Year 1995, Us Department Of Justice
National Institute of Justice Research in Brief
No abstract provided.
Predicting Pretrial Misconduct With Drug Tests Of Arrestees, Us Department Of Justice
Predicting Pretrial Misconduct With Drug Tests Of Arrestees, Us Department Of Justice
National Institute of Justice Research in Brief
No abstract provided.
Shaking The Foundation Of Gideon: A Critique Of Nichols In Overruling Baldasar V. Illinois, 25 Hofstra L. Rev. 507 (1996), Ralph Ruebner, Jennifer Berner, Anne Herbert
Shaking The Foundation Of Gideon: A Critique Of Nichols In Overruling Baldasar V. Illinois, 25 Hofstra L. Rev. 507 (1996), Ralph Ruebner, Jennifer Berner, Anne Herbert
UIC Law Open Access Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
A "Civil" Method Of Law Enforcement On The Reservation: In Rem Forfeiture And Indian Law, Henry S. Noyes
A "Civil" Method Of Law Enforcement On The Reservation: In Rem Forfeiture And Indian Law, Henry S. Noyes
American Indian Law Review
No abstract provided.
Juror Empathy And Race, Douglas O. Linder
Ua12/8 Chief News, Wku Police
Ua12/8 Chief News, Wku Police
WKU Archives Records
WKU Police departmental newsletters for 1996.
Bribery Among The Korean Elite: Putting An End To A Cultural Ritual And Restoring Honor, Daniel Y. Jun
Bribery Among The Korean Elite: Putting An End To A Cultural Ritual And Restoring Honor, Daniel Y. Jun
Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law
On August 26, 1996, the criminal bribery convictions of two former South Korean Presidents sent shockwaves throughout the nation of South Korea. The court found former Presidents Chun Doo Hwan and Rof Tae Woo guilty of amassing hundreds of millions of dollars in bribes during their respective presidential terms. The court also found corporate executives of major Korean conglomerates guilty of bribing the former Presidents in exchange for government contracts or political favors. Such events invite a look into South Korea's difficult past, revealing a history of remarkable industrial progress tarnished by pervasive government corruption. This Note first explores South …