Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Growth Management Act (17)
- Growth management (12)
- Land use (12)
- Law (12)
- Affirmative Action (6)
-
- SFFA (6)
- Arctic (5)
- Development regulation (5)
- Diversity (5)
- GMA (4)
- Washington (4)
- Corporate Law (3)
- Environment (3)
- Fifth Amendment (3)
- Land (3)
- Seattle University (3)
- Seattle University Law Review (3)
- Supreme Court (3)
- Takings (3)
- Washington State (3)
- Zoning (3)
- Building permits (2)
- Change (2)
- Climate (2)
- Corporate Governance (2)
- Corporate law (2)
- ESG (2)
- Education (2)
- Eminent domain (2)
- Environmental (2)
Articles 121 - 125 of 125
Full-Text Articles in Law
Regulatory Taking Doctrine In Washington: Now You See It, Now You Don't, Richard L. Settle
Regulatory Taking Doctrine In Washington: Now You See It, Now You Don't, Richard L. Settle
Seattle University Law Review
Within a recent two-month period, the Washington Supreme Court issued decisions in two major regulatory taking cases, Orion Corporation v. State, and Allingham v. City of Seattle. In both cases, land use regulations were challenged on the basis of the taking clauses of the federal and state constitutions. This Article analyzes and critically assesses Orion's ambitious doctrinal initiative in light of the Allingham enigma and charts a tentative course toward more coherent regulatory taking doctrine. A pervasive and hopeful theme of the Article is that a latent, largely unarticulated or misstated doctrine exists, just waiting for explicit judicial …
The Public Trust Doctrine In Washington, A. Reid Allison Iii
The Public Trust Doctrine In Washington, A. Reid Allison Iii
Seattle University Law Review
This Article addresses questions of resource allocation and property rights, first, by presenting a brief description of the historical and legal foundation of coastal resource allocation in the United States: the “public trust doctrine.” Second, a survey of the Washington experience demonstrates, surprisingly, that a state whose 2,337 miles of marine coastline approximately equals the length of the entire remaining coastline of the contiguous western United States, has managed to establish a viable and responsive regulatory regime governing coastal resource use with scarcely a mention in its laws of the “public trust doctrine.”
Substantive Decision-Making Under The Washington Shoreline Management Act, William H. Chapman
Substantive Decision-Making Under The Washington Shoreline Management Act, William H. Chapman
Seattle University Law Review
The specific purposes of this Article are twofold: first, an analysis of the SMA is set forth and then used in simple statistical comparisons to evaluate decisions rendered by local governments, superior courts, and the Shorelines Hearings Board (SHB) during the period 1974-1983; second, to present a numerical model that represents the verbal interpretation of the SMA with a simple arithmetical equation using weighted variables. These variables correspond to objectives identified in interpretations of the SMA. Decisions of the SHB and appellate courts during this period are explained in a statistical manner through use of the model. Neither computer7 nor …
Miotke V. City Of Spokane: Nuisance Or Inverse Condemnation—Theories For Government Environmental Liability, Gary L. Baker
Miotke V. City Of Spokane: Nuisance Or Inverse Condemnation—Theories For Government Environmental Liability, Gary L. Baker
Seattle University Law Review
A recent decision by the Washington State Supreme Court, Miotke v. City of Spokane, may broadly affect the right to and type of recovery that will be available to persons whose property rights are infringed either by an agent of the state or by private parties. Miotke involved the dumping of untreated sewage into a river, with the sewage flowing into a lake and interfering with lakefront property owners' enjoyment of their property. The court in Miotke faced a set of claims in property, tort, and state environmental law. The court recognized the significance of its decision and the …
Enforceability Of Land Use Servitudes Benefiting Local Government In Washington, Stephen Phillabaum
Enforceability Of Land Use Servitudes Benefiting Local Government In Washington, Stephen Phillabaum
Seattle University Law Review
Washington courts are free to enforce publicland use servitudes. Of the elements required for a servitude to run with the land, form, notice, and touch and concern on the burden side do not bar running. Only the touch and concern element applied on the benefit side is a potential bar. Washington conceivably could allow public land use servitudes to run with the land by following the minority position of not requiring touch and concern on the benefit side. A less stringent theory, however, is available to enforce public land use servitudes. Washington has not adopted a rule that public servitudes …