Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- University of Colorado Law School (7)
- University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School (7)
- Georgetown University Law Center (2)
- American University Washington College of Law (1)
- Boston University School of Law (1)
-
- Columbia Law School (1)
- Emory University School of Law (1)
- Georgia State University College of Law (1)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (1)
- Mitchell Hamline School of Law (1)
- Notre Dame Law School (1)
- Pace University (1)
- University at Buffalo School of Law (1)
- University of Connecticut (1)
- University of Florida Levin College of Law (1)
- University of Georgia School of Law (1)
- University of Miami Law School (1)
- University of Michigan Law School (1)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (1)
- University of the Pacific (1)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (1)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (1)
- Keyword
-
- Jurisprudence (7)
- Constitutional Law (3)
- Legal Philosophy (3)
- Philosophy (3)
- Stare decisis (3)
-
- Bureau of Indian Affairs (2)
- Environment (2)
- Indian Reorganization Act (2)
- Law and Society (2)
- Oregon (2)
- Originalism (2)
- Politics (2)
- Precedent (2)
- Separation of powers (2)
- State taxation (2)
- Supreme Court (2)
- Taxation (2)
- United States (2)
- 1985 U.S.-Canada Salmon Interception treaty (1)
- Access to capital (1)
- Acclamation facilities (1)
- Active governments (1)
- Adoption (1)
- Alternative methods (1)
- Anadromous fish runs (1)
- Antitrust (1)
- Appellate Review; Courts; Sentencing and Punishment; Penology; Jurisprudence (1)
- Apportionment and priority scheme (1)
- Arizona (1)
- Arizona v. California (1)
- Publication
-
- All Faculty Scholarship (7)
- Natural Resource Development in Indian Country (Summer Conference, June 8-10) (6)
- Faculty Scholarship (3)
- Articles (2)
- Faculty Articles (2)
-
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (2)
- Journal Articles (2)
- Scholarly Works (2)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (1)
- Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals (1)
- Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications (1)
- Faculty Articles and Papers (1)
- Faculty Publications By Year (1)
- McGeorge School of Law Scholarly Articles (1)
- Publications (1)
- Scholarly Articles (1)
- UF Law Faculty Publications (1)
Articles 31 - 35 of 35
Full-Text Articles in Law
Four Predictions For The Criminal Law Of 2043, Paul H. Robinson
Four Predictions For The Criminal Law Of 2043, Paul H. Robinson
All Faculty Scholarship
The Model Penal Code has all the markings of an historic document. It is a sophisticated and enlightened model for penal reform that has put the United States in the front row of reformers. And many believe that the likes of such an historic reform will not come again for more than another century. In my view, it can hardly be disputed that the Code is an historic document. It is less clear, however, that we should not expect a dramatically different code before another century.
Making Sense Of Modern Jurisprudence: The Paradox Of Positivism And The Challenge For Natural Law, Philip E. Soper
Making Sense Of Modern Jurisprudence: The Paradox Of Positivism And The Challenge For Natural Law, Philip E. Soper
Articles
Karl Llewellyn once said, referring to Roscoe Pound's work m jurisprudence, that it was difficult to tell on what level the writing proceeded: sometimes it seemed to be little more than bedtime stones for a tired bar; at other tunes it appeared to be on the level of the after-dinner speech or a thought provoking essay, neither of which were quite the "considered and buttressed scholarly discussion" that one expected to find. Llewellyn's complaint serves as a warning, though a somewhat ambiguous one, to those who give lectures on jurisprudence.
On the one hand, I do not plan to present …
The Misadventures Of State Postconviction Remedies, Larry Yackle
The Misadventures Of State Postconviction Remedies, Larry Yackle
Faculty Scholarship
In a colloquium concentrating on the lower federal courts' jurisdiction to determine federal claims, it falls to me to treat state court opportunities to adjudicate the same issues in advance of, as an aid to, or in place of federal litigation. To do that, I will have to recount some conventional wisdom regarding the development of federal habeas corpus and state postconviction remedies in tandem during the last half century. In due course, I hope to solicit support for an unconventional conclusion to be drawn from that experience.
Precedent And Legal Authority: A Critical History, Charles W. Collier
Precedent And Legal Authority: A Critical History, Charles W. Collier
UF Law Faculty Publications
In this Article, Professor Charles Collier traces out a general theory of precedential authority through historical sources. The Article focuses on three particularly influential views of precedent: Wambaugh's concept of dictum, Oliphant's concept of stare decisis, and Goodhart's concept of ratio decidendi. These views illustrate an underlying tension between two distinct doctrines of precedential authority. The first doctrine, derived from humanistic thought, restricts-legal authority as narrowly as possible to the express terms of an original text. The second doctrine draws on the broad, generalizing tendencies of the empirical sciences and their corresponding conceptions of scientific authority. The two doctrines coexist …
The Tax Treatment Of Qualified Plans: A Classic Defense Of The Status Quo, Edward A. Zelinsky
The Tax Treatment Of Qualified Plans: A Classic Defense Of The Status Quo, Edward A. Zelinsky
Faculty Articles
The current tax treatment of qualified pension and profit sharing plans has been criticized by commentators as an unfair and expensive tax expenditure. In this Article, Professor Zelinsky challenges this characterization and defends the current treatment of qualified plans on the ground that it is at least as attractive as its alternatives and superior to many of them. After evaluating the current treatment and the alternatives under the criteria of measurability, administrability, liquidity, equity, and simplicity, Professor Zelinsky concludes that the present treatment of qualified plans can be viewed as an acceptable part of a normative income tax.