Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- University of Michigan Law School (14)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (4)
- William & Mary Law School (3)
- University of Colorado Law School (2)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (2)
-
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (2)
- BLR (1)
- Cleveland State University (1)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (1)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (1)
- University of Cincinnati College of Law (1)
- University of Oklahoma College of Law (1)
- University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School (1)
- University of Richmond (1)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Michigan Law Review (13)
- Faculty Publications (3)
- Indiana Law Journal (3)
- Publications (2)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (2)
-
- All Faculty Scholarship (1)
- American Indian Law Review (1)
- Articles (1)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (1)
- Cleveland State Law Review (1)
- ExpressO (1)
- Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business (1)
- Touro Law Review (1)
- University of Cincinnati Law Review (1)
- University of Richmond Law Review (1)
- Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law (1)
- Vanderbilt Law Review (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 31 - 35 of 35
Full-Text Articles in Law
Suits Against Unincorporated Associations Under The Federal Rules Of Civil Procedure, John Kaplan
Suits Against Unincorporated Associations Under The Federal Rules Of Civil Procedure, John Kaplan
Michigan Law Review
Concepts, Benjamin Cardozo has said, "are useful, indeed indispensable, if kept within their place. We will press them quite a distance. . . . A time comes, however, when the concepts carry us too far, or farther than we are ready to go with them, and behold, some other concept, with capacity to serve our needs is waiting at the gate. 'It is a peculiar virtue of our system of law that the process of inclusion and exclusion, so often employed in developing a rule, is not allowed to end with its enunciation, and that an expression in an opinion …
Federal Procedure - Realignment Of Parties In Non-Diversity Case, David D. Dowd, Jr S.Ed.
Federal Procedure - Realignment Of Parties In Non-Diversity Case, David D. Dowd, Jr S.Ed.
Michigan Law Review
Plaintiff (S1), a surety for the subcontractor, brought an action against the subcontractor and the prime contractor to compel them to set off their respective counterclaims in order to diminish the liability of S1. The subcontractor had another surety (S2) on a different obligation arising out of the same construction job, and the prime contractor, uncertain where liability should be placed, impleaded S2. On S1's motion to vacate the impleader order, held, denied, and the court on its own motion directed realignment of the parties, ruling that the main issue was division of …
Amendments To The Federal Rules: The Function Of A Continuing Rules Committee, Charles A. Wright
Amendments To The Federal Rules: The Function Of A Continuing Rules Committee, Charles A. Wright
Vanderbilt Law Review
No development in American procedural history in the last century has exceeded in importance the adoption by the United States Supreme Court in 1938 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. These rules, the product of a distinguished Advisory Committee, introduced a system and a philosophy differing as markedly from the code pleading then in vogue as code pleading, in its day, had differed from common-law pleading. This new system has worked well in the federal courts, so well indeed as to stimulate a reexamination of procedure in many of the states, with nearly a dozen jurisdiction shaving already adopted …
The Federal Jurisdictional Amount Requirement And Joinder Of Parties Under The Federal Rules Of Civil Procedure
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Federal Courts-Use Of A Cross-Claim Under Rule 13(G) Of The Federal Rules Of Civil Procedure, Rex Eames S.Ed.
Federal Courts-Use Of A Cross-Claim Under Rule 13(G) Of The Federal Rules Of Civil Procedure, Rex Eames S.Ed.
Michigan Law Review
Under an ordinary automobile insurance policy, P insurance company promised to defend and indemnify Harvey for any suit arising from an accident involving his use of the insured truck. Collier sued Harvey in a state court alleging injuries due to the negligent use of the insured truck by two Harvey employees. Before judgment thereon, P, incorporated under the laws of Wisconsin, sued Harvey and Collier, citizens of Oklahoma, in the federal court. P sought a declaratory judgment on the grounds that (a) at the time of the accident the employees were under the control and supervision of the City …