Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Pepperdine University (6)
- Selected Works (4)
- Duke Law (3)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (3)
- Barry University School of Law (2)
-
- SelectedWorks (2)
- University of Baltimore Law (2)
- University of Colorado Law School (2)
- University of Richmond (2)
- Cornell University Law School (1)
- Fordham Law School (1)
- Golden Gate University School of Law (1)
- Sacred Heart University (1)
- St. John's University School of Law (1)
- University of Miami Law School (1)
- University of New Hampshire (1)
- University of Oklahoma College of Law (1)
- University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School (1)
- University of Pittsburgh School of Law (1)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (1)
- Washington University in St. Louis (1)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (1)
- Publication
-
- Faculty Scholarship (6)
- Pepperdine Law Review (6)
- All Faculty Scholarship (3)
- Laura K. Ray (3)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (2)
-
- Publications (2)
- American Indian Law Review (1)
- Articles (1)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (1)
- Faculty Publications (1)
- Golden Gate University Law Review (1)
- Herma Hill Kay (1)
- Indiana Law Journal (1)
- Law Faculty Publications (1)
- Librarian Publications (1)
- Melissa R Hart (1)
- Scholarly Articles (1)
- Scholarship@WashULaw (1)
- The University of New Hampshire Law Review (1)
- University of Miami International and Comparative Law Review (1)
- University of Richmond Law Review (1)
- Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications (1)
- Zena Denise Crenshaw-Logal (1)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 31 - 39 of 39
Full-Text Articles in Law
Understanding The United States' Incarceration Rate, William T. Pizzi
Understanding The United States' Incarceration Rate, William T. Pizzi
Publications
What has caused prison sentences to climb so sharply and consistently in the last four decades?
Locking The Doors To Discovery? Assessing The Effects Of Twombly And Iqbal On Access To Discovery, Jonah B. Gelbach
Locking The Doors To Discovery? Assessing The Effects Of Twombly And Iqbal On Access To Discovery, Jonah B. Gelbach
All Faculty Scholarship
Many observers believe the Supreme Court’s Twombly and Iqbal opinions have curtailed access to civil justice. But previous empirical studies looking only at Rule 12(b)(6) grant rates have failed to capture the full effect of these cases because they have not accounted for party selection—changes in party behavior that can be expected following changes in pleading standards. In this Note, I show how party selection can be expected to undermine the empirical usefulness of simple grant-rate comparisons. I then use a conceptual model of party behavior that allows me to derive an adjusted measure of Twombly/Iqbal’s impact and show …
Judicial Selection Reconsidered: A Plea For Radical Moderation, Charles G. Geyh
Judicial Selection Reconsidered: A Plea For Radical Moderation, Charles G. Geyh
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
Sonia Sotomayor And The Construction Of Merit, Guy-Uriel Charles, Daniel L. Chen, Mitu Gulati
Sonia Sotomayor And The Construction Of Merit, Guy-Uriel Charles, Daniel L. Chen, Mitu Gulati
Faculty Scholarship
The appointment of Sonia Sotomayor to the Supreme Court in 2009 was criticized as sacrificing merit on the altar of identity politics. According to critics, Sotomayor was simply “not that smart”. For some conservative critics, her selection illustrated the costs of affirmative action policies, in that this particular choice was going to produce a lower quality Supreme Court. For liberal critics, many were concerned that the President, by selecting Sotomayor, was squandering an opportunity to appoint an intellectual counterweight to conservative justices like Antonin Scalia, Samuel Alito and John Roberts. Using a set of basic measures of judicial merit, such …
The Pragmatic Court: Reinterpreting The Supreme People’S Court Of China, Taisu Zhang
The Pragmatic Court: Reinterpreting The Supreme People’S Court Of China, Taisu Zhang
Faculty Scholarship
This Article examines the institutional motivations that underlie several major developments in the Supreme People's Court of China's recent policy-making. Since 2007, the SPC has sent off a collection of policy signals that escapes sweeping ideological labeling: it has publically embraced a populist view of legal reform by encouraging the use of mediation in dispute resolution and popular participation in judicial policy-making, while continuing to advocate legal professionalization as a long-term policy objective. It has also eagerly attempted to enhance its own institutional competence by promoting judicial efficiency, simplifying key areas of civil law, and expanding its control over lower …
Evaluating And Improving The Mdl Process, Francis Mcgovern, John G. Heyburn
Evaluating And Improving The Mdl Process, Francis Mcgovern, John G. Heyburn
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Interpretive Divergence All The Way Down: A Response To Aaron-Andrew P. Bruhl And Ethan J. Leib, Elected Judges And Statutory Interpretation, 79 U Chi L Rev 1215 (2012), Anita S. Krishnakumar
Interpretive Divergence All The Way Down: A Response To Aaron-Andrew P. Bruhl And Ethan J. Leib, Elected Judges And Statutory Interpretation, 79 U Chi L Rev 1215 (2012), Anita S. Krishnakumar
Faculty Publications
This article is a response to the law review article cited in its title. It focuses on a corollary question raised by the article's analysis: if one takes seriously the proposition that it may make sense for elected judges to interpret statutes differently than do appointed judges, should judicial opinions written by elected judges look substantially different from those written by appointed judges? Part I examines the relative roles of judicial opinions written by elected versus appointed judges in a world in which divergence is practiced. Part II explores specific ways in which we might want or expect an elected …
Doctrinal Conversation: Justice Kagan's Supreme Court Opinions, Laura Ray
Doctrinal Conversation: Justice Kagan's Supreme Court Opinions, Laura Ray
Laura K. Ray
In her first two terms on the Supreme Court, Justice Elena Kagan has crafted a distinctive judicial voice that speaks to her readers in a remarkably conversational tone. She employs a variety of rhetorical devices: invocations to “remember” or “pretend”; informal and even colloquial diction; a diverse assortment of similes and metaphors; and parenthetical interjections that guide the reader’s response. These strategies engage the reader in much the same way that Kagan as law professor may well have worked to engage her students, and in the context of judicial opinions they serve several purposes. They make Kagan’s opinions accessible to …
From The Bench To The Screen: The Woman Judge In Film, Laura Ray
From The Bench To The Screen: The Woman Judge In Film, Laura Ray
Laura K. Ray
Although there has been a dramatic increase in the number of women judges over the past half century, their cinematic counterparts have failed to reflect that change. This Article explores the paradoxical relationship between social reality and its representation on screen to identify a lingering resistance to the idea of women exercising judicial power. The Article first examines the sparse history of women judges as central characters in films of the 1930s, finding the tension in those films between judicial authority and domestic happiness. It then turns to Hollywood’s romantic comedies of the 1940s, which resolved that tension through the …