Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Non-Party States (2)
- A comparative analysis of national rules in the United States (1)
- But not crimes against humanity (rape) (1)
- Expert Witnesses (1)
- Has been charged in an indictment? (1)
-
- Is evidence of rape relevant and therefore admissible where genocide (1)
- Prosecutor and Defense Counsel on making commentary to the press in an ongoing case (1)
- Proving The Nexus Between A Criminal Defendant And The Criminal Conducts Of Subordinates And Associates In War Crimes Charges Pursuant To Article 4 Of The ICTR (1)
- Superior Responsibility absent the Subordinate being formally charged (1)
- Surrender Of Accused By Domestic States To The ICTR (1)
- Terrorism (1)
- The United Kingdom and Canada on the ethical duties of a Judge (1)
- The balancing of the rights of the accused against the rights of a witness in regard to anonymous testimony. (1)
- The concept of withdrawal from a conspiracy (1)
- The decision by the Appeals Chamber in Jelisić not to remit the case for trial after reversing a mid-trial acquittal (1)
- The degree of corroboration required for a witness’ testimony to be considered credible by the Trial Chamber. (1)
- The exercise of universal jurisdiction by belgium over ICTR targets (1)
- Undue Delay (1)
- Publication
Articles 1 - 15 of 15
Full-Text Articles in Law
Expert Witnesses, Kimberly M. Miles
Proving The Nexus Between A Criminal Defendant And The Criminal Conducts Of Subordinates And Associates In War Crimes Charges Pursuant To Article 4 Of The Ictr, Richard Davies
War Crimes Memoranda
No abstract provided.
A Comparative Analysis Of National Rules In The United States, The United Kingdom And Canada On The Ethical Duties Of A Judge, Prosecutor And Defense Counsel On Making Commentary To The Press In An Ongoing Case, Bradley M.J. Kellogg
War Crimes Memoranda
No abstract provided.
Is Evidence Of Rape Relevant And Therefore Admissible Where Genocide, But Not Crimes Against Humanity (Rape), Has Been Charged In An Indictment?, Kathleen Cavanaugh
Is Evidence Of Rape Relevant And Therefore Admissible Where Genocide, But Not Crimes Against Humanity (Rape), Has Been Charged In An Indictment?, Kathleen Cavanaugh
War Crimes Memoranda
No abstract provided.
The Concept Of Withdrawal From A Conspiracy, Tammy Lopez
The Concept Of Withdrawal From A Conspiracy, Tammy Lopez
War Crimes Memoranda
No abstract provided.
The Degree Of Corroboration Required For A Witness’ Testimony To Be Considered Credible By The Trial Chamber., Patricia Wedding
The Degree Of Corroboration Required For A Witness’ Testimony To Be Considered Credible By The Trial Chamber., Patricia Wedding
War Crimes Memoranda
No abstract provided.
The Exercise Of Universal Jurisdiction By Belgium Over Ictr Targets, Julia J. Carabillo
The Exercise Of Universal Jurisdiction By Belgium Over Ictr Targets, Julia J. Carabillo
War Crimes Memoranda
No abstract provided.
Undue Delay, Kelly M. Before
The Balancing Of The Rights Of The Accused Against The Rights Of A Witness In Regard To Anonymous Testimony., Anna M. Haughton
The Balancing Of The Rights Of The Accused Against The Rights Of A Witness In Regard To Anonymous Testimony., Anna M. Haughton
War Crimes Memoranda
No abstract provided.
Superior Responsibility Absent The Subordinate Being Formally Charged, Chad Frederick Affsa
Superior Responsibility Absent The Subordinate Being Formally Charged, Chad Frederick Affsa
War Crimes Memoranda
No abstract provided.
Surrender Of Accused By Domestic States To The Ictr, Agnes Escurel
Surrender Of Accused By Domestic States To The Ictr, Agnes Escurel
War Crimes Memoranda
No abstract provided.
The Decision By The Appeals Chamber In Jelisić Not To Remit The Case For Trial After Reversing A Mid-Trial Acquittal, Gregory P. Lombardi
The Decision By The Appeals Chamber In Jelisić Not To Remit The Case For Trial After Reversing A Mid-Trial Acquittal, Gregory P. Lombardi
War Crimes Memoranda
No abstract provided.
The International Criminal Court's Jurisdiction Over The Nationals Of Non - Party States: A Critique Of The U.S. Position, Michael P. Scharf
The International Criminal Court's Jurisdiction Over The Nationals Of Non - Party States: A Critique Of The U.S. Position, Michael P. Scharf
Faculty Publications
This article analyzes the validity of the U.S. argument against the ICC's jurisdiction over the nationals of non-party states in the context of historic precedent and the principles underlying international criminal jurisdiction, and demonstrates that it is not the jurisdiction of the ICC over the nationals of non-party states, but the U.S. government's legal argument, which rests on shaky foundations. The article also highlights the potential unintended repercussions of the current U.S. legal position. This analysis could have a substantial bearing on the approach the United States takes to the Rome Statute, for it indicates that the United States actually …
The Icc's Jurisdiction Over The Nationals Of Non-Party States: A Critique Of The U.S. Position, Michael P. Scharf
The Icc's Jurisdiction Over The Nationals Of Non-Party States: A Critique Of The U.S. Position, Michael P. Scharf
Faculty Publications
This article analyzes the validity of the U.S. argument against the ICC's jurisdiction over the nationals of non-party states in the context of historic precedent and the principles underlying international criminal jurisdiction, and demonstrates that it is not the jurisdiction of the ICC over the nationals of non- party states, but the U.S. government's legal argument, which rests on shaky foundations. The article also highlights the potential unintended repercussions of the current U.S. legal position. This analysis could have a substantial bearing on the approach the United States takes to the Rome Statute, for it indicates that the United States …
Defining Terrorism As The Peace Time Equivalent Of War Crimes: A Case Of Too Much Convergence Between International Humanitarian Law And International Criminal Law, Michael P. Scharf
Defining Terrorism As The Peace Time Equivalent Of War Crimes: A Case Of Too Much Convergence Between International Humanitarian Law And International Criminal Law, Michael P. Scharf
Faculty Publications
The problem of defining "terrorism" has vexed the international community for years. The United Nations General Assembly has repeatedly called for the convening of an international conference to define terrorism and distinguish it from legitimate acts in furtherance of national liberation struggles.' A decade ago, representing the United States, I gave a speech in the United Nations Sixth (Legal) Committee, in which I pointed out that general definitions of terrorism "are notoriously difficult to achieve and dangerous in what all but the most perfect of definitions excludes by chance." Today, we hear calls for a renewed effort to reach international …