Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
- Keyword
-
- Ohio (12)
- State law; State administrative decision; (12)
- Evidence (3)
- Litigation (3)
- Non-Party States (2)
-
- A comparative analysis of national rules in the United States (1)
- Autonomy (1)
- Beneficence (1)
- But not crimes against humanity (rape) (1)
- Certainty (1)
- Character (1)
- Clinical research (1)
- Constitution (1)
- Constitutional Law (1)
- Criminal Procedure (1)
- Expert Witnesses (1)
- FDA (1)
- HHS (1)
- Hair (1)
- Has been charged in an indictment? (1)
- Institutional Review Board (1)
- Intenet Service Providers (1)
- Internationalize study of law (1)
- Is evidence of rape relevant and therefore admissible where genocide (1)
- Law Library (1)
- Mapp v. Ohio (1)
- Naturalized epistemology Theory of evidence (1)
- New England Law School (1)
- Other Acts (1)
- Patent Law (1)
Articles 1 - 30 of 43
Full-Text Articles in Law
Appeal No. 0774: Stonebridge Operating Co. V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0774: Stonebridge Operating Co. V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 2006-98 & 2006-121
Appeal No. 0687: Sandbar Oil & Gas V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0687: Sandbar Oil & Gas V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 2000-51 & 2000-52
Appeal No. 0688: Sandbar Oil & Gas V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0688: Sandbar Oil & Gas V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 2000-51 & 2000-52
Appeal No. 0697: Halwell Company, Inc. V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0697: Halwell Company, Inc. V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 2000-153
Appeal No. 0685: G-R Contracting, Inc. V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0685: G-R Contracting, Inc. V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 3000-22
Appeal No. 0698: Bt Energy Corporation V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0698: Bt Energy Corporation V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 2000-154
Appeal No. 0692: Halwell Company, Inc. V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0692: Halwell Company, Inc. V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Letter, re: Han No. 1
Appeal No. 0691: B T Energy Corp., Inc. V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0691: B T Energy Corp., Inc. V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 2000-88 & Chief's Order 2000-90
Appeal No. 0696: Halwell Company, Inc. V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0696: Halwell Company, Inc. V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 2000-125
Appeal No. 0690: B T Energy Corp., Inc. V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0690: B T Energy Corp., Inc. V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 2000-88 & Chief's Order 2000-90
Appeal No. 0673: H & D Drilling V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0673: H & D Drilling V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Orders 99-115 & 99-116
Appeal No. 0672: H & D Drilling V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0672: H & D Drilling V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Orders 99-115 & 99-116
Expert Witnesses, Kimberly M. Miles
Proving The Nexus Between A Criminal Defendant And The Criminal Conducts Of Subordinates And Associates In War Crimes Charges Pursuant To Article 4 Of The Ictr, Richard Davies
War Crimes Memoranda
No abstract provided.
A Comparative Analysis Of National Rules In The United States, The United Kingdom And Canada On The Ethical Duties Of A Judge, Prosecutor And Defense Counsel On Making Commentary To The Press In An Ongoing Case, Bradley M.J. Kellogg
War Crimes Memoranda
No abstract provided.
Is Evidence Of Rape Relevant And Therefore Admissible Where Genocide, But Not Crimes Against Humanity (Rape), Has Been Charged In An Indictment?, Kathleen Cavanaugh
Is Evidence Of Rape Relevant And Therefore Admissible Where Genocide, But Not Crimes Against Humanity (Rape), Has Been Charged In An Indictment?, Kathleen Cavanaugh
War Crimes Memoranda
No abstract provided.
The Concept Of Withdrawal From A Conspiracy, Tammy Lopez
The Concept Of Withdrawal From A Conspiracy, Tammy Lopez
War Crimes Memoranda
No abstract provided.
The Degree Of Corroboration Required For A Witness’ Testimony To Be Considered Credible By The Trial Chamber., Patricia Wedding
The Degree Of Corroboration Required For A Witness’ Testimony To Be Considered Credible By The Trial Chamber., Patricia Wedding
War Crimes Memoranda
No abstract provided.
The Exercise Of Universal Jurisdiction By Belgium Over Ictr Targets, Julia J. Carabillo
The Exercise Of Universal Jurisdiction By Belgium Over Ictr Targets, Julia J. Carabillo
War Crimes Memoranda
No abstract provided.
Undue Delay, Kelly M. Before
The Balancing Of The Rights Of The Accused Against The Rights Of A Witness In Regard To Anonymous Testimony., Anna M. Haughton
The Balancing Of The Rights Of The Accused Against The Rights Of A Witness In Regard To Anonymous Testimony., Anna M. Haughton
War Crimes Memoranda
No abstract provided.
Superior Responsibility Absent The Subordinate Being Formally Charged, Chad Frederick Affsa
Superior Responsibility Absent The Subordinate Being Formally Charged, Chad Frederick Affsa
War Crimes Memoranda
No abstract provided.
Surrender Of Accused By Domestic States To The Ictr, Agnes Escurel
Surrender Of Accused By Domestic States To The Ictr, Agnes Escurel
War Crimes Memoranda
No abstract provided.
The Decision By The Appeals Chamber In Jelisić Not To Remit The Case For Trial After Reversing A Mid-Trial Acquittal, Gregory P. Lombardi
The Decision By The Appeals Chamber In Jelisić Not To Remit The Case For Trial After Reversing A Mid-Trial Acquittal, Gregory P. Lombardi
War Crimes Memoranda
No abstract provided.
Irreconcilable Differences: Congressional Treatment Of Internet Service Providers As Speakers, Raymond Shih Ray Ku
Irreconcilable Differences: Congressional Treatment Of Internet Service Providers As Speakers, Raymond Shih Ray Ku
Faculty Publications
This Article argues that under the CDA and OCILLA, Congress adopted facially inconsistent approaches towards ISP liability for expression. Nonetheless, despite the overt differences, it is possible to discern an underlying principle for determining when ISPs should be considered speakers that reconciles this inconsistency. Put simply, the CDA and OCILLA support an approach toward determining when ISPs are speakers that focuses on whether an ISP exercises editorial control over its network. This approach is evidenced by the fact that both statutes recognize that ISPs are able to exercise editorial control over any and all content on their networks, and both …
Character Evidence, Paul C. Giannelli
Judicial Supermajorities And The Validity Of Statutes: How Mapp Became A Fourth Amendment Landmark Instead Of A First Amendment Footnote, Jonathan L. Entin
Judicial Supermajorities And The Validity Of Statutes: How Mapp Became A Fourth Amendment Landmark Instead Of A First Amendment Footnote, Jonathan L. Entin
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
“Other Acts” Evidence: Part Ii, Paul C. Giannelli
“Other Acts” Evidence: Part Ii, Paul C. Giannelli
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
The International Criminal Court's Jurisdiction Over The Nationals Of Non - Party States: A Critique Of The U.S. Position, Michael P. Scharf
The International Criminal Court's Jurisdiction Over The Nationals Of Non - Party States: A Critique Of The U.S. Position, Michael P. Scharf
Faculty Publications
This article analyzes the validity of the U.S. argument against the ICC's jurisdiction over the nationals of non-party states in the context of historic precedent and the principles underlying international criminal jurisdiction, and demonstrates that it is not the jurisdiction of the ICC over the nationals of non-party states, but the U.S. government's legal argument, which rests on shaky foundations. The article also highlights the potential unintended repercussions of the current U.S. legal position. This analysis could have a substantial bearing on the approach the United States takes to the Rome Statute, for it indicates that the United States actually …
Hair Comparison Evidence, Paul C. Giannelli
Hair Comparison Evidence, Paul C. Giannelli
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.