Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- International Law (3)
- AJIL (2)
- American Journal of International Law (2)
- Debt relief (2)
- International and municipal law (2)
-
- International law (2)
- Jus ad bellum (2)
- Refugees (2)
- The Middle East (2)
- Treaties (2)
- AEPS (1)
- Administrative Law (1)
- Alien Tort Claims Act (United States) (1)
- Alternative dispute resolution (1)
- American Society of International Law Proceedings (1)
- Antarctic (1)
- Arab countries (1)
- Arbitration (1)
- Arbitration International (1)
- Arbitration friendliness (1)
- Arctic (1)
- Arctic council (1)
- Armed conflict (1)
- Asia (1)
- Bribery--Law and legislation (1)
- Caroline (1)
- Civilian war casualties (1)
- Climate Change (1)
- Climate change (1)
- Collective security (1)
Articles 31 - 32 of 32
Full-Text Articles in Law
Unintended Agency Problems: How International Bureaucracies Are Built And Empowered, Anu Bradford, Stavros Gadinis, Katerina Linos
Unintended Agency Problems: How International Bureaucracies Are Built And Empowered, Anu Bradford, Stavros Gadinis, Katerina Linos
Faculty Scholarship
The ground underneath the entire liberal international order is rapidly shifting. Institutions as diverse as the European Union, International Monetary Fund, United Nations, and World Trade Organization are under major threat. These institutions reflect decades of political investments in a world order where institutionalized cooperation was considered an essential cornerstone for peace and prosperity. Going beyond the politics of the day, this Article argues that the seeds of today’s discontent with the international order were in fact sown back when these institutions were first created. We show how states initially design international institutions with features that later haunt them in …
What Does It Mean To Be ‘Pro-Arbitration’?, George A. Bermann
What Does It Mean To Be ‘Pro-Arbitration’?, George A. Bermann
Faculty Scholarship
International arbitration commentators commonly ask of a proposed policy or practice whether it is ‘pro-’ or ‘anti-arbitration’. Framing the question that way presupposes a shared understanding of what does or does not make a policy or practice arbitration-friendly. In truth, the ways in which policies or practices may affect international arbitration’s well-being are manifold. They may even distinctly serve international arbitration’s well-being in some respects while equally distinctly disserving it in others. It behooves those who take international; arbitration’s well-being seriously to acknowledge the multiplicity of metrics for identifying what is ‘pro-’ and what is ‘anti-arbitration’ and to seek the …