Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (79)
- Marquette University Law School (76)
- Selected Works (73)
- Fordham Law School (66)
- The University of Akron (48)
-
- American University Washington College of Law (40)
- Boston University School of Law (40)
- University of Georgia School of Law (39)
- SJ Quinney College of Law, University of Utah (36)
- SelectedWorks (29)
- New York Law School (25)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (23)
- University of New Hampshire (20)
- Chicago-Kent College of Law (18)
- University of Richmond (18)
- BLR (16)
- The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law (15)
- University of Baltimore Law (14)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (13)
- University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School (11)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (11)
- Pepperdine University (10)
- Seattle University School of Law (10)
- Southern Methodist University (9)
- University of Michigan Law School (9)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (9)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (8)
- University of Colorado Law School (8)
- University of Pittsburgh School of Law (8)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (7)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Northwestern Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property (75)
- Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review (74)
- Faculty Scholarship (67)
- Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal (61)
- Utah Law Faculty Scholarship (35)
-
- All Faculty Scholarship (33)
- Akron Intellectual Property Journal (27)
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law (24)
- ExpressO (16)
- Akron Law Review (15)
- Articles & Chapters (15)
- American University Law Review (14)
- Scholarly Works (14)
- Faculty Publications (13)
- Scholarly Articles (13)
- Articles (12)
- Daniel Harris Brean (11)
- Law Faculty Publications (11)
- Law Faculty Scholarship (11)
- Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications (11)
- Seattle University Law Review (10)
- Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals (9)
- Chicago-Kent Journal of Intellectual Property (9)
- Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters (9)
- Michael Risch (9)
- Michigan Law Review (9)
- Journal Articles (8)
- RISK: Health, Safety & Environment (1990-2002) (8)
- Touro Law Review (8)
- Amicus Briefs (7)
Articles 901 - 920 of 920
Full-Text Articles in Law
The Copyright Monopoly After Sony Corp. Of America V. Universal City Studios, Inc.
The Copyright Monopoly After Sony Corp. Of America V. Universal City Studios, Inc.
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
An Economic Analysis Of Royalty Terms In Patent Licenses, Michael J. Meurer
An Economic Analysis Of Royalty Terms In Patent Licenses, Michael J. Meurer
Faculty Scholarship
Efficient exploitation of a patent often requires patentees to license users of their inventions. The courts, on the other hand, have proscribed many forms of license agreements and discouraged patent licensing in general, thereby diminishing the efficacy of the patent system as a stimulus to R & D. This negative attitude is attributable to fears that licensing will be used to protect invalid patents and secure illegitimate extensions of monopoly power. Part I of this Note reviews judicial treatment of certain royalty terms in patent licenses, describing the restraints the courts have imposed on the freedom of patentees to license …
General Motors Corporation V. Devex Corp., Lewis F. Powell Jr.
General Motors Corporation V. Devex Corp., Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
Notes On Misc Re Contract - 1981, Wendy J. Gordon
Notes On Misc Re Contract - 1981, Wendy J. Gordon
Scholarship Chronologically
Once there is a patent, voluntarily-accepted user restrictions may not be enforceable. Or, at least, an attempt on the patentee's part to condition access of certain types on obtaining such restrictions, may be impossible. See 30 BNA PTCJ 104 (5/30/85)(Restrictions voided on availability of deposited yeast strains.) Filed under Yeast case.
Lecture Draft On Sensory Recall Device - 1980, Wendy J. Gordon
Lecture Draft On Sensory Recall Device - 1980, Wendy J. Gordon
Scholarship Chronologically
Perception is a bodily function. The brain “sees” according to the orders which the optic nerve relays from its position at the back of the eye. Similarly, it is the brain which also "hears." As we know from our dreaming and our remembering, neither eye nor ear is indispensable to having the sensations of seeing and hearing.
Dawson Chemical Co. V. Rohm & Haas Co., Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Dawson Chemical Co. V. Rohm & Haas Co., Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
Aronson V. Quick Point Pencil Company, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Aronson V. Quick Point Pencil Company, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
United States V. Glaxo Group Ltd., Lewis F. Powell Jr.
United States V. Glaxo Group Ltd., Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
Deepsouth Packing Co. V. Laitram Corp., Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Deepsouth Packing Co. V. Laitram Corp., Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
"Related" Claims Of Unfair Competition And Patent Infringement - River Brand Rice Mills, Inc. V. General Foods Corp.
Maryland Law Review
No abstract provided.
Tying Arrangement With Trademark As The Tying Item Is Not A Per Se Violation Of The Antitrust Laws-Susser V. Carvel Corp., Michigan Law Review
Tying Arrangement With Trademark As The Tying Item Is Not A Per Se Violation Of The Antitrust Laws-Susser V. Carvel Corp., Michigan Law Review
Michigan Law Review
Several independent franchised soft ice-cream outlets brought suit for treble damages against Carvel Corporation, the franchising company, alleging that the contract between them constituted an illegal tying arrangement in violation of section 3 of the Clayton Act and sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act. The contract bound the dealers to purchase from Carvel-appointed suppliers all commodities sold as part of the retail dairy composite. Plaintiffs stipulated that they would rely on per se violations at trial. The district court found that the plaintiffs had failed to show the alleged violations and, in any case, the defendant had proved …
Know-How Licensing And The Antitrust Laws, David R. Macdonald
Know-How Licensing And The Antitrust Laws, David R. Macdonald
Michigan Law Review
The purpose of this article is to re-analyze the present antitrust status of know-how licensing for the purpose of clarifying the extent of the protection which the exploiter of know-how may accord himself without abusing the public interest in unfettered competition.
Patents-Procedure-Applicability Of Invention Secrecy Act Where Government Use Of Invention Is Authorized, Thomas G. Dignan Jr.
Patents-Procedure-Applicability Of Invention Secrecy Act Where Government Use Of Invention Is Authorized, Thomas G. Dignan Jr.
Michigan Law Review
After extended negotiations, plaintiff entered into a contract with the United States for the development of a new model "hemisphere sight," a mock-up of which plaintiff had previously revealed to the Air Force. Acting upon a request by the Air Force, the Commissioner of Patents issued a secrecy order on the gun sight pursuant to provisions of the Invention Secrecy Act, thus preventing the issuance of a patent to the plaintiff. In order for the United States to have a second source of supply for the sights, the plaintiff revealed its engineering information to another manufacturer upon governmental request to …
Enforcement Of Intellectual Property Rights, Albert R. Teare
Enforcement Of Intellectual Property Rights, Albert R. Teare
Cleveland State Law Review
Wrongful use or appropriation of the property of another is a tort. The owner of a patent has a remedy by civil action for infringement of his patent, and the District Courts of the United States have original jurisdiction of any civil action arising under any act of Congress relating to patents, trademarks and copyrights.
Vaughan: The United States Patent System, Arthur M. Smith
Vaughan: The United States Patent System, Arthur M. Smith
Michigan Law Review
A Review of The United States Patent System. By Floyd L. Vaughan.
Regulation Of Business - Patents - Effect Of Section 271 On The Doctrine Of Contributory Infringement, Robert W. Steele S.Ed.
Regulation Of Business - Patents - Effect Of Section 271 On The Doctrine Of Contributory Infringement, Robert W. Steele S.Ed.
Michigan Law Review
Prior to 1952 the judiciary had sole control of questions involving the infringement of patents. The courts evolved their own concepts and rules of interpretation without legislative guidance. The Patent Act of 1952 marked a radical departure from this policy. Section 271 of the new patent act is an attempt on the part of Congress to codify the doctrine of contributory infringement. Prior to the enactment of this section there was considerable doubt as to the scope of this doctrine and even as to its continued existence. Supreme Court recognition of the defense of patent misuse appears to have diluted …
Patents - The Changing Standard Of Patentable Invention: Confusion Compounded, John M. Webb S.Ed.
Patents - The Changing Standard Of Patentable Invention: Confusion Compounded, John M. Webb S.Ed.
Michigan Law Review
In Lyon v. Bausch and Lomb Optical Co., Judge Learned Hand carefully analyzed the problem and took the position that Congress intended to modify the standard then applied by the Supreme Court and revive that used twenty-five years ago. He stated that under recent Supreme Court decisions he would be compelled to find the patent invalid, but upheld it on the basis of his interpretation of the new statute. This comment is directed not only to Judge Hand's interpretation, but also to the effect that his decision has had, and may be expected to have in the future, both …
Federal Employee Invention Rights - Time To Legislate, Marcus B. Finnegan, Richard W. Pogue
Federal Employee Invention Rights - Time To Legislate, Marcus B. Finnegan, Richard W. Pogue
Michigan Law Review
It is the purpose of this article to review judicial standards applicable to the determination of rights in inventions made by employees of the federal government, to note statutory provisions affecting the problem, to examine the content and effect of the present Executive program for determining such rights, to review and evaluate two fundamental and conflicting theories in this field, and to propose legislation establishing appropriate standards and procedures. This topic is believed to have general interest because, in addition to the urgencies suggested above, the problem touches some of the basic legal philosophy underlying the United States patent system.
The Doctrine Of Misuse Of Patent
Expensive Futility Of The United States Trade Mark Statute, Edward S. Rogers
Expensive Futility Of The United States Trade Mark Statute, Edward S. Rogers
Michigan Law Review
Every lawyer of much experience knows the client who tip-toes into his office, closes the door carefully, and with a great show of secrecy announces that he has discovered or invented the best name for a soda cracker, a patent medicine, a soft drink, or what not, that human ingenuity ever conceived. He wants it protected before any one can steal it from him. He wants it "Copyrighted." This is the expression most commonly used. He seems to be under the impression that some incantation can be performed by means of which he will be able to secure to himself …