Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Chicago-Kent College of Law (57)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (23)
- Marquette University Law School (22)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (21)
- American University Washington College of Law (16)
-
- Fordham Law School (16)
- University of Michigan Law School (15)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (14)
- University of Georgia School of Law (12)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (12)
- William & Mary Law School (12)
- Mitchell Hamline School of Law (10)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (10)
- Pepperdine University (9)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (9)
- Cleveland State University (8)
- Clemson University (5)
- Pace University (5)
- University of Maine School of Law (5)
- University of Miami Law School (5)
- SJ Quinney College of Law, University of Utah (4)
- Seattle University School of Law (4)
- The University of Akron (4)
- University of New Hampshire (4)
- University of Washington School of Law (4)
- Georgia State University College of Law (3)
- Notre Dame Law School (3)
- University of Kentucky (3)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (3)
- University of San Diego (3)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Chicago-Kent Journal of Intellectual Property (50)
- Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal (16)
- Indiana Law Journal (16)
- Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review (16)
- Michigan Law Review (13)
-
- Villanova Law Review (12)
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law (11)
- Vanderbilt Law Review (11)
- Cybaris® (10)
- William & Mary Law Review (9)
- Intellectual Property Brief (8)
- Journal of Business & Technology Law (8)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (8)
- Chicago-Kent Law Review (7)
- Cleveland State Law Review (7)
- Marquette Intellectual Property & Innovation Law Review (6)
- Northwestern Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property (6)
- Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law (6)
- Journal of the Patent and Trademark Resource Center Association (5)
- Maine Law Review (5)
- The Journal of Business, Entrepreneurship & the Law (5)
- University of Miami Law Review (5)
- Akron Law Review (4)
- American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law (4)
- Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies (4)
- Maryland Law Review (4)
- Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law (4)
- American University Law Review (3)
- Georgia State University Law Review (3)
- IP Theory (3)
Articles 331 - 343 of 343
Full-Text Articles in Law
Concrete Forms Of Intellectual Property, Robert J. Fay
Concrete Forms Of Intellectual Property, Robert J. Fay
Cleveland State Law Review
The field of intellectual property as treated in this paper encompasses mental products of industrial importance: inventions or discoveries, literary or artistic works, trade secrets,and distinguishing trademarks or trade names used in commerce. Each of these is characterized by mental activity followed by embodiment in some concrete form. Protection in a measure for the originator is found both in the statutes and in common law.
Restrictions On Use Of Intellectual Property Rights, Harold S. Meyer
Restrictions On Use Of Intellectual Property Rights, Harold S. Meyer
Cleveland State Law Review
Intellectual property rights are generally considered to include patents, copyrights, and ownership of unpublished technical data or "know-how," and sometimes trademarks. In spite of the basic differences in character between trademarkmrights and the others, all these rights are often dealt with as a group, particularly in Europe, where they are known collectively as industrial property rights.
Problems In Joint Ownership Of Patents, Harrington A. Lackey
Problems In Joint Ownership Of Patents, Harrington A. Lackey
Vanderbilt Law Review
In that area of the law where rights in the products of mental conception are created, transferred and litigated, the general practitioner is often bewildered by the challenge to identify such rights with legal principles familiar to him. Although certain of these rights have arisen and are protected under our common law, patent rights are creatures of federal statutes authorized under our Constitution. Moreover, patents are identified as property, and under the 1952 Patent Act, they have been further classified as personal property. Here the confusion begins.
What Is Prior Art, Virgil E. Woodcock
Inventors And Their Relations With Others, Howard I. Forman
Inventors And Their Relations With Others, Howard I. Forman
Villanova Law Review
No abstract provided.
Security Inventions: Compensation Under Patent And Atomic Energy Acts
Security Inventions: Compensation Under Patent And Atomic Energy Acts
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Consent Decrees And Res Judicata
Design Piracy, Maurice A. Weikart
Judgments - Propriety Of Finding That A Nonparty Conducted The Defense, David N. Mills
Judgments - Propriety Of Finding That A Nonparty Conducted The Defense, David N. Mills
Michigan Law Review
A patent infringement suit against a distributor was dismissed on the ground that plaintiff's patents were invalid. A finding was incorporated in the judgment that the defense had been "openly and avowedly conducted" by the manufacturer of the article distributed by defendant. Plaintiff objected that the finding "on its face would be a valid estoppel" in case plaintiff later wished to sue the manufacturer in a separate suit. Held, that plaintiff was entitled to have the finding deleted from the judgment since the finding was not necessary to a disposition of the issues between plaintiff and defendant. Minneapolis- Honeywell …
Rescission - Constructive Trusts - Tracing Misappropriated Funds, Eugene T. Kinder
Rescission - Constructive Trusts - Tracing Misappropriated Funds, Eugene T. Kinder
Michigan Law Review
Defendant, president of plaintiff corporation, misappropriated over $1,000,000 in corporate funds, investing $79,000 thereof in government bonds. With the proceeds from these bonds, defendant set up two corporations, all the capital stock of which was owned by defendant's son and was purchased with plaintiff's money. One Greenslade was hired by defendant, and paid with a part of the misappropriated funds, to experiment with locomotive staybolt testing devices. As a result of the experimentation, Greenslade invented and patented several devices, transferring ownership thereof to one of the two corporations. In a prior action, brought without knowledge of the disposition of the …
Patents-Reissues-Intervening Rights
Treaties-Scope Of Treaty--Making Power--When Treaties Are Self-Executing
Treaties-Scope Of Treaty--Making Power--When Treaties Are Self-Executing
Michigan Law Review
The scope of the treaty-making power, and the considerations that govern in determining when a treaty is self-executing and when it requires subsequent legislation to make its terms effective, received an interesting discussion in a recent case decided in the United States District Court of the District of Maryland.
Curb-Stone Patent Opinions, Dwight B. Cheever
Curb-Stone Patent Opinions, Dwight B. Cheever
Michigan Law Review
Having been asked almost every day for the last nine years for offhand-commonly called curb-stone-opinions on one or more of certain very elementary propositions in Patent Law, it has occurred to me that perhaps a discussion of some of these questions would be of more practical value to the readers of this magazine than a comprehensive discussion of a more elaborate subject.