Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- St. Mary’s Law Journal (27)
- St. Mary’s University School of Law (26)
- Texas (7)
- Mexico (6)
- North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) (6)
-
- Jr. (4)
- Texas Constitution (3)
- Texas Supreme Court (3)
- Actual damages (2)
- American Rule (2)
- Arbitration (2)
- Articles of Confederation (2)
- Civil Code of the RSFSR (2)
- Cruel and unusual punishment (2)
- Dallas Court of Appeals (2)
- Elections (2)
- Export subsidies (2)
- Fact witnesses (2)
- Factual insufficiency (2)
- Fourteenth Amendment (2)
- General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) (2)
- Inc. (2)
- Judicial notice (2)
- Jury charge (2)
- Legal insufficiency (2)
- Non-tariff barriers (2)
- Remittitur (2)
- Sanctions (2)
- Student Comment (2)
- Summary judgment (2)
- Publication Type
Articles 31 - 39 of 39
Full-Text Articles in Law
Judging In The Quiet Of The Storm., Shirley S. Abrahamson
Judging In The Quiet Of The Storm., Shirley S. Abrahamson
St. Mary's Law Journal
Justice Benjamin Cardozo evaluates the elements he believes motivate judges in deciding cases in The Nature of the Judicial Process. Judge Cardozo focuses primarily on common-law courts deciding common-law cases. Although state-court dockets cover a wider variety of topics today and the legal landscape has changed, The Nature of the Judicial Process remains influential. The basis of Judge Cardozo’s approach is to first extract principles from past cases and apply them to new fact situations. Cardozo refers to this process as the method of philosophy. As precedent cannot readily solve all new disputes, this process may require judges select from …
Agricultural Trade Wars: A Threat To The Gatt And Global Free Trade., Thomas J. Schoenbaum
Agricultural Trade Wars: A Threat To The Gatt And Global Free Trade., Thomas J. Schoenbaum
St. Mary's Law Journal
Agriculture, today, is the center of a set of multi-dimensional international controversies and crises. International agricultural strife threatens the future of the global free-trade system. This strife soured relations between the United States and its principal allies and trading partners: Canada, the European Community (EC), and Japan. The agricultural trade controversy is at the heart of the bitter stalemate of the Uruguay Round of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) negotiations. The deadlock over farm trade called into question the very future of the GATT as an international organization. Controversies over agriculture also endanger approval of the recently …
Revisiting Standards Of Review In Civil Appeals., W. Wendell Hall
Revisiting Standards Of Review In Civil Appeals., W. Wendell Hall
St. Mary's Law Journal
Applying and defining the accurate standard of review determines how likely an appeal will be successful. While the proper standard of review may be easy to identify, applying the standard of review to a case is often problematic. The standards define the interactions between trial and appellate courts by distributing the power of review throughout the judicial branch. The standards of review also limit a court’s authority to determine an error by a trial court, and whether the error warrants reversal. The standard sets the requirements of substantive law and provides a means for appellate judges to weigh arguments. This …
Transracial Adoption In Texas: Should The Best Interests Standard Be Color-Blind., Jo Beth Eubanks
Transracial Adoption In Texas: Should The Best Interests Standard Be Color-Blind., Jo Beth Eubanks
St. Mary's Law Journal
Legislative amendments must go further than limiting race from being a primary factor in adoptions; amendments must eliminate race as an acceptable factor. Diverging opinions of “race matching” in foster care and adoption exist. Administrative policies regulating adoption hold that same-race placement, between the adoptive parent and child, is a primary consideration when awarding custody in Texas. Basing child placement on the race or ethnicity of the parties involved raises serious constitutional concerns. The best interest standard is the predominant method in determining child placement, for both custody and adoption proceedings. The premise of the best interest standard is prioritization …
Lawyer-Bashing: It's Time To Turn The Tide Perspective., Ward Blacklock
Lawyer-Bashing: It's Time To Turn The Tide Perspective., Ward Blacklock
St. Mary's Law Journal
Abstract Forthcoming.
Tending The Bar In Texas: Alcoholism As A Mitigating Factor In Attorney Discipline., Patricia Sue Heil
Tending The Bar In Texas: Alcoholism As A Mitigating Factor In Attorney Discipline., Patricia Sue Heil
St. Mary's Law Journal
This Comment describes the nature and scope of alcoholism and chemical dependency in the legal profession. It reviews the current state of the law regarding alcoholism as a mitigating factor in attorney discipline. Addictive illnesses manifest themselves in ways which leave afflicted attorneys unable to practice law in accordance with professional rules of conduct. The majority of attorney-discipline cases involve alcoholism or chemical dependency. An attorney whose illness remains untreated will likely become the subject of grievance-committee investigations. For disciplinary cases involving alcoholism, a suggested analysis includes establishing a nexus between illness and misconduct. Additionally, it includes a causal connection …
Jurors May Not Pose Written Questions To Witnesses In Criminal Cases., Mark C. Robertson Ii
Jurors May Not Pose Written Questions To Witnesses In Criminal Cases., Mark C. Robertson Ii
St. Mary's Law Journal
Abstract Forthcoming.
A License To Kill: The Categorical Exemption Of The Mentally Retarded From The Death Penalty., David L. Rumley
A License To Kill: The Categorical Exemption Of The Mentally Retarded From The Death Penalty., David L. Rumley
St. Mary's Law Journal
This Comment will show there is no merit to the argument the Eighth Amendment prohibits the imposition of capital punishment on all persons considered mentally retarded. This Comment begins with an overview of the historical treatment of mental disabilities, articulating the levels of mental deficiency required for exculpation of criminal responsibility. Next, this Comment discusses the characteristics of persons with mental retardation. This Comment will also discuss the recently enacted statutes’ use of I.Q. tests for determinations of mental retardation. In analyzing these statutes, it becomes apparent a person’s I.Q. should not be prima-facie proof of mental retardation, although state …
Congressional Reform: Can Term Limitations Close The Door On Political Careerism., Julia C. Wommack
Congressional Reform: Can Term Limitations Close The Door On Political Careerism., Julia C. Wommack
St. Mary's Law Journal
Addressing Congressional woes requires reform. Entrenched incumbency is a detriment to the legislative system. Although the enactment of initiatives restricting Congressional terms limits signal voters agree, better alternatives exist. The only prerequisites found in the Constitution for serving in Congress are age, residency, and citizenship. While the twenty-second amendment proscribes the presidential office limit maximum as two terms, no such limitations exist for a congressman or congresswoman. Sitting incumbents have substantial advantages over their challengers. Incumbents success ratio exceeds 80% in Senate races and is approximately 90% for elections in the House of Representatives. Congressional term limitations attempt to eliminate …