Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Immigration (20)
- Deportation (10)
- Asylum (9)
- Aliens (8)
- Immigration reform (5)
-
- Administrative law (4)
- Illegal immigrants (4)
- Refugee (4)
- Citizenship (3)
- Detention of persons (3)
- Emigration (3)
- Government regulation (3)
- History (3)
- Immigration law (3)
- Administrative Law (2)
- Alien (2)
- Constitutional Law (2)
- Constitutional law (2)
- Criminal law (2)
- Department of Homeland Security (2)
- Detention (2)
- Development (2)
- Donald Trump (2)
- Due process of law (2)
- Gender (2)
- Human rights (2)
- Human trafficking (2)
- Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act (2)
- Illegal immigration (2)
- Immigrant (2)
Articles 31 - 39 of 39
Full-Text Articles in Law
Striking A Balance Among Illegal Aliens, The Ina, And The Nlra: Sure-Tan V. Nlrb, Carl M. Howard
Striking A Balance Among Illegal Aliens, The Ina, And The Nlra: Sure-Tan V. Nlrb, Carl M. Howard
Pepperdine Law Review
Since 1943, the National Labor Relations Board has extended rights guaranteed to employees under the National Labor Relations Act to illegal aliens. In Sure-Tan v. NLRB, the United States Supreme Court for the first time reviewed this practice, approving it and noting that reporting illegal alien employees to the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) might constitute an unfair labor practice. Awarding a remedy of back pay was, however, improper as speculative. The author examines the Supreme Court's analysis of the decision and explores its future impact.
Alienating Sham Marriages For Tougher Immigration Penalties: Congress Enacts The Marriage Fraud Act, Karen L. Rae
Alienating Sham Marriages For Tougher Immigration Penalties: Congress Enacts The Marriage Fraud Act, Karen L. Rae
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Municipal And State Sanctuary Declarations: Innocuous Symbolism Or Improper Dictates?, Jorge L. Carro
Municipal And State Sanctuary Declarations: Innocuous Symbolism Or Improper Dictates?, Jorge L. Carro
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Children Of A Lesser God: Should The Fourteenth Amendment Be Altered Or Repealed To Deny Automatic Citizenship Rights And Privileges To American Born Children Of Illegal Aliens?, Robert J. Shulman
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Testing The Borders: The Boundaries Of State And Local Power To Regulate Illegal Immigration , Brittney M. Lane
Testing The Borders: The Boundaries Of State And Local Power To Regulate Illegal Immigration , Brittney M. Lane
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Seeking Asylum For Former Child Soldiers And Victims Of Human Trafficking, Tina Javaherian
Seeking Asylum For Former Child Soldiers And Victims Of Human Trafficking, Tina Javaherian
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
An End To The Violence: Justifying Gender As A "Particular Social Group", Suzanne Sidun
An End To The Violence: Justifying Gender As A "Particular Social Group", Suzanne Sidun
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Fate Of "Unremovable" Aliens Before And After September 11, 2001: The Supreme Court's Presumptive Six-Month Limit To Post-Removal-Period Detention, Megan Peitzke
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
We Don't Need To See Them Cry: Eliminating The Subjective Apprehension Element Of The Well-Founded Fear Analysis For Child Refugee Applicants, Bridgette A. Carr
We Don't Need To See Them Cry: Eliminating The Subjective Apprehension Element Of The Well-Founded Fear Analysis For Child Refugee Applicants, Bridgette A. Carr
Pepperdine Law Review
This article addresses a barrier to effective protection faced by child refugee applicants. Currently all refugee applicants, including infants, are required to satisfy two elements of well-founded fear. All applicants must prove that they face an objective risk of persecution and that they subjectively fear this risk. But children often cannot exhibit the subject apprehension element of the test. As a result, UNHCR, and the U.S and Canadian governments issued guidelines that encourage decision makers to accept other evidence to prove a child's subjective apprehension when the child is unable to exhibit fear. However, this approach does not go far …