Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- William & Mary Law School (27)
- Seattle University School of Law (10)
- American University Washington College of Law (9)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (7)
- Pepperdine University (7)
-
- Cleveland State University (6)
- Brigham Young University Law School (5)
- SJ Quinney College of Law, University of Utah (5)
- St. John's University School of Law (4)
- The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law (4)
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock William H. Bowen School of Law (4)
- University of Cincinnati College of Law (4)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (4)
- Florida International University College of Law (3)
- Fordham Law School (3)
- Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School (3)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (3)
- University of Arkansas, Fayetteville (3)
- University of Maine School of Law (3)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (3)
- University of Michigan Law School (3)
- Brooklyn Law School (2)
- Cornell University Law School (2)
- New York Law School (2)
- Notre Dame Law School (2)
- Pace University (2)
- Roger Williams University (2)
- St. Mary's University (2)
- University of Georgia School of Law (2)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (2)
- Keyword
-
- First Amendment (35)
- Freedom of Speech (16)
- United States Constitution 1st Amendment (16)
- Constitutional Law (8)
- First amendment (8)
-
- Supreme Court (8)
- Freedom of speech (7)
- Free Speech (6)
- Free speech (6)
- Social media (6)
- Constitution (5)
- Speech (5)
- Establishment Clause (4)
- Privacy (4)
- Religion (4)
- Twitter (4)
- United States Constitution. 1st Amendment (4)
- Abortion (3)
- Disinformation (3)
- Employment Discrimination (3)
- Facebook (3)
- Freedom of expression (3)
- Internet (3)
- Journalism (3)
- Right to Bear Arms (3)
- 19th Amendment (2)
- Anti-SLAPP (2)
- COVID-19 (2)
- Censorship (2)
- Civil rights (2)
- Publication
-
- William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal (16)
- Seattle University Law Review (9)
- American University Law Review (7)
- Indiana Law Journal (7)
- William & Mary Journal of Race, Gender, and Social Justice (6)
-
- Cleveland State Law Review (5)
- Pepperdine Law Review (5)
- Utah Law Review (5)
- BYU Law Review (4)
- Catholic University Journal of Law and Technology (4)
- St. John's Law Review (4)
- William & Mary Law Review (4)
- Arkansas Law Review (3)
- FIU Law Review (3)
- Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review (3)
- Maine Law Review (3)
- Maryland Law Review (3)
- Touro Law Review (3)
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review (3)
- University of Cincinnati Law Review (3)
- Washington and Lee Journal of Civil Rights and Social Justice (3)
- Cornell Law Review (2)
- Fordham Law Review (2)
- Georgia Law Review (2)
- Michigan Law Review (2)
- NYLS Law Review (2)
- Nevada Law Journal (2)
- Notre Dame Law Review (2)
- Roger Williams University Law Review (2)
- St. Mary's Law Journal (2)
Articles 151 - 153 of 153
Full-Text Articles in Law
Privacy, Eavesdropping, And Wiretapping Across The United States: Reasonable Expectation Of Privacy And Judicial Discretion, Carol M. Bast
Privacy, Eavesdropping, And Wiretapping Across The United States: Reasonable Expectation Of Privacy And Judicial Discretion, Carol M. Bast
Catholic University Journal of Law and Technology
One-party consent and all-party consent eavesdropping and wiretapping statutes are two broad pathways for legislation to deal with the problem of secret taping and some states protect conversation under state constitutions. Whether a conversation is protected against being taped as a private conversation is often gauged by the reasonable expectation of privacy standard. Judges in both all-party consent and one-party consent jurisdictions have had to use their leeway under the reasonable expectation of privacy standard to arrive at what at the time seemed to be the most appropriate solution, perhaps in doing so creating a case law exception.
Pre-Game Strategy For Long-Term Win: Using Trademark Registration And Right Of Publicity To Protect Esports Gamers, John Bat
Catholic University Journal of Law and Technology
The soaring popularity of esports across the globe has turned ultra-talented gamers into a blend of athlete and entertainer. The youthful esports ecosystem is exploding in growth, and the world is taking notice. But are the gamers who are eyeing professional play taking basic legal steps to develop and shield their brands, as well as bolster their collective negotiating leverage with teams, leagues, and miscellaneous entities? This note explores what features of an up-and-coming esports gamer might be worth protecting through a trademark and/or personality-rights schema, which in turn, could assist competitive gamers who are interested in developing their careers …
The Decade Of Democracy's Demise, James Sample
The Decade Of Democracy's Demise, James Sample
American University Law Review
No abstract provided.