Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Loyola University Chicago, School of Law (34)
- The Peter A. Allard School of Law (12)
- Barry University School of Law (7)
- Mitchell Hamline School of Law (5)
- Universitas Indonesia (5)
-
- University of Minnesota Law School (5)
- Seattle University School of Law (4)
- University of Georgia School of Law (4)
- Cleveland State University (3)
- University of Michigan Law School (3)
- University of Richmond (3)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (3)
- William & Mary Law School (3)
- American University Washington College of Law (2)
- Brigham Young University Law School (2)
- Brooklyn Law School (2)
- Pace University (2)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (2)
- Roger Williams University (2)
- St. John's University School of Law (2)
- University of Washington School of Law (2)
- Chicago-Kent College of Law (1)
- Concordia University St. Paul (1)
- DePaul University (1)
- Florida A&M University College of Law (1)
- Fordham Law School (1)
- Georgia State University College of Law (1)
- Golden Gate University School of Law (1)
- Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School (1)
- Marquette University Law School (1)
- Keyword
-
- Marriage (5)
- Children (4)
- Parent (4)
- Child abuse (3)
- Child custody (3)
-
- Child protection (3)
- Divorce (3)
- Family law (3)
- Gender and law (3)
- LGBTQ (3)
- 2019 (2)
- 32 (2)
- 4 (2)
- Adoption (2)
- Brown (2)
- Center (2)
- Child (2)
- Civ (2)
- Civil (2)
- DOMA (2)
- Damages (2)
- Dev (2)
- Development (2)
- Discrimination (2)
- Domestic (2)
- Domestic violence (2)
- Econ (2)
- Economic (2)
- Equal protection (2)
- Four (2)
- Publication
-
- Children's Legal Rights Journal (34)
- Canadian Journal of Family Law (12)
- Child and Family Law Journal (7)
- Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan (5)
- Minnesota Journal of Law & Inequality (5)
-
- Mitchell Hamline Law Review (5)
- Seattle University Law Review (3)
- University of Richmond Law Review (3)
- BYU Law Review (2)
- Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present) (2)
- Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law (2)
- Georgia Law Review (2)
- Journal of Civil Rights and Economic Development (2)
- Journal of Law and Health (2)
- Michigan Journal of Gender & Law (2)
- Pace Law Review (2)
- Roger Williams University Law Review (2)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (2)
- William & Mary Law Review (2)
- American Indian Law Journal (1)
- American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law (1)
- American University Law Review (1)
- Arkansas Law Review (1)
- Brooklyn Law Review (1)
- Buffalo Law Review (1)
- Chicago-Kent Law Review (1)
- Cleveland State Law Review (1)
- Concordia Law Review (1)
- DePaul Journal of Women, Gender and the Law (1)
- Florida A & M University Law Review (1)
Articles 121 - 129 of 129
Full-Text Articles in Law
America’S (D)Evolving Childcare Tax Laws, Shannon W. Mccormack
America’S (D)Evolving Childcare Tax Laws, Shannon W. Mccormack
Georgia Law Review
Proponents touted the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the
TCJA)—enacted in the twilight of 2017—by claiming it
would help American working families. But while the
TCJA expanded some benefits available to parents with
dependent children, these parental tax benefits may be
claimed regardless of whether or to what extent
childcare costs are incurred to work outside the home.
To help working parents with these (often significant)
costs, Congress might have turned to two other
mechanisms in the tax law—the “child and dependent
care credit” and the “dependent care exclusion.” While
these childcare tax benefits are only available to working
parents …
A Cure Worse Than The Disease? The Impact Of Removal On Children And Their Families, Vivek Sankaran, Christopher Church, Monique Mitchell
A Cure Worse Than The Disease? The Impact Of Removal On Children And Their Families, Vivek Sankaran, Christopher Church, Monique Mitchell
Marquette Law Review
Removing children from their parents is child welfare’s most drastic
intervention. Research clearly establishes the profound and irreparable
damage family separation can inflict on children and their parents. To ensure
that this intervention is only used when necessary, a complex web of state and
federal constitutional principles, statutes, administrative regulations, judicial
decisions, and agency policies govern the removal decision. Central to these
authorities is the presumption that a healthy and robust child welfare system
keeps families together, protects children from harm, and centers on the needs
of children and their parents.
Yet, research and practice—supported by administrative data—paint a
different …
Transparenthood, Sonia K. Katyal, Ilona M. Turner
Transparenthood, Sonia K. Katyal, Ilona M. Turner
Michigan Law Review
Despite the growing recognition of transgender rights in both law and culture, there is one area of law that has lagged behind: family law’s treatment of transgender parents. We perform an investigation of the way that transgender parents are treated in case law and discover striking results regarding the outcomes for transgender parents within the family court system. Despite significant gains for transgender plaintiffs in employment and other areas of law, the evidence reveals an array of ways in which the family court system has systematically alienated the rights and interests of transgender parents. In many cases involving custody or …
Schnedler V. Lee: Some (Re)Assembly Required, Victoria Johnson
Schnedler V. Lee: Some (Re)Assembly Required, Victoria Johnson
Oklahoma Law Review
No abstract provided.
Divorce, Domicile, And The Constitution, Mark Strasser
Divorce, Domicile, And The Constitution, Mark Strasser
Kentucky Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Pennsylvania’S Need For Permanency: An Argument In Support Of Workable Standards For Representing Children In Involuntary Termination Of Parental Rights Proceedings, Anne M. Bingaman
Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present)
In cases of child abuse and neglect, Pennsylvania’s dependency laws both empower courts to act to protect the child and offer opportunities to bolster the parent-child relationship. However, when courts determine that maintenance of the parent-child relationship is not in the child’s best interest, termination of parental rights proceedings play an essential role in freeing the child for adoption.
Pennsylvania’s General Assembly has recognized that termination proceedings are both a necessary mechanism for permanency and a significant intrusion in the life of a child. As a result, the General Assembly enacted 23 PA. CONST. STAT. § 2313(a), a provision in …
Faire Valoir Ses Droits À La Chambre De La Jeunesse : État Des Lieux Des Barrières Structurelles À L’Accès À La Justice Des Familles, Emmanuelle Bernheim, Marilyn Coupienne
Faire Valoir Ses Droits À La Chambre De La Jeunesse : État Des Lieux Des Barrières Structurelles À L’Accès À La Justice Des Familles, Emmanuelle Bernheim, Marilyn Coupienne
Canadian Journal of Family Law
S’il est convenu que l’intervention en protection de la jeunesse constitue en soi une atteinte aux droits fondamentaux des parents, il est souvent pris pour acquis que les droits des parents et des enfants s’opposent autour de notions telles que l’intérêt supérieur de l’enfant et le projet de vie permanent. Au Québec, dans un contexte où les mères vivant dans la pauvreté, et plus particulièrement les mères autochtones ou issues de minorités visibles, sont surreprésentées en protection de la jeunesse et où le nombre de dossiers judiciarisés a cru de 20% depuis les années 1990, il apparaît non seulement pertinent …
Relationally Speaking: The Implications Of Treating Embryos As Property In A Canadian Context, Kathleen Hammond
Relationally Speaking: The Implications Of Treating Embryos As Property In A Canadian Context, Kathleen Hammond
Canadian Journal of Family Law
In July 2018, the Ontario Superior Court, in S.H. v D.H., dealt with a dispute between a recently separated couple over a frozen embryo that the couple had created. In his judgment, Justice Del Frate stated that the embryo should be conceived of as property. This was the cause of uproar among feminist legal scholars who were concerned with the possible repercussions for cisgender women of labeling embryos as property. The Superior Court decision was subsequently overturned by the Ontario Court of Appeal this past May (2019). However, given the likelihood that embryos will be treated as property in …
Child Advocacy Studies (Cast): A National Movement To Improve The Undergraduate And Graduate Training Of Child Protection Professionals, Victor I. Vieth, Betsy Goulet, Michele Knox, Jennifer Parker, Lisa B. Johnson, Karla Steckler Tye, Theodore P. Cross
Child Advocacy Studies (Cast): A National Movement To Improve The Undergraduate And Graduate Training Of Child Protection Professionals, Victor I. Vieth, Betsy Goulet, Michele Knox, Jennifer Parker, Lisa B. Johnson, Karla Steckler Tye, Theodore P. Cross
Mitchell Hamline Law Review
No abstract provided.