Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Law (12)
- Affirmative Action (6)
- SFFA (6)
- Children (5)
- Diversity (5)
-
- Ethics (5)
- Family representation (5)
- Tort (4)
- Washington (4)
- Child (3)
- Constitutional Law (3)
- Domestic violence (3)
- Equal Protection (3)
- Family Law (3)
- Reform (3)
- Supreme Court (3)
- Washington state (3)
- Women (3)
- Adoption (2)
- Corporate Governance (2)
- Corporate Law (2)
- Corporate law (2)
- Courts (2)
- Dependency (2)
- ESG (2)
- Education (2)
- Equality (2)
- Estate planning (2)
- Family values (2)
- Fetus (2)
Articles 121 - 129 of 129
Full-Text Articles in Law
Wrongful Death Of The Fetus: Viability Is Not A Viable Distinction, Sheryl Anne Symonds
Wrongful Death Of The Fetus: Viability Is Not A Viable Distinction, Sheryl Anne Symonds
Seattle University Law Review
This Comment reviews the history of tort law treatment of the fetus who is wrongfully injured or killed. The Comment discusses case history and wrongful death statutes, with a focus on Washington law. Finally, the Comment concludes that courts should ignore viability when deciding cases of fetal wrongful death.
Confronting Child Victims Of Sex Abuse: The Unconstitutionality Of The Sexual Abuse Hearsay Exception, Katrin E. Frank
Confronting Child Victims Of Sex Abuse: The Unconstitutionality Of The Sexual Abuse Hearsay Exception, Katrin E. Frank
Seattle University Law Review
This Comment first analyzes Washington’s hearsay exception Act in the light of the principles that form the basis for the hearsay rule and its exceptions. It then examines the effect of the Act on the preexisting hearsay rules. Next, it compares the concept of unavailability as used in the hearsay exceptions with the concept of incompetence; both concepts are then analyzed according to the requirements of the hearsay rules and the confrontation clause. The Comment concludes that the Act is unconstitutional because it permits admission of hearsay of testimonially incompetent children.
Reforming The Tax Treatment Of Divorce: Splitting The Benefits Of A Split, C. Garrison Lepow
Reforming The Tax Treatment Of Divorce: Splitting The Benefits Of A Split, C. Garrison Lepow
Seattle University Law Review
The purpose of this Article is to consider the tax consequences of divorce, particularly those problems relating to property settlements. The tax consequences of alimony and child support are also considered. These problems have a long history that must be reviewed in order to understand both the present law and the current proposals which were considered by the House Ways and Means Committee during the last session of Congress. Unfortunately, the narrowness of the legislative proposals permits many of the problems to continue; the proposals change only the timing of the problem.
Deelche V. Jacobsen: Recovering From Community Property For A Separate Tort Judgment, Joseph R. Mcfaul
Deelche V. Jacobsen: Recovering From Community Property For A Separate Tort Judgment, Joseph R. Mcfaul
Seattle University Law Review
This note critically analyzes deElche against the historical background of community property statutes and evaluates its effect on previous case law that subverted community property principles, resulting in injustice to either the victim or the tortfeasor’s spouse. While deElche does not explicitly overrule these cases, it casts doubt on their current vitality. This note also responds to the dissent’s criticisms, and discusses the scope of the deElche decision.
Limitations On Creditors' Rights To Require Spouses' Signatures Under The Ecoa And Washington Community Property Law, Todd M. Johnson
Limitations On Creditors' Rights To Require Spouses' Signatures Under The Ecoa And Washington Community Property Law, Todd M. Johnson
Seattle University Law Review
This article examines the federal regulations' interaction with Washington community property law to determine when a creditor can require the signature of a Washington applicant's spouse on either a loan instrument or security agreement in five common situations: (1) a married applicant's request for credit secured by community property, (2) a married applicant's request for credit secured by separate property, (3) a married applicant's request for general unsecured credit, (4) a married applicant's request for unsecured credit in specific reliance upon his or her income flow, and (5) a married applicant's request for unsecured credit in specific reliance upon the …
The State's Interest In Adoption And Washington's Sealed Records Statute, Eileen M. Lawrence
The State's Interest In Adoption And Washington's Sealed Records Statute, Eileen M. Lawrence
Seattle University Law Review
After discussing the legal effect of the adoption decree and the purpose of Washington's adoption statute, this comment will analyze the competing interests of the adoptee, the biological parents, the adoptive parents, and the state. This article will also discuss the legislative proposal in Washington attempting to abolish the good cause requirement. Finally, this article concludes the sealed records requirement is constitutionally sound and despite the need for further legislative articulation, the good cause balancing approach is the most suitable method for protecting the conflicting rights and interests inherent in the adoption process.
Shepard V. Superior Court—Recovery For Mental Distress In A Products Liability Action, G. Scott Greenburg
Shepard V. Superior Court—Recovery For Mental Distress In A Products Liability Action, G. Scott Greenburg
Seattle University Law Review
In Shepard v. Superior Court, the California Court of Appeals held that a party directly witnessing injury to a close relative could recover damages for resulting mental distress in a strict products liability action. By recognizing a duty to avoid infliction of emotional distress in a products liability case, Shepard elevated a manufacturer's duty in strict liability to the level recently recognized in a negligence action. The court correctly reasoned that a cause of action for mental distress in products liability was consistent with economic realities of modern society and the purposes behind products liability.
Termination Of Parental Rights In Washington, Sandy D. Mcdade
Termination Of Parental Rights In Washington, Sandy D. Mcdade
Seattle University Law Review
Prior to 1978, Washington allowed trial judges broad discretion to decide, on a case by case basis, the necessity of terminating parental rights. The recently adopted Juvenile Court Act in Cases Relating to Dependency of A Child and the Termination of a Parent and Child Relationship represents a legislative attempt to nurture the family unit by severely limiting trial court discretion. The new law provides standards making judicial termination of parental rights difficult in all cases. The Institute of Judicial Administration and the American Bar Association also have jointly proposed standards limiting trial court discretion in termination proceedings. The ABA …
Post-Majority Child Support In Washington, George T. Cowan
Post-Majority Child Support In Washington, George T. Cowan
Seattle University Law Review
Simply stated, the purpose of child support is to provide necessary elements of support to those typically incapable of self-support. The definition of "necessary elements" constantly changes to meet the demands of an increasingly complex society. And although child support is limited to necessities, what is necessary also depends upon the social status and financial resources of the parents and is not limited to bare essentials unless those criteria so dictate. Accordingly, courts retain continuing jurisdiction to modify support decrees as the ability of the parents to provide support and the needs of the children change. In light of the …