Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Case Western Reserve University School of Law (7)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (6)
- University of Michigan Law School (5)
- Cleveland State University (3)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (3)
-
- Penn State Law (3)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (3)
- Cornell University Law School (2)
- Mercer University School of Law (2)
- Selected Works (2)
- UC Law SF (2)
- University of Baltimore Law (2)
- University of Miami Law School (2)
- Brigham Young University Law School (1)
- Campbell University School of Law (1)
- Chicago-Kent College of Law (1)
- Florida State University College of Law (1)
- Fordham Law School (1)
- Georgia State University College of Law (1)
- Loyola University Chicago, School of Law (1)
- St. Mary's University (1)
- UIC School of Law (1)
- University of Colorado Law School (1)
- University of Georgia School of Law (1)
- University of Kentucky (1)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (1)
- University of Missouri School of Law (1)
- University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Law (1)
- Keyword
-
- Evidence (18)
- Constitution (6)
- Federal (5)
- Testimony (5)
- 1990) (4)
-
- Hearsay (4)
- Litigation (4)
- New York (4)
- State (4)
- Defendant (3)
- N.Y. Cont. Art. I (3)
- Police (3)
- Probability (3)
- Supreme Court (3)
- Warrant (3)
- Witnesses (3)
- Admissibility (2)
- Arrest (2)
- Authentication (2)
- Constitutional (2)
- DNA (2)
- DNA Typing Standards Board (2)
- DNA evidence (2)
- Exclusions (2)
- Expert evidence (2)
- Expert testimony (2)
- Expert witnesses (2)
- Fourth amendment (2)
- Hearsay exception (2)
- Juries (2)
- Publication
-
- Faculty Publications (8)
- Articles (6)
- Touro Law Review (5)
- Faculty Scholarship (3)
- Journal Articles (3)
-
- All Faculty Scholarship (2)
- Cleveland State Law Review (2)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (2)
- Indiana Law Journal (2)
- Mercer Law Review (2)
- Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law (2)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (1)
- BYU Law Review (1)
- Campbell Law Review (1)
- Faculty Articles (1)
- Faculty Publications By Year (1)
- Faculty Works (1)
- Florida State University Law Review (1)
- Kentucky Law Journal (1)
- Law Faculty Articles and Essays (1)
- Loyola University Chicago Law Journal (1)
- Maryland Law Review (1)
- Popular Media (1)
- Publications (1)
- R. Michael Cassidy (1)
- Scholarly Works (1)
- Thomas J Reed (1)
- UIC Law Review (1)
- University of Baltimore Law Review (1)
- University of Miami Law Review (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 31 - 57 of 57
Full-Text Articles in Law
Evidence Scholarship, Old And New, Roger C. Park
Evidence Scholarship, Old And New, Roger C. Park
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Hearsay In State Administrative Hearings: The Maryland Experience And Suggestions For Change, Arnold Rochvarg
Hearsay In State Administrative Hearings: The Maryland Experience And Suggestions For Change, Arnold Rochvarg
University of Baltimore Law Review
No abstract provided.
Re-Examining Hearsay Under The Federal Rules: Some Method For The Madness, Paul S. Milich
Re-Examining Hearsay Under The Federal Rules: Some Method For The Madness, Paul S. Milich
Faculty Publications By Year
No abstract provided.
Procedural Options For Resolving Hearsay Issues, Roger C. Park
Procedural Options For Resolving Hearsay Issues, Roger C. Park
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
To See Or Not To See The Defendant: Expanding The Use Of Florida's Special Procedures For Taking The Testimony Of Witnesses, Glenn F. Lang
To See Or Not To See The Defendant: Expanding The Use Of Florida's Special Procedures For Taking The Testimony Of Witnesses, Glenn F. Lang
Florida State University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Character Impeachment Evidence: Psycho-Bayesian (!?) Analysis And A Proposed Overhaul, Richard D. Friedman
Character Impeachment Evidence: Psycho-Bayesian (!?) Analysis And A Proposed Overhaul, Richard D. Friedman
Articles
Typically, arguments for restricting character impeachment evidence are based in part on the premise that prior crimes, at least violent crimes, generally indicate little about a person's veracity. The argument advanced here against character impeachment of criminal defendants does not rely on that premise; in fact, it accepts the premise that prior antisocial behavior, even not involving dishonesty, often does indicate a good deal about a person's general truthtelling inclination. A careful analysis of the situation of the accused on the witness stand-rather than an easy assumption about irrelevance-leads to this Article's broad conclusion that character impeachment evidence of criminal …
Expert Testimony On The Batered Woman Syndrome In Maryland, Jeanne-Marie Bates
Expert Testimony On The Batered Woman Syndrome In Maryland, Jeanne-Marie Bates
Maryland Law Review
No abstract provided.
Public Opinion Polls And Surveys As Evidence: Suggestions For Resolving Confusing And Conflicting Standards Governing Weight And Admissibility , Susan J. Becker
Public Opinion Polls And Surveys As Evidence: Suggestions For Resolving Confusing And Conflicting Standards Governing Weight And Admissibility , Susan J. Becker
Law Faculty Articles and Essays
Section I provides a basic overview of public opinion polls, beginning with a brief explanation of the current popularity of this type of data, followed by a discussion of the courts' historic treatment of survey evidence and a review of modern standards which courts use in evaluating the weight and admissibility of polling data. The exact "rules" governing the conduct of litigants and their respective counsel in commissioning and executing a survey and those governing the courts' refereeing of evidentiary disputes over polling data remain unclear. These unresolved issues are discussed in Section II. Suggestions for moving toward a more …
Novel Scientific Evidence Of Intoxication: Acoustic Analysis Of Voice Recordings From The Exxon Valdez, J. Alexander Tanford, David B. Pisoni, Keith Johnson
Novel Scientific Evidence Of Intoxication: Acoustic Analysis Of Voice Recordings From The Exxon Valdez, J. Alexander Tanford, David B. Pisoni, Keith Johnson
Articles by Maurer Faculty
Part of this article reports original research conducted under the direction of the second and third authors. The initial re search was supported by a contract to Indiana University from General Motors Research Laboratories. The specific analyses of voice recordings of Captain Joseph Hazelwood were conducted by them at the re quest of the National Transportation Safety Board, and are based on tapes and data supplied by the NTSB. The second author may be called as a witness in some of the lawsuits pending against the Exxon Corporation. The opinions expressed in this article concerning whether this evidence meets the …
Genetically Altered Admissibility: Legislative Notice Of Dna Typing, Jayne L. Jakubaitis
Genetically Altered Admissibility: Legislative Notice Of Dna Typing, Jayne L. Jakubaitis
Cleveland State Law Review
This note examines the conflict over acceptance of DNA evidence. Part I discusses the process of DNA typing as a form of scientific evidence and the courts' responses to this novel technique. Part II examines the legislative responses to DNA typing. Part III explores the potential impact of the admissibility statutes both on the courts and on the accused. Finally, Part IV suggests areas of legislative regulation which may aid in resolving the current difficulties of DNA typing.
Videotaped Reenactments In Civil Trials: Protecting Probative Evidence From The Trial Judge's Unbridled Discretion, 24 J. Marshall L. Rev. 433 (1991), Elizabeth A. Savage
Videotaped Reenactments In Civil Trials: Protecting Probative Evidence From The Trial Judge's Unbridled Discretion, 24 J. Marshall L. Rev. 433 (1991), Elizabeth A. Savage
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Exclusionary Rule And Confession Evidence: Some Perspectives On Evolving Practices And Policies In The United States And England And Wales, Mark Berger
Faculty Works
No abstract provided.
Genetically Altered Admissibility: Legislative Notice Of Dna Typing, Jayne L. Jakubaitis
Genetically Altered Admissibility: Legislative Notice Of Dna Typing, Jayne L. Jakubaitis
Cleveland State Law Review
This note examines the conflict over acceptance of DNA evidence. Part I discusses the process of DNA typing as a form of scientific evidence and the courts' responses to this novel technique. Part II examines the legislative responses to DNA typing. Part III explores the potential impact of the admissibility statutes both on the courts and on the accused. Finally, Part IV suggests areas of legislative regulation which may aid in resolving the current difficulties of DNA typing.
Hear No Evil, See No Evil: On Professor Nesson's Claims About Evidence Suppression, Dale A. Nance
Hear No Evil, See No Evil: On Professor Nesson's Claims About Evidence Suppression, Dale A. Nance
Faculty Publications
Response to Professor Nesson's presentaiton at the Decision and Interference Litigation symposium, New York, New York, 1991.
Evidence, David A. Schlueter
Evidence, David A. Schlueter
Faculty Articles
This article addresses some of the more significant evidence cases decided by the Fifth Circuit during the survey period.' Before turning to the cases themselves, it is important to note at the outset that like other federal courts, the Fifth Circuit is generally not inclined to reverse a case on an evidentiary error. It should not be surprising then that in most of the cases which follow, the court implicitly deferred to the decision of the trial judge in deciding whether a certain piece of evidence was admissible.
Fourth, Fifth, And Sixth Amendments, William E. Hellerstein
Fourth, Fifth, And Sixth Amendments, William E. Hellerstein
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Jurisdiction Of The County Court
Improving The Procedure For Resolving Hearsay Issues, Richard D. Friedman
Improving The Procedure For Resolving Hearsay Issues, Richard D. Friedman
Articles
In this article, I propose two changes in the way hearsay issues are usually resolved. First, in some circumstances courts should divide the burdens of producing the declarant-for example, by imposing the physical burden on the proponent and the financial burden on the opponent. Second, no matter how the declarant is produced as a witness, she should ordinarily testify as part of the proponent's case, subject to cross-examination by the opponent. If the declarant does become a witness, the admissibility of her out-of-court statement should not be resolved until her current testimony about the underlying events is received.
The Whole Truth?: How Rules Of Evidence Make Lawyers Deceitful, Bruce A. Green
The Whole Truth?: How Rules Of Evidence Make Lawyers Deceitful, Bruce A. Green
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Missing Evidence, Dale A. Nance
Missing Evidence, Dale A. Nance
Faculty Publications
Given the nature of my enterprise, I resist stating a specific thesis. Nevertheless, for the reader who wants an organizing or motivating principle, I offer the following two recurrent themes. First, I want to examine the relationship of traditional admissibility rules to the problem of missing evidence and to other forms of juridical response to that problem. The reason for this interest will be explained in the next section. Second, I want to investigate, as we proceed, the extent to which the regulation of proof, evidence law broadly conceived, is instrumentally related to accuracy or truth seeking, and the extent …
Rules Of Evidence Amendments, Paul C. Giannelli
Rules Of Evidence Amendments, Paul C. Giannelli
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Dna Evidence, Paul C. Giannelli
Gunshot Residue Tests, Paul C. Giannelli
Nita Problems In Evidence: Student Manual, Thomas Reed
Nita Problems In Evidence: Student Manual, Thomas Reed
Thomas J Reed
No abstract provided.