Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- University of Michigan Law School (5)
- Case Western Reserve University School of Law (3)
- Loyola University Chicago, School of Law (3)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (2)
- University of Richmond (2)
-
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (2)
- American University Washington College of Law (1)
- Boston University School of Law (1)
- Florida International University College of Law (1)
- Florida State University College of Law (1)
- Georgetown University Law Center (1)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (1)
- Pace University (1)
- Seattle University School of Law (1)
- Selected Works (1)
- UIC School of Law (1)
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock William H. Bowen School of Law (1)
- University of Denver (1)
- University of Kentucky (1)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (1)
- University of Miami Law School (1)
- University of Washington School of Law (1)
- University of the Pacific (1)
- William & Mary Law School (1)
- Keyword
-
- Evidence (7)
- United States Supreme Court (5)
- Federal Rules of Evidence (3)
- Litigation (3)
- Police (3)
-
- Admissibility of evidence (2)
- Admissible evidence (2)
- Confessions (2)
- Department of Justice Office of Legal Policy (2)
- Exclusionary rule (2)
- Expert testimony (2)
- Fifth Amendment (2)
- Law reform (2)
- Miranda v. Arizona (2)
- Searches (2)
- Sixth Amendment (2)
- Testimony (2)
- Truth in Criminal Justice Series (2)
- Admissibility (1)
- Ake v. Oklahoma (1)
- Annual Survey of Virginia Law (1)
- Antitrust (1)
- Arizona V. Youngblood: Does the Criminal Defendant Lose His Right to Due Process When the State Loses Exculpatory Evidence (1)
- Bad faith (1)
- Bennett v. Commonwealth (1)
- Child sexual abuse (1)
- Clinebell v. Commonwealth (1)
- Coercion (1)
- Common law (1)
- Confrontation clause (1)
- Publication
-
- Faculty Publications (5)
- Loyola University Chicago Law Journal (3)
- Michigan Law Review (3)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (2)
- University of Richmond Law Review (2)
-
- Washington and Lee Law Review (2)
- Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals (1)
- David Aaronson (1)
- Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications (1)
- Faculty Articles (1)
- Faculty Scholarship (1)
- Florida State University Law Review (1)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (1)
- Indiana Law Journal (1)
- Kentucky Law Journal (1)
- Maryland Law Review (1)
- McGeorge School of Law Scholarly Articles (1)
- Scholarly Works (1)
- Sturm College of Law: Faculty Scholarship (1)
- Touro Law Review (1)
- UIC Law Open Access Faculty Scholarship (1)
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review (1)
- University of Miami Law Review (1)
- Washington Law Review (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 31 - 35 of 35
Full-Text Articles in Law
Impeachment Of Witnesses: Part I, Paul C. Giannelli
Impeachment Of Witnesses: Part I, Paul C. Giannelli
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Bracton, The Year Books, And The 'Transformation Of Elementary Legal Ideas' In The Early Common Law, David J. Seipp
Bracton, The Year Books, And The 'Transformation Of Elementary Legal Ideas' In The Early Common Law, David J. Seipp
Faculty Scholarship
The language of the common law has a life and a logic of its own, resilient through eight centuries of unceasing talk. Basic terms of the lawyer's specialized vocabulary, elementary conceptual distinctions, and modes of argument, which all go to make “thinking like a lawyer” possible, have proved remarkably durable in the literature of the common law. Two fundamental distinctions—between “real” and “personal” actions and between “possessory” and “proprietary” remedies—can be traced back to their early use in treatises of the first generations of professional common law judges and in reports of courtroom dialogue from the first generations of professional …
Fit To Be Fryed: Frye V. United States And The Admissibility Of Novel Scientific Evidence, John D. Borders Jr.
Fit To Be Fryed: Frye V. United States And The Admissibility Of Novel Scientific Evidence, John D. Borders Jr.
Kentucky Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Needed: A Rewrite, Paul F. Rothstein
Needed: A Rewrite, Paul F. Rothstein
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
Proposed far-reaching changes in the Federal Rules of Evidence are of major practical significance to every lawyer involved in the criminal justice process. The proposed changes are contained in a recent report by the American Bar Association Criminal Justice Section's Rules of Criminal Procedure and Evidence Committee. The report was selected for publication in Federal Rules Decisions, 120 F.R.D. 299 (1988), because of its interest to federal practitioners and judges. More than 40 judges, lawyers, and scholars were involved in the four-year study, and experts on each particular rule acted as "reporters" to the committee on those areas.
The report …
Helping Jurors To Make Sense Of Expert Testimony, David Aaronson