Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (12)
- University of Michigan Law School (8)
- Case Western Reserve University School of Law (4)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (4)
- North Carolina Central University School of Law (3)
-
- University of Richmond (3)
- Georgetown University Law Center (2)
- St. Mary's University (2)
- University at Buffalo School of Law (2)
- University of Kentucky (2)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (2)
- West Virginia University (2)
- Cornell University Law School (1)
- Loyola University Chicago, School of Law (1)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (1)
- Mercer University School of Law (1)
- Penn State Law (1)
- UC Law SF (1)
- UIC School of Law (1)
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock William H. Bowen School of Law (1)
- Valparaiso University (1)
- William & Mary Law School (1)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (1)
- Keyword
-
- Evidence (13)
- Federal Rules of Evidence (4)
- Litigation (4)
- Ohio (4)
- Testimony (4)
-
- Admissibility of evidence (2)
- Exclusionary rule (2)
- Fourth Amendment (2)
- Instructions to juries (2)
- Search and seizure (2)
- Supreme Court (2)
- Trials (2)
- Analysis (1)
- Bruce v. United States (1)
- Burden of Proof (1)
- Child abuse (1)
- Children (1)
- Christy v. United States (1)
- Civil Trial (1)
- Clayton Act (1)
- Comparison evidence (1)
- Complex litigation (1)
- Confidential communications -- Psychotherapists (1)
- Confidentiality (1)
- County Court of Ulster County v. Allen (1)
- Courts -- United States (1)
- Crimes (1)
- Criminal (1)
- Criminal Evidence (1)
- Criminal justice (1)
- Publication
-
- Villanova Law Review (12)
- Faculty Publications (4)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (4)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (4)
- Michigan Law Review (3)
-
- North Carolina Central Law Review (3)
- Articles (2)
- Buffalo Law Review (2)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (2)
- Kentucky Law Journal (2)
- Law Faculty Publications (2)
- St. Mary's Law Journal (2)
- University of Richmond Law Review (2)
- West Virginia Law Review (2)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (1)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (1)
- Faculty Scholarship (1)
- Journal Articles (1)
- Loyola University Chicago Law Journal (1)
- Mercer Law Review (1)
- UIC Law Open Access Faculty Scholarship (1)
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review (1)
- Vanderbilt Law Review (1)
- Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications (1)
- William & Mary Law Review (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 31 - 57 of 57
Full-Text Articles in Law
The Ohio Rules Of Evidence: Part Iv, Paul C. Giannelli
The Ohio Rules Of Evidence: Part Iv, Paul C. Giannelli
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Constitutional Law, Various Editors
Criminal Procedure, Various Editors
Legal Ethics: Ideas In Conflict - Editor's Preface, Doris Del Tosto
Legal Ethics: Ideas In Conflict - Editor's Preface, Doris Del Tosto
Villanova Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Proposed Revisions Of The Code Of Professional Responsibility: Solving The Crisis Of Professionalism, Or Legitimating The Status Quo, Mary Joe Frug
Villanova Law Review
No abstract provided.
Revision, Not Rejection, Is The Way To Modernize The Code Of Professional Responsibility, Allen B. Zerfoss
Revision, Not Rejection, Is The Way To Modernize The Code Of Professional Responsibility, Allen B. Zerfoss
Villanova Law Review
No abstract provided.
Current Controversies Concerning Witness Immunity In The Federal Courts, Jane Duffy
Current Controversies Concerning Witness Immunity In The Federal Courts, Jane Duffy
Villanova Law Review
No abstract provided.
Upjohn: A New Prescription For The Attorney-Client Privilege And Work Product Defenses In Administrative Investigations, Robert G. Nath
Upjohn: A New Prescription For The Attorney-Client Privilege And Work Product Defenses In Administrative Investigations, Robert G. Nath
Buffalo Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Permissibility Of Impeaching An Alibi Witness With Evidence Of His Pre-Trial Silence: The New York Court Of Appeals Decision In People V. Dawson, Brian T. Edwards
The Permissibility Of Impeaching An Alibi Witness With Evidence Of His Pre-Trial Silence: The New York Court Of Appeals Decision In People V. Dawson, Brian T. Edwards
Buffalo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Discovery Of Penalties, W. Hamilton Bryson
Discovery Of Penalties, W. Hamilton Bryson
University of Richmond Law Review
It is a well-established and fundamental principle of justice that no one may be compelled to subject himself to punishments nor to give evidence leading to that result. Nemo tenetur prodere seipsum is an ancient maxim. It was written directly into the Virginia Declaration of Rights in 1776, which states that in all "criminal prosecutions" no one can "be compelled to give evidence against himself." This idea was also incorporated into the United States Constitution in 1791 through the fifth amendment.
Discovery And The Privacy Act: Exemption (B)(11) To The Conditions Of Disclosure: What Qualifies As An "Order Of The Court"?, John W. Williams
Discovery And The Privacy Act: Exemption (B)(11) To The Conditions Of Disclosure: What Qualifies As An "Order Of The Court"?, John W. Williams
University of Richmond Law Review
On December 31, 1974, President Gerald Ford signed the landmark Privacy Act of 1974 into law. One of the key concepts of the Act is the principle of disclosure limitation, which limits the ability of the federal government to disclose the contents of per- sonal records in its possession. In the words of the Senate Governmental Operations Committee, this principle "is designed to pre- vent.., the wrongful disclosure and use of personal files held by Federal agencies."
Mccormick On Evidence And The Concept Of Hearsay: A Critical Analysis Followed By Suggestions To Law Teachers, Roger C. Park
Mccormick On Evidence And The Concept Of Hearsay: A Critical Analysis Followed By Suggestions To Law Teachers, Roger C. Park
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Constitutional Protection For Private Papers, Craig M. Bradley
Constitutional Protection For Private Papers, Craig M. Bradley
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
The Psychotherapist - Patient Privilege In Child Placement: A Relevancy Analysis, Thomas F. Guernsey
The Psychotherapist - Patient Privilege In Child Placement: A Relevancy Analysis, Thomas F. Guernsey
Villanova Law Review
No abstract provided.
In Support Of The Proposed Model Rules Of Professional Conduct, Robert B. Mckay
In Support Of The Proposed Model Rules Of Professional Conduct, Robert B. Mckay
Villanova Law Review
No abstract provided.
Current Format Of The Code Of Professional Responsibility Should Be Amended, Not Abandoned, To Accomodate The Need For Change, Alexander Unkovic
Current Format Of The Code Of Professional Responsibility Should Be Amended, Not Abandoned, To Accomodate The Need For Change, Alexander Unkovic
Villanova Law Review
No abstract provided.
Symposium Proceedings, Various Editors
Grand Jury: A Prosecutor Need Not Present Exculpatory Evidence
Grand Jury: A Prosecutor Need Not Present Exculpatory Evidence
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Safeguards Against Suggestiveness: A Means For Admissibility Of Hypno-Induced Testimony
Safeguards Against Suggestiveness: A Means For Admissibility Of Hypno-Induced Testimony
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Income Taxation And The Calculation Of Tort Damage Awards: The Ramifications Of Norfolk & Western Railway V. Liepelt
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Admissibility Of Hypnotically Induced Recollection, R. Eberley Davis
The Admissibility Of Hypnotically Induced Recollection, R. Eberley Davis
Kentucky Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Faces Without Features: The Surface Validity Of Criminal Inferences, Peter Lushing
Faces Without Features: The Surface Validity Of Criminal Inferences, Peter Lushing
Articles
This article will offer nonempirical grounds to show that instructed inferences operate as the dissenters believe, at least when the instruction does not explicitly refer to the evidence at trial, but to occurrences in general.
The Ohio Rules Of Evidence: Part V, Paul C. Giannelli
The Ohio Rules Of Evidence: Part V, Paul C. Giannelli
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
The Ohio Rules Of Evidence: Part Iii, Paul C. Giannelli
The Ohio Rules Of Evidence: Part Iii, Paul C. Giannelli
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Perils Of The Rulemaking Process: The Development, Application, And Unconstitutionality Of Rule 804(B)(3)'S Penal Interest Exception, Peter W. Tague
Perils Of The Rulemaking Process: The Development, Application, And Unconstitutionality Of Rule 804(B)(3)'S Penal Interest Exception, Peter W. Tague
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
As the culmination of a decade of rulemaking, in 1975 Congress enacted the Federal Rules of Evidence, which include in rule 804(b)(3) an exception to the hearsay rule that allows federal courts to admit statements against penal interest. Having reviewed previously unpublished memoranda and nonpublic tape recordings of the deliberations of the Advisory and Standing Committees to the Judicial Conference and the Special Subcommittee on Reform of Federal Criminal Laws of the House Judiciary Committee, Professor Tague explores the development of rule 804(b)(3), one of the more controversial rules that emerged from that rulemaking process. After analyzing rule 804(b)(3) and …
Capacity To Contest A Search And Seizure: The Passing Of Old Rules And Some Suggestions For New Ones, Christopher Slobogin
Capacity To Contest A Search And Seizure: The Passing Of Old Rules And Some Suggestions For New Ones, Christopher Slobogin
Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications
Professor Slobogin examines recent Supreme Court decisions involving standing to challenge search and seizure violations, and argues that the Court's commitment to a "totality of the circumstances" approach has permitted erosion of fourth amendment protections. After concluding that these decisions provide little guidance to lower courts, Professor Slobogin offers a set of principles which will aid in analyzing the Court's direction.
The Federal Rules Of Evidence: Six Years After, Paul F. Rothstein
The Federal Rules Of Evidence: Six Years After, Paul F. Rothstein
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
The Federal Rules of Evidence have been in effect since 1975. Six years of experience is not much time in which to assess such a complex and important body of law. Nevertheless, there is now some "evidence" of the impact of the Federal Rules on the various states and circuits.
The Rules do seem to have proved successful enough to stimulate widespread imitation. Approximately half the states in the United States have or will very shortly have evidence codes patterned substantially on the Rules, even down to their numbers. Many of the remaining states (e.g., Iowa, Illinois, and Pennsylvania) have …