Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Admissibility (1)
- Arrests (1)
- Consular immunities (1)
- Consular officers (1)
- Criminal Law (1)
-
- Evidence (1)
- Federal Rules of Evidence (1)
- Former-testimony (1)
- Michigan (1)
- Motive and interest standard (1)
- People v. Terry (1)
- Police (1)
- Prior testimony (1)
- Probable cause (1)
- Search warrants (1)
- Searches (1)
- Seizures (1)
- Stop and frisk (1)
- Terry v. Ohio (1)
- Treaties (1)
- United States Supreme Court (1)
Articles 1 - 5 of 5
Full-Text Articles in Law
Schneble V. Florida, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Schneble V. Florida, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
Searches Without Warrants, Jerold H. Israel
Searches Without Warrants, Jerold H. Israel
Book Chapters
My primary area of concentration today is the search made without a warrant. Studies indicate that 95 percent or more of all searches are without warrants. It is quite understandable, then, that most of the search-and-seizure litigation concerns the validity of searches without warrants.
Consular Officer's Amenability As Witness, Stephen J. Werber
Consular Officer's Amenability As Witness, Stephen J. Werber
Law Faculty Articles and Essays
The purpose of this paper is to examine various treaty provisions in an effort to ascertain the manner in which a consular officer's obligation to testify is set forth, the immunities given such an officer and some of the problems raised by both the obligation and the immunities.
Intrusion Into The Body, William G. Eckhardt
Intrusion Into The Body, William G. Eckhardt
Faculty Works
The thesis of this article is that the rights of servicemen should be protected with the search and seizure concepts of the fourth amendment rather than with the fifth amendment protection against self-incrimination when intrusive bodily searches are required. The Supreme Court enunciated standard for intrusion into the body found in Schmerber v. California, 384 U.S. 757 (1966). The subsequent application of this standard in the federal courts, and its adoption in the Manual for Courts-Martial, United States, 1969, (Rev.) are explored. Federal court decisions discussing the privilege against self-incrimination are contrasted with opinions of the Court of Military Appeals …
Former-Testimony Exception In The Proposed Federal Rules Of Evidence, The , Michael M. Martin
Former-Testimony Exception In The Proposed Federal Rules Of Evidence, The , Michael M. Martin
Faculty Scholarship
According to one member of the Advisory Committee which drafted them, the proposed Rules of Evidence for the United States Courts and Magistrates were promulgated to "improve the truth-finding capacity of the courts," as well as to provide the benefits of simplification and uniformity. In much the same way that the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure have led to modernization of procedural rules in many states, the proposed Federal Rules of Evidence may be the vehicle by which improvements unsuccessfully codified in the Model Code of Evidence and the Uniform Rules of Evidence can finally be achieved across the United …