Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Publications (6)
- Climate change (4)
- New York Law Journal (4)
- Clean Air Act (3)
- Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (3)
-
- National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) (3)
- US Policy (3)
- Clean Water Act (CWA) (2)
- Ecosystem services (2)
- Energy (2)
- Environmental Impact Assessment (2)
- Environmental Law Reporter (2)
- Environmental impact statement (EIS) (2)
- Environmental law (2)
- Global warming (2)
- Globalization (2)
- Greenhouse gas (GHG) (2)
- Judicial review (2)
- SEQRA (2)
- State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) (2)
- United States (2)
- 1. Tigers (1)
- 2. Human-wildlife conflict (1)
- 3. Conservation (1)
- 9/11 Fund (1)
- APA Section 706 (1)
- Adaptation (1)
- Administrative Law Review (1)
- Administrative action (1)
- Administrative law (1)
Articles 31 - 35 of 35
Full-Text Articles in Law
On Capturing The Possible Significance Of Institutional Design And Ethos, Peter L. Strauss
On Capturing The Possible Significance Of Institutional Design And Ethos, Peter L. Strauss
Faculty Scholarship
At a recent conference, a new judge from one of the federal courts of appeal – for the United States, the front line in judicial control of administrative action-made a plea to the lawyers in attendance. Please, he urged, in briefing and arguing cases reviewing agency actions, help us judges to understand their broader contexts. So often, he complained, the briefs and arguments are limited to the particular small issues of the case. We get little sense of the broad context in which it arises – the agency responsibilities in their largest sense, the institutional issues that may be at …
Greenhouse Gases: Emerging Standards For Impact Review, Michael B. Gerrard
Greenhouse Gases: Emerging Standards For Impact Review, Michael B. Gerrard
Faculty Scholarship
Numerous federal and state judicial decisions have established that environmental impact statements (EISs) under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and its state equivalents should examine the impact of proposed projects on emissions of greenhouse gases (GHG), the principal anthropogenic cause of climate change. Administrative agencies and court settlements are now establishing the guidelines for the conduct of these examinations.
Coal-Fired Powerplants Dominate Climate Change Litigation, Michael B. Gerrard
Coal-Fired Powerplants Dominate Climate Change Litigation, Michael B. Gerrard
Faculty Scholarship
Litigation aiming to reduce emissions of greenhouse gases (GHGs) is coming to be dominated by battles over coal-fired power plants. Ten of the last 20 judicial or administrative decisions or case filings in matters aiming to reduce GHGs have concerned such plants. A concerted effort by the environmental community to fight the use of coal is behind much of this litigation. According to the Energy Information Administration, the combustion of coal is the largest source of GHG emissions in the United States; motor vehicles are a not-very-close second.
The Sierra Club has a Web site that tracks all the proposed …
Court Of Appeals Expands Seqra Standing After An 18-Year Detour, Michael B. Gerrard
Court Of Appeals Expands Seqra Standing After An 18-Year Detour, Michael B. Gerrard
Faculty Scholarship
The most controversial decision in New York environmental jurisprudence is almost certainly Society of the Plastics Industry v. County of Suffolk (Plastics), in which the Court of Appeals ruled in 1991 that plaintiffs in suits under the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) must show that they are affected differently than the public at large. In the 18 years since that decision, the New York Attorney General, the State Department of Environmental Conservation, the New York State and New York City bar associations, and numerous environmental groups all filed amicus briefs or issued reports calling for the reversal of …
The Obama Administration's First Environmental Policy Changes, Michael B. Gerrard
The Obama Administration's First Environmental Policy Changes, Michael B. Gerrard
Faculty Scholarship
Under President Clinton the U.S. EPA took the position that it had the authority to regulate greenhouse gases (GHGs) from motor vehicles under the Clean Air Act as written, but the Clinton administration did not take affirmative steps to actually employ that authority. When President Bush took office, the General Counsel of EPA took the opposite position, stating that it would need special authorizing legislation in order to architect that regulation. A petition was filed with the EPA by the International Council for Technology Assessment and other organizations asking EPA to impose such regulations. EPA denied the petition. This led …