Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Fordham Law School (18)
- Marquette University Law School (3)
- Selected Works (3)
- University of Michigan Law School (3)
- Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School (2)
-
- Pace University (2)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (1)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (1)
- Pepperdine University (1)
- Roger Williams University (1)
- University of Baltimore Law (1)
- University of Cincinnati College of Law (1)
- University of Miami Law School (1)
- University of New Hampshire (1)
- University of Pittsburgh School of Law (1)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal (18)
- Marquette Sports Law Review (3)
- Michigan Law Review (3)
- Law Faculty Scholarship (2)
- Loyola of Los Angeles Entertainment Law Review (2)
-
- Pace Intellectual Property, Sports & Entertainment Law Forum (2)
- All Faculty Scholarship (1)
- Articles (1)
- Brett Frischmann (1)
- Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present) (1)
- Northwestern University Law Review (1)
- Paul M. Schwartz (1)
- Sonia Katyal (1)
- The Journal of Business, Entrepreneurship & the Law (1)
- The University of Cincinnati Intellectual Property and Computer Law Journal (1)
- University of Miami Entertainment & Sports Law Review (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 31 - 40 of 40
Full-Text Articles in Law
Irving V. Penguin: Historians On Trial And The Determination Of Truth Under English Libel Law, Dennise Mulvihill
Irving V. Penguin: Historians On Trial And The Determination Of Truth Under English Libel Law, Dennise Mulvihill
Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Panel Ii: Cable Versus Broadcast Tv: The “Must Carry” Provisions Of The Cable Television Consumer And Competition Act Of 1992, Marc Apfelbaum, Gregory Buscarino, Steven J. Hyman, Robert D. Joffe
Panel Ii: Cable Versus Broadcast Tv: The “Must Carry” Provisions Of The Cable Television Consumer And Competition Act Of 1992, Marc Apfelbaum, Gregory Buscarino, Steven J. Hyman, Robert D. Joffe
Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Panel I: The Changing Landscape Of First Amendment Jurisprudence In Light Of The New Communications And Media Alliances, J. Richard Devlin, Theodore C. Hirt, Andrew A. Merdek
Panel I: The Changing Landscape Of First Amendment Jurisprudence In Light Of The New Communications And Media Alliances, J. Richard Devlin, Theodore C. Hirt, Andrew A. Merdek
Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Panel Iii: Cable Versus The Telephone Companies: Can Telephone Companies Be Constitutionally Barred From Delivering Video Programming? , David E. Bronston, James J. Gilligan, Mark C. Hansen, Joseph A. Post
Panel Iii: Cable Versus The Telephone Companies: Can Telephone Companies Be Constitutionally Barred From Delivering Video Programming? , David E. Bronston, James J. Gilligan, Mark C. Hansen, Joseph A. Post
Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Restricting The Right Of Correspondence In The Prison Context: Thornburgh V. Abbott And Its Progeny, Samuel J. Levine
Restricting The Right Of Correspondence In The Prison Context: Thornburgh V. Abbott And Its Progeny, Samuel J. Levine
Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Ward V. Rock Against Racism: How Time, Place And Manner Further Restrict The Public Forum, Michael B. Manley
Ward V. Rock Against Racism: How Time, Place And Manner Further Restrict The Public Forum, Michael B. Manley
Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Constitutional Protection Of The First Amendment Is Still Available Contrary To Falwell's Beliefs: Hustler Magazine V. Falwell, Andrea S. Froome
Constitutional Protection Of The First Amendment Is Still Available Contrary To Falwell's Beliefs: Hustler Magazine V. Falwell, Andrea S. Froome
University of Miami Entertainment & Sports Law Review
No abstract provided.
Constitutional Law - Freedom Of Press - Validity Of Motion Picture Licensing Statute, Dean L. Berry S.Ed.
Constitutional Law - Freedom Of Press - Validity Of Motion Picture Licensing Statute, Dean L. Berry S.Ed.
Michigan Law Review
The distributor of the motion picture "Lady Chatterley's Lover" applied to the Motion Picture Division of the New York State Education Department for a license, required by New York law, for public presentation of the film. The application was denied on the ground the film was "immoral" within the meaning of the licensing statute. On review, the Board of Regents approved this determination, but on appeal the state supreme court reversed the Board. A divided court of appeals reversed the supreme court, holding that the contents of the film met the statutory definition of "immoral." On appeal to the Supreme …
St. John-Stevas: Obscenity And The Law, William B. Lockhart
St. John-Stevas: Obscenity And The Law, William B. Lockhart
Michigan Law Review
A Review of Obscenity and the Law . By Norman St. John-Stevas
Constitutional Law - Censorship Of Obscence Literature, Donald M. Wilkinson, Jr. S.Ed.
Constitutional Law - Censorship Of Obscence Literature, Donald M. Wilkinson, Jr. S.Ed.
Michigan Law Review
The right to a free expression of ideas, without interference from governmental authorities, is inherent in the very nature of a democracy. On the other hand, it is also clear that the greater interests of the state at large will conflict with certain forms of expression, and in such circumstances obviously the former must prevail. It is the purpose of this comment to discuss the constitutional limitations on the governmental suppression of literature on grounds of obscenity.