Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Law
Compelling Parties To Mediate Investor-State Disputes: No Pressure, No Diamonds?, James M. Claxton
Compelling Parties To Mediate Investor-State Disputes: No Pressure, No Diamonds?, James M. Claxton
Pepperdine Dispute Resolution Law Journal
There was nothing preordained about arbitration becoming shorthand for investor-state dispute settlement. The ICSID system was built on the assumption that disputing parties would choose conciliation to settle their disputes. Those expectations went unrealized as arbitration rose to prominence, and since that time institutions, parties, and academics have observed that facilitated negotiation could play a greater role in resolving investor-state disputes. A number of domestic court systems have made mediation part of the fabric of dispute resolution through incentives and compulsions to mediate. Drawing on this experience, this manuscript considers how obstacles to the uptake of investor-state mediation might be …
Comment On Us Trade And Investment Agreements Submitted To Ustr, Columbia Center On Sustainable Investment
Comment On Us Trade And Investment Agreements Submitted To Ustr, Columbia Center On Sustainable Investment
Columbia Center on Sustainable Investment Staff Publications
Comments to USTR Re: U.S.-Kenya Trade Agreement (April 28, 2020): CCSI, in response to the United States Trade Representative’s request for public comment to inform its approach to a U.S.-Kenya Trade Agreement, submitted Comments elaborating on our main points that (1) investor-state dispute settlement should not be included in any U.S.-Kenya agreement and (2) principles that should guide an investment chapter or investment provisions in any such agreement should (a) strategically support cross-border investment that produces positive development outcomes for the U.S. and Kenya, (b) facilitate and support good governance of investment projects, and (c) enhance cooperation to solve challenges …
Investor-State Arbitration: Economic And Empirical Perspectives, Michael Faure, Wanli Ma
Investor-State Arbitration: Economic And Empirical Perspectives, Michael Faure, Wanli Ma
Michigan Journal of International Law
The investor-state arbitration system (“ISA”) was originally modelled on traditional commercial arbitration and was expected to deliver fast, good, and cheap decisions, especially in comparison to domestic court systems. Yet the ISA system has increasingly been criticized, especially by developing countries. Developing countries claim that the system is not cheap, that decision-making increasingly takes a long time, and that arbitrators are biased in favor of investors (often coming from developed countries in the global North) and against states from the developing South. Several developing states have even withdrawn from the ICSID Convention, which governs the settlement of disputes between investors …
Sovereign Wealth Funds And Investor-State Dispute Settlement: Examining Questions Of Icsid’S Jurisdiction And The Impact Of Investment-Treaty Arbitration, Muhammad Ussama
Sovereign Wealth Funds And Investor-State Dispute Settlement: Examining Questions Of Icsid’S Jurisdiction And The Impact Of Investment-Treaty Arbitration, Muhammad Ussama
Arbitration Brief
The rate of foreign direct investment made by sovereign wealth funds has increased significantly during the past decade. Various concerns raised by host states— especially those located in the developed world—regarding the purposes and objectives of foreign investments made by these funds have led these states to take measures to protect themselves. Countries such as Canada, Germany, and the United States have issued new laws to address these concerns. Due to the broad discretion and flexibility that these laws grant to the governments of the host states, allegations of mistreatment by investors from the Global South, including sovereign wealth funds, …